CanSocDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-15-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
|
...the "red herring" is your thesis. It's all you talk about. I think it is all you've got...
.
|
| -Why We Need Science: “I saw it with my own eyes” Is Not Enough |
HuckleB |
Feb-13-11 10:19 AM |
#0 |
 -
Good "I saw Mother Theresa on my toast with my own eyes" doesn't work anymore. |
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel |
Feb-13-11 10:33 AM |
#1 |
  -
Well, I'm not so sure about that. |
HuckleB |
Feb-13-11 10:36 AM |
#3 |
| -
Funny |
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel |
Feb-13-11 10:42 AM |
#4 |
| -
The same applies to religious belief, of course |
DavidDvorkin |
Feb-13-11 10:35 AM |
#2 |
| -
There is a backlash against science and even eggheads |
azul |
Feb-13-11 10:42 AM |
#5 |
| -
Because scientists have to eat too |
jeff47 |
Feb-13-11 04:56 PM |
#12 |
| -
Yes it is entirely irrational. nt |
Codeine |
Feb-19-11 08:32 AM |
#39 |
| -
Can someone explain this phrase: Science is the next politics... |
midnight |
Feb-13-11 12:18 PM |
#6 |
| -
Speaking of YOUR eyes.... |
CanSocDem |
Feb-13-11 02:25 PM |
#7 |
| -
No, I don't think he did |
Confusious |
Feb-13-11 03:44 PM |
#9 |
| -
+1 |
HuckleB |
Feb-13-11 05:32 PM |
#13 |
| -
Again.... |
CanSocDem |
Feb-14-11 04:02 PM |
#15 |
| -
Yeah, I know you're trying to spin it so you can ignore science. |
HuckleB |
Feb-14-11 04:17 PM |
#16 |
| -
Again, you're wrong |
Confusious |
Feb-14-11 06:11 PM |
#17 |
| -
??? |
CanSocDem |
Feb-14-11 06:26 PM |
#18 |
| -
Obviously you do |
Confusious |
Feb-14-11 06:30 PM |
#19 |
| -
"Guess I was wrong."......Yep! |
CanSocDem |
Feb-14-11 07:11 PM |
#20 |
| -
Interesting. |
HuckleB |
Feb-14-11 07:23 PM |
#21 |
| -
Yep! I made it as simple as I could and you still couldn't understand. |
Confusious |
Feb-15-11 02:09 AM |
#26 |
| -
it seems simple to me |
Celebration |
Feb-19-11 08:41 AM |
#40 |
| -
Repeating the same claim has no valid purpose. |
HuckleB |
Feb-19-11 09:07 AM |
#41 |
| -
not a red herring at all |
Celebration |
Feb-19-11 12:19 PM |
#42 |
| -
And again you repeat the same claim, which is nothing but a red herring. |
HuckleB |
Feb-20-11 06:48 PM |
#43 |
| -
Using the term logic while offering a classic red herring is quite humorous. |
HuckleB |
Feb-13-11 05:34 PM |
#14 |
| -
Unfortunately that occurs in 100% of threads debunking sCAM "treatments" |
FLAprogressive |
Feb-13-11 03:21 PM |
#8 |
| -
That's because the plural of "anecdote" is believed to be "data." n/t |
laconicsax |
Feb-13-11 04:05 PM |
#10 |
| -
This is something the "vaccinations caused my kid's Autism" idiots don't understand. |
Odin2005 |
Feb-13-11 04:42 PM |
#11 |
| -
Heh |
BeFree |
Feb-14-11 08:12 PM |
#22 |
| -
Thanks for the pointless red herring. |
HuckleB |
Feb-14-11 09:01 PM |
#23 |
| -
Heh |
BeFree |
Feb-14-11 09:22 PM |
#24 |
| -
Let us know when your science accomplishes anything notable. |
laconicsax |
Feb-15-11 01:58 AM |
#25 |
| -
+1 |
xchrom |
Feb-15-11 05:21 AM |
#27 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Feb-15-11 06:25 AM |
#28 |
| -
Already have |
BeFree |
Feb-15-11 09:14 AM |
#31 |
| -
My, you really are the center of the universe. |
laconicsax |
Feb-15-11 02:04 PM |
#36 |
| -
So you don't know what a red herring is? |
HuckleB |
Feb-15-11 08:56 AM |
#29 |
| -
Ok, I'll play this your stupid game |
BeFree |
Feb-15-11 09:06 AM |
#30 |
| -
Are you saying you don't know what a red herring is? |
HuckleB |
Feb-15-11 10:15 AM |
#32 |
| -
Floor is yours |
BeFree |
Feb-15-11 10:50 AM |
#33 |
| -
I'm not going to waste time explaining something so obvious. |
HuckleB |
Feb-15-11 11:59 AM |
#34 |
| -
Aw c'mon.... |
CanSocDem |
Feb-15-11 01:26 PM |
#35 |
| -
So, when someone offers a red herring, I should pretend it's not a red herring? |
HuckleB |
Feb-15-11 02:13 PM |
#37 |
| -
blah blah blah |
some guy |
Feb-19-11 03:28 AM |
#38 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread