Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #24: More on Scalia's pontificating and arrogant *dump* in Switzerland . . . [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar-30-06 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. More on Scalia's pontificating and arrogant *dump* in Switzerland . . .
Edited on Thu Mar-30-06 01:42 AM by TaleWgnDg
Scalia's one-hour lecture entitled "Does the U.S. legal system work?" given at his alma mater, the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, March 8, 2006, was followed by a Q&A session w/ the attending audience from which Scalia's off-the-wall, arrogant, and pontificating quotations were derived, as well as a subsequent so-called "short" interview.

The sole place where the entire video/audio recording is available is: http://www.bafweb.com/60308scalia.wmv (MSFT .wmv video format, bafweb.com, Scalia at Fribourg University, video of the entire "Does the U.S. legal system work?" lecture, a follow-up Q&A, and a short interview, May 8, 2006; this is a lengthly download). Are there any other websites?


Here's a sampling from the recording (ascertained from various sources):

"Question comes up: Is there a constitutional right to homosexual conduct? Not a hard question for me. It's absolutely clear that nobody ever thought when the Bill of Rights was adopted that it gave a right to homosexual conduct. Homosexual conduct was criminal for 200 years in every state. Easy question."
- Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court, during Q&A following a lecture entitled "Does the U.S. legal system work?" given at his alma mater at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, when queried by a member of the audience, March 8, 2006.
http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid28436.asp

"Foreigners, in foreign countries, have no rights under the American constitution. . . (and that) nobody has ever thought otherwise!"
- Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court, Q&A following a lecture entitled “Does the U.S. legal system work?” given at his alma mater at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, when queried about the constitutional rights of Guantanamo detainees, March 8, 2006.

"If he was captured by my army on a battlefield, that is where he belongs. I had a son on that battlefield and they were shooting at my son. And I'm not about to give this man who was captured in a war a full jury trial. I mean it's crazy."
- Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court, Q&A following a lecture entitled “Does the U.S. legal system work?” given at his alma mater at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, cutting-off a questioner and getting into his own personal life when queried as a justice about Guantanamo detainees receiving a civil court trial instead of facing military tribunals, March 8, 2006.

"I am astounded at the, the, the, I would say, hypocritical reaction in Europe, as though the Europeans always gave trials to people that they capture on the battlefield. I mean, give me a break!"
- Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court, Q&A following a lecture entitled “Does the U.S. legal system work?” given at his alma mater at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, bluntly chastising Europeans about their supposed reactions to Guantanamo detainees, March 8, 2006.

"War is war, and it has never been the case that when you captured a combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts. It's a crazy idea to me!"
- Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court, cutting-off a questioner during a Q&A subsequent to a lecture entitled “Does the U.S. legal system work?” given at his alma mater at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, March 8, 2006.

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/03/scalia-re...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12017271/site/newsweek /
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2... /
http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2006/03/...
http://www.law.com/jsp/dc/PubArticleDC.jsp?id=114346674...
http://www.unifr.ch/main/news/detailD.php?nid=bi69wt46o... (University of Fribourg, Switzerland, in German)

http://www.bafweb.com/60308scalia.wmv (MSFT .wmv video format, bafweb.com, Scalia at Fribourg University, video of the entire "Does the U.S. legal system work?" lecture, a follow-up Q&A, and a short interview, May 8, 2006; this is a lengthly download)

"Scalia Remarks Draw Criticism Before Guantanamo Case," All Things Considered, Monday, March 27, 2006, RealAudio(R) 4:09 minutes, Nina Totenberg, Legal Affairs Correspondent, NPR news
http://www.npr.org/dmg/dmg.php?prgCode=ATC&showDate=27-...
(snippets from Scalia's Q&A following his lecture at Fribourg University)

bio at: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/supreme_court/judge_...
bio at: http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/justices/sc...



For another recent Scalia "bad boy" saga, see: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... . . . wherein Scalia allegedly gives the Sicilian hand-under-the-chin FU gesture:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Scalia: Gays Have No Constitutional Rights dwickham  Mar-29-06 05:34 PM   #0 
   More proof this guy just aint right  Warpy   Mar-29-06 05:37 PM   #1 
   Let's hope he retires AFTER we've got the White House!  FiveGoodMen   Mar-29-06 05:38 PM   #2 
   CJ Taney: Blacks have no rights which the white man is bound to respect  faygokid   Mar-29-06 05:38 PM   #3 
   Is there a 'constitutional right' to heterosexual conduct?  SimpleTrend   Mar-29-06 05:40 PM   #4 
   hahaha...I love that. . .  kevinbgoode   Mar-29-06 11:19 PM   #23 
   marriage is not even mentioned in the Constitution. I have looked.  demigoddess   Mar-30-06 05:02 PM   #38 
   And Blacks were slaves and women couldn't vote  Der Blaue Engel   Mar-29-06 05:41 PM   #5 
   oh boy  sui generis   Mar-29-06 05:42 PM   #6 
   "formally" he is right, but that shows exactly why....  tocqueville   Mar-29-06 05:43 PM   #7 
   Who knows if any of the Framers had a special friend???  MADem   Mar-29-06 05:45 PM   #9 
   no.  cali   Mar-29-06 05:48 PM   #11 
   I'd like to respectfully disagree--  bliss_eternal   Mar-29-06 06:02 PM   #17 
   i disagree  lionesspriyanka   Mar-29-06 07:33 PM   #19 
   Two hundred thirty years of tradition unhampered by progress  acmejack   Mar-29-06 05:50 PM   #12 
   the ''love'' of the document -- or any ''document'' may  xchrom   Mar-30-06 10:09 AM   #28 
   but "modern values" change  Bill McBlueState   Mar-30-06 09:51 AM   #25 
   What a stupid fuck!!!  MADem   Mar-29-06 05:43 PM   #8 
   He needs to be impeached  dbackjon   Mar-29-06 05:46 PM   #10 
   So much for not being an activist judge. Even though Clarence Thomas  cboy4   Mar-29-06 05:50 PM   #13 
   Mmm-hm.  baby_mouse   Mar-29-06 05:50 PM   #14 
   If he kicks off when there is a Democrat in the White House...  long_green   Mar-29-06 05:55 PM   #15 
   BWAHAHAHA...Some of us will be doing that if it happens even before  cboy4   Mar-30-06 11:54 AM   #33 
   Separated at birth  Uncle Zoloft   Mar-29-06 05:59 PM   #16 
   Let's see - gays, non-christians, illegally imprisioned "terrorists"  northofdenali   Mar-29-06 06:15 PM   #18 
   Is this even "true"?  mzteris   Mar-29-06 08:32 PM   #20 
   That's the point  Canuckistanian   Mar-30-06 10:19 AM   #31 
      For 200 years?  mzteris   Mar-30-06 12:08 PM   #35 
   Hey Fat Tony...  libnnc   Mar-29-06 09:12 PM   #21 
   First of all  ruggerson   Mar-29-06 11:11 PM   #22 
   More on Scalia's pontificating and arrogant *dump* in Switzerland . . .  TaleWgnDg   Mar-30-06 01:25 AM   #24 
   Does it say anywhere in the constitution that Constitutional Rights  rman   Mar-30-06 09:54 AM   #26 
   Wow? So they're not American citizens?  shenmue   Mar-30-06 10:05 AM   #27 
   Well then Fat Tony, if they have no constitutional rights, then I guess  bunny planet   Mar-30-06 10:12 AM   #29 
   hmm. freedom of assembly? rights retained by the people?  unblock   Mar-30-06 10:13 AM   #30 
   You know what blows me away about these guys?  Marr   Mar-30-06 11:06 AM   #32 
   I agree. They must have stopped reading before Amendments IX & X.  satya   Mar-30-06 12:00 PM   #34 
   Of course the really ironic thing is that if he had his way...  DarkTirade   Mar-30-06 12:37 PM   #36 
   Mmmmm Hmmmm....or the gas chamber  cboy4   Mar-30-06 01:16 PM   #37 
      I just think the idea of sending someone to prison  DarkTirade   Mar-31-06 03:51 AM   #40 
   And a "faccia di culo" to you, Scalia.  Kurovski   Mar-30-06 06:15 PM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC