Reply #610: Three questions nailed to the fence.

[Pab Sungenis]

1. Are you going to do ANYTHING about the people who are using the DADT repeal as an excuse to ATTACK LGBT*.* posters on DU for being "ungrateful?"

2. A former moderator admitted in the big "mega-thread" in GD that there were biased and "rogue" moderators. She was fired for her truthfulness. Recently you've had another clear example of an anti-gay moderator bias presented to you. You've chosen to sweep it under the rug instead of confront the problem. You've got moderators allowing (even enabling) anti-gay posters using the DADT certification as an excuse to bash the "ungrateful queers" while going out of their way to squash any response to the hatred.

3. The way the anti-gay bias by your moderators has been open and blatant the past few days, should we all fear?