You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #47: The American Academy of Pediatrics didn't have a problem with it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. The American Academy of Pediatrics didn't have a problem with it
Are they in on the conspiracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Neurologica: Mercury Excretion in Infants varkam  Feb-04-08 07:40 PM   #0 
  - Great article!  cosmik debris   Feb-04-08 07:55 PM   #1 
  - more junk science  jeanruss   Feb-04-08 08:19 PM   #4 
     - So you believe the shills peddling chelation therapy?  cosmik debris   Feb-04-08 08:57 PM   #5 
     - no mercury  jeanruss   Feb-04-08 09:19 PM   #7 
     - Of course the rate of serious adverse reactions to Gardasil...  varkam   Feb-04-08 09:26 PM   #10 
     - WOW! You sure changed the subject fast!  cosmik debris   Feb-04-08 09:30 PM   #11 
     - Studies in the med. lit. have documented the mechanisms of vaccines/mercury causing autism -documen  philb   Feb-05-08 10:47 PM   #92 
     - same bogus links over and over and over and over and over ...  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 07:44 AM   #101 
     - Vaccine induces Demyelination & Autoimmunity a documented cause of autism- detailed doc.  philb   Feb-05-08 11:09 PM   #95 
        - I know that issues of citations are completely lost on you, but...  varkam   Feb-05-08 11:35 PM   #99 
     - Do you have ANY links or cites WHATSOEVER...  trotsky   Feb-04-08 09:39 PM   #14 
        - I think you've been dealing with Mr. Cites a bit too much lately.  varkam   Feb-04-08 09:40 PM   #16 
           - That study poorly done/bogus documented by peer-reviewed studies in post 83, 85  philb   Feb-05-08 10:14 PM   #88 
              - Additional support by the tests and experience of treatment clinics and the ARI parent survey of tho  philb   Feb-05-08 10:19 PM   #89 
              - For Christ's Sake  varkam   Feb-05-08 10:44 PM   #91 
                 - Documented mechanism by which mercury/thimerosl causes schizophrenic behavior in autism/schizophreni  philb   Feb-05-08 11:02 PM   #94 
                    - Like I said  varkam   Feb-05-08 11:31 PM   #97 
                    - This is what you call a peer reviewed study??  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 08:13 AM   #106 
              - Your sources stink.  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 07:47 AM   #102 
                 - You are wrong; anyone can check that my sources are peer-reviewed and have not been discredited by  philb   Feb-10-08 01:04 PM   #120 
                 - I checked your links-- they are bullshit  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 01:05 PM   #121 
                    - I don't know what links you are talking about, but I cited hundreds of peer-reviewed studies  philb   Feb-10-08 01:16 PM   #122 
                       - I picked six links that you cited.  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 01:18 PM   #123 
                          - Just not true as anyone who follows the trail can see. All statements and references are accurate  philb   Feb-10-08 11:01 PM   #150 
                             - Who will believe your fake lab report for Mrs. Sample Patient  cosmik debris   Feb-11-08 08:51 AM   #151 
                 - Large independent survey finds link between Autism and ADHD with vaccination  philb   Feb-10-08 01:18 PM   #124 
                    - Another step into the hole for philb.  chicagomd   Feb-10-08 03:00 PM   #141 
     - The huge Autism Association/ARI survey of thousands of parents is clear documentation; plus ...  philb   Feb-05-08 11:24 PM   #96 
        - Bernie! A SURVEY IS NOT SOUND EPIDEMOLOGICAL EVIDENCE!  varkam   Feb-05-08 11:37 PM   #100 
        - Autism Association is NOT a reliable source.  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 07:52 AM   #103 
           - The best evidence the antivax hysterics could possibly present  Warpy   Feb-07-08 11:36 PM   #115 
              - Public policy? Breakthroughs?  varkam   Feb-08-08 03:41 AM   #116 
     - Sweet, delicious irony.  varkam   Feb-04-08 09:34 PM   #12 
     - It is just easier to ignore facts that don't fit. n/t  cosmik debris   Feb-04-08 09:40 PM   #15 
     - Yeah, but these facts were in the damn abstract.  varkam   Feb-04-08 09:41 PM   #17 
     - I didn't have any trouble, but then  cosmik debris   Feb-04-08 09:49 PM   #18 
     - You've supplied not a single valid study, all have been demonstrated poorly done, wrong  philb   Feb-05-08 10:28 PM   #90 
        - Don't need to.  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 07:59 AM   #104 
     - the study  itsjustme   Feb-04-08 10:42 PM   #19 
        - From the OP:  varkam   Feb-04-08 11:07 PM   #20 
        - I don't think you can reach that conclusion  itsjustme   Feb-04-08 11:24 PM   #21 
           - But the data doesn't exactly warrant that conclusion.  varkam   Feb-04-08 11:30 PM   #22 
              - nothing about any of this is conclusive  itsjustme   Feb-04-08 11:43 PM   #23 
                 - Also, note that there is a smaller N...  varkam   Feb-04-08 11:45 PM   #24 
                    - a "lot"  itsjustme   Feb-05-08 07:46 AM   #26 
                       - Like I wrote...  varkam   Feb-05-08 07:37 PM   #33 
                          - well if it isn't a lot  itsjustme   Feb-05-08 08:33 PM   #75 
                             - That's why the study's authors discussed the need for follow-up research  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:34 PM   #77 
                                - I understand  itsjustme   Feb-05-08 09:29 PM   #81 
                                   - That's pretty much the exact opposite conclusion that the scientists came to...  varkam   Feb-05-08 09:38 PM   #82 
                                      - No credible studies support your claims; thats been clearly demonstrated  philb   Feb-05-08 10:57 PM   #93 
                                         - I'm not claiming anything, Bernie.  varkam   Feb-05-08 11:31 PM   #98 
        - "If mercury is no longer in the blood, where is that mercury coming from?"  trotsky   Feb-05-08 07:17 AM   #25 
     - More peer-reviewed study documentation and thousands of clinical cases at post 83, 85  philb   Feb-05-08 10:05 PM   #86 
  - I took 5 minutes to look up the name of the first scientist listed in this study.......  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-04-08 08:02 PM   #2 
  - So your perceived conflict of interest means  cosmik debris   Feb-04-08 09:14 PM   #6 
  - Only if the conflict of interest involves big pharma.  varkam   Feb-04-08 09:24 PM   #8 
  - No.... no.... but it is a MONSTROUS conflict of interest. The man obviously wants....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:11 PM   #27 
     - Are you saying that  cosmik debris   Feb-05-08 07:28 PM   #30 
        - They have cause to because of whom he works for. That's why conflicts of interest are bad.....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:36 PM   #32 
           - But you admit that there is no evidence of wrongdoing?  cosmik debris   Feb-05-08 07:39 PM   #34 
              - No, how could I say there's no evidence of wrongdoing? I haven't investigated it....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:41 PM   #35 
                 - But conflict of interest does not mean that the data is corrupt  cosmik debris   Feb-05-08 07:47 PM   #41 
                    - The manufacturer of the product in question performed his own study. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:48 PM   #42 
                       - The American Academy of Pediatrics didn't have a problem with it  cosmik debris   Feb-05-08 07:59 PM   #47 
                          - The American Academy of Pediatrics is made up of doctors who have had no trouble throughout  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:04 PM   #51 
                             - Ha! They're *all* in on the conspiracy, right?  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:05 PM   #53 
                                - Nonononono. My nephew is a doctor. Doctors are like everyone.....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:10 PM   #60 
                                   - Way to change the subject.  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:13 PM   #64 
                                      - Soooooooooooooooooooooooo.... what is your tremendous interest in defending this  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:16 PM   #68 
                                      - Way to change the subject again.  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:29 PM   #73 
                                      - Broad brush smears are sooooo FUN!  cosmik debris   Feb-05-08 08:17 PM   #69 
  - That would be an ad hominem.  varkam   Feb-04-08 09:25 PM   #9 
     - The links are ad hominems? Is it an ad hominem that he admits he's hired by Thimerosal producers  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:13 PM   #28 
        - Attacking the person instead of the data/argument  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 07:26 PM   #29 
        - Did I? I didn't say, "Dr. so and so is ugly and stupid", I said, "Dr so and so admitted he worked  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:34 PM   #31 
           - I believe that's what that poster meant  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 07:42 PM   #36 
              - No, it qualifies.  varkam   Feb-05-08 07:44 PM   #38 
              - I said there's a conflict of interest. It's the manufacturer testing his own product. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:46 PM   #39 
                 - What's the problem with the data or conclusions?  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 07:55 PM   #43 
                    - That the manufacturer has reasons to play with the results so he doesn't lose money on Thimerosal  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:58 PM   #44 
                       - But that doesn't mean that they did.  varkam   Feb-05-08 07:59 PM   #46 
                       - It's illogical to TRUST any pharmaceutical company to run their own tests on their own already-  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:02 PM   #49 
                          - Thimerosal is neither threatened nor troubled by the science  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:04 PM   #52 
                             - Oh really? Well, I've been watching the articles that came out BEFORE Eli Stone, and afterwards....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:07 PM   #57 
                                - ?  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:09 PM   #59 
                                   - Well? What part do you play in all this? :-) You've peaked my interest.  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:14 PM   #66 
                                      - How am I defending it?  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 08:25 PM   #71 
                                      - It is all about the people, not about the study  cosmik debris   Feb-05-08 08:30 PM   #74 
                                      - Does merely pointing out...  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:33 PM   #76 
                       - So what's the problem with the conclusions?  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 08:06 PM   #55 
        - An ad hominem argument is where you attack the person presenting...  varkam   Feb-05-08 07:43 PM   #37 
           - The manufacturer ran these studies for his own product.. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 07:46 PM   #40 
              - There is, of course, a major difference between...  varkam   Feb-05-08 07:58 PM   #45 
                 - Oh yeah? What's the difference? That in one the CEO himself lies....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:00 PM   #48 
                    - Do you actually have any evidence whatsoever of any wrong-doing?  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:02 PM   #50 
                       - Yes. You mean, as in having to be arrested? I don't know. Are scientists who sell themselves out  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:06 PM   #54 
                          - Oh, you do? Please then, share it with the class.  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:07 PM   #56 
                          - Share what? What exactly are you talking about? And by the way....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:11 PM   #62 
                             - Forget what we were just talking about?  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:15 PM   #67 
                                - But there's something even more interesting.....  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:18 PM   #70 
                                   - I would say the more interesting thing...  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:39 PM   #78 
                                      - Mr. Kool-Aid, you ask me to trust, but I'm very non-trusting, particularly of studies performed by  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 09:09 PM   #79 
                                         - I'm not asking you to trust.  varkam   Feb-05-08 09:27 PM   #80 
                                            - And I'm saying that the probability that this dude was honest in his science is really low nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-06-08 06:51 PM   #107 
                                               - And I'm saying you have not even come close to proving your case.  varkam   Feb-06-08 09:12 PM   #108 
                                                  - There is no case. A test performed by someone who has a bad reputation, is no test at all nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-06-08 09:18 PM   #109 
                                                  - The validity of the test depends on your opinion of the tester?  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 10:07 PM   #110 
                                                  - What if I performed a test? How valid would it be? nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-07-08 06:52 PM   #112 
                                                  - And you know nothing of the research...  varkam   Feb-06-08 11:51 PM   #111 
                                                  - As long as it's the pharmaceutical company in question that is financing he test, it should be  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-07-08 06:53 PM   #113 
                                                  - So you say. eom  varkam   Feb-07-08 08:06 PM   #114 
                          - Where's my beemer?!  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 08:08 PM   #58 
                             - Don't you remember at the last Merckenary conference...  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:11 PM   #61 
                             - Oh now you're trying to make me seem like I said *ALL* scientists sell themselves to corporations  Sarah Ibarruri   Feb-05-08 08:12 PM   #63 
                             - No just being humorous  lizerdbits   Feb-05-08 08:14 PM   #65 
                                - Humour is lost on this one. eom  varkam   Feb-05-08 08:26 PM   #72 
                             - Peer-reviewed doc. showing clear causality in post 125 and 127, and not discredited  philb   Feb-10-08 02:26 PM   #137 
                                - philb debunked right here  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 02:27 PM   #138 
  - Thanks for posting  lizerdbits   Feb-04-08 08:14 PM   #3 
  - Utterly demolishes what little semblance of an "argument" the anti-vax loonies had.  trotsky   Feb-04-08 09:38 PM   #13 
  - Another poorly done study by researchers not familair with mercury effects and the med. literature  philb   Feb-05-08 09:46 PM   #83 
  - You're citing parents' subjective ratings of improvement...  varkam   Feb-05-08 09:51 PM   #84 
  - I cited peer-reviewed studies that clearly indicate this study is poorly done/bogus  philb   Feb-05-08 10:03 PM   #85 
     - You're changing the subject.  varkam   Feb-05-08 10:11 PM   #87 
  - Same bogus shit over and over and over and over and over...  cosmik debris   Feb-06-08 08:06 AM   #105 
     - Its you who can't back up any of your claims; never cite any valid studies  philb   Feb-08-08 05:09 AM   #117 
     - No, it's you who never cites any VALID studies, Bernie/BernieJr.  trotsky   Feb-08-08 07:21 AM   #118 
     - Autoimmune Autism Linked to Thimerosal and Aluminum in Vaccines  philb   Feb-10-08 01:21 PM   #125 
     - You need to be familiar with these definitions.  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 01:24 PM   #126 
        - We're very familiar with chemistry and the scientific method; seems that's more than for you  philb   Feb-10-08 01:44 PM   #129 
           - Your behavior is unhealthy.  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 01:49 PM   #130 
     - Another causal mechanism of vaccine/metal caused neurological damage seen in autistic children  philb   Feb-10-08 01:29 PM   #127 
        - Same link, same obsession, same compulsion, get help.  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 01:31 PM   #128 
           - Again you have't shown anything, and we know by now you apparently can't  philb   Feb-10-08 01:53 PM   #131 
              - You were caught red handed using a fake lab report.  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 01:55 PM   #132 
                 - What are you talking about? You are not talking about me.  philb   Feb-10-08 02:02 PM   #133 
                    - I caught you red handed--a smoking gun  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 02:04 PM   #134 
                       - Not true; your saying so doesn't make it so;  philb   Feb-10-08 02:19 PM   #135 
                          - You're dodging because I caught you using fake documentation  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 02:24 PM   #136 
                             - Absolutely not true. As I said, I have never deliberately tried to mislead anyone  philb   Feb-10-08 02:38 PM   #139 
                                - BUSTED!!!!!  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 02:42 PM   #140 
                                   - I assume this is the same thing as I just explained in the previous post  philb   Feb-10-08 03:13 PM   #142 
                                   - You posted six bogus links  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 03:22 PM   #143 
                                   - Your post has no links so I have no clue what you are talking about  philb   Feb-10-08 05:02 PM   #144 
                                      - The links are yours, and they are BOGUS  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 05:05 PM   #145 
                                         - I looked; none of the links are bogus; some of the Gov't agency links have changed  philb   Feb-10-08 05:54 PM   #146 
                                            - You can not justify this fraud  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 06:59 PM   #147 
                                               - It does support my postion; the report has the DD reference Hg level for with and w/o amalgam  philb   Feb-10-08 09:20 PM   #148 
                                                  - LOL! philb=fraud LOL!  cosmik debris   Feb-10-08 09:27 PM   #149 
  - ...  xchrom   Feb-10-08 08:19 AM   #119 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC