Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-05-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 20. Thanks for saying that better than I could. |
| -Brains of gay men show similarities to those of heterosexual women, study reports |
gorfle |
Jun-05-09 06:11 AM |
#0 |
 -
No Duh... |
trumad |
Jun-05-09 06:23 AM |
#1 |
  -
I know. |
gorfle |
Jun-05-09 07:18 AM |
#2 |
| -
Unfortunately a good portion of anti-gay people... |
DarkTirade |
Jun-05-09 08:01 AM |
#3 |
| -
okay, it SHOULD be a choice |
sui generis |
Jun-05-09 10:03 AM |
#12 |
| -
Thanks for saying that better than I could. |
Chovexani |
Jun-05-09 10:55 AM |
#20 |
| -
Well put, and more accurate than most arguments. |
TheWraith |
Jun-05-09 11:35 AM |
#21 |
| -
Either way. |
gorfle |
Jun-05-09 11:45 AM |
#22 |
| -
Gay de-programming groups use bad science |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 02:13 PM |
#25 |
| -
Snap - Girl...you didn't have to tell me that.... |
LeftHander |
Jun-05-09 08:24 AM |
#4 |
| -
Oh fer fucking out loud |
sui generis |
Jun-05-09 08:34 AM |
#5 |
| -
I did not see anything about that in the article. |
gorfle |
Jun-05-09 08:48 AM |
#6 |
| -
that's my point exactly |
sui generis |
Jun-05-09 09:08 AM |
#7 |
| -
Mmmmmm.......brains.... |
LeftHander |
Jun-05-09 09:26 AM |
#8 |
| -
That was my reaction as well. |
RufusH |
Jun-05-09 09:40 AM |
#9 |
| -
Here's the abstract from the article. |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 10:02 AM |
#11 |
| -
again, it assumes homogeneity in the sample population |
sui generis |
Jun-05-09 10:04 AM |
#13 |
| -
True the assumption is that there are "groups" or cohorts: |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 10:20 AM |
#15 |
| -
I agree with you on this apsect, that the study should lead to further |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 10:45 AM |
#18 |
| -
It's a summary for lay people. |
One_Life_To_Give |
Jun-05-09 10:12 AM |
#14 |
| -
See reply #10 for the original article. I dislike media summaries. |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 10:23 AM |
#16 |
| -
It's always good to go to the original article, here it is . |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 09:57 AM |
#10 |
| -
So they've sort of validated Ulrichs' "Woman's soul" hypothesis |
qb |
Jun-05-09 10:26 AM |
#17 |
| -
Well yeah, we obviously both share the well-documented "shopping gene" |
joeybee12 |
Jun-05-09 10:46 AM |
#19 |
| -
Brains of moralistic heterosexuals show similarities to fecal matter. |
Duncan Grant |
Jun-05-09 01:05 PM |
#23 |
| -
Good question: why study gay neuroanatomy? or gay anything? |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 02:05 PM |
#24 |
| -
The "problem" isn't same-sex attraction, it's that same-sex attraction is pathologized. |
Duncan Grant |
Jun-05-09 05:16 PM |
#28 |
| -
Yes it makes sense. |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-05-09 06:10 PM |
#29 |
| -
Matters because we are Human |
One_Life_To_Give |
Jun-05-09 03:05 PM |
#26 |
| -
Studying the brain is one thing, ascribing gay male sexuality to female-like brains is another. |
Duncan Grant |
Jun-05-09 04:40 PM |
#27 |
| -
Not to mention the right-wing scientists and their "Human Biodiversity Project" |
readmoreoften |
Jun-05-09 06:43 PM |
#30 |
| -
I searched for your previous post on this topic earlier this afternoon. |
Duncan Grant |
Jun-05-09 08:46 PM |
#31 |
| -
Good grief, I hadn't seen this. So, the rightwing is now into science |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-06-09 12:50 AM |
#32 |
| -
A look at and a list of RW "'elite' cadre of scientists " |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-06-09 08:56 AM |
#33 |
| -
From the SPLC: "Queer Science." |
bluedawg12 |
Jun-06-09 09:17 AM |
#34 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread