CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-20-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I don't know. I do know that Republics care nothing about babies |
|
once they are born. They don't care about healthcare, education, public transporation or decent housing. I suppose, they view the "unborn" as potential low wage workers.  |
| -what is the state's interest in a woman's pregnancy? |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 01:25 PM |
#0 |
 -
I don't know. I do know that Republics care nothing about babies |
CottonBear |
Apr-20-07 01:28 PM |
#1 |
| -
More taxpayers? |
Atman |
Apr-20-07 01:29 PM |
#2 |
  -
And cannon fodder. |
no_hypocrisy |
Apr-20-07 01:32 PM |
#3 |
| -
My thoughts exactly ... |
Hepburn |
Apr-20-07 01:42 PM |
#6 |
| -
And laborers |
MountainLaurel |
Apr-20-07 03:37 PM |
#26 |
| -
None |
rock |
Apr-20-07 01:36 PM |
#4 |
| -
well, once it gets off the latest threads page |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 01:39 PM |
#5 |
| -
Actually, in the case of a fetus, I am amazed at the statement... |
Hepburn |
Apr-20-07 01:50 PM |
#7 |
| -
When it comes to women |
Warpy |
Apr-20-07 01:59 PM |
#9 |
| -
I can tell you that I am totally disgusted with this ruling. |
Hepburn |
Apr-20-07 02:12 PM |
#11 |
| -
phew, substance! |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 02:13 PM |
#12 |
| -
What it is going to come down to, IMO, is a test case... |
Hepburn |
Apr-20-07 02:27 PM |
#17 |
| -
For the sake of argument |
One_Life_To_Give |
Apr-20-07 02:31 PM |
#18 |
| -
that's the point I made |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 02:49 PM |
#21 |
| -
Just because 10 states don't have a law |
One_Life_To_Give |
Apr-20-07 03:00 PM |
#24 |
| -
Question, |
Ind4now |
Apr-23-07 05:52 AM |
#41 |
| -
what on earth makes you think a fetus DOES have Constitutional rights? n/t |
Scout |
Apr-23-07 09:37 AM |
#44 |
| -
They really sad thing is |
Megahurtz |
Apr-20-07 05:03 PM |
#29 |
| -
welllll |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 05:08 PM |
#31 |
| -
Lol! |
Megahurtz |
Apr-20-07 05:51 PM |
#33 |
| -
But you know, she's right..... |
foxsux |
Jul-13-07 12:21 AM |
#89 |
| -
Competing interests/rights |
One_Life_To_Give |
Apr-20-07 01:52 PM |
#8 |
| -
One is already human. The other is only a possibility. |
Warpy |
Apr-20-07 02:00 PM |
#10 |
| -
That is what TRULY gets to me.... |
Hepburn |
Apr-20-07 02:14 PM |
#13 |
| -
Their position needs to be understood |
One_Life_To_Give |
Apr-20-07 02:24 PM |
#16 |
| -
that's kind of what I'm asking |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 02:50 PM |
#22 |
| -
Hay, maybe I found someone to talk to about this... |
Ind4now |
Apr-23-07 06:09 AM |
#42 |
| -
not really |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 02:36 PM |
#19 |
| -
Don't think negatives prove the case |
One_Life_To_Give |
Apr-20-07 03:15 PM |
#25 |
| -
hooeee |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 05:05 PM |
#30 |
| -
Your the one who asked |
One_Life_To_Give |
Apr-20-07 05:53 PM |
#34 |
| -
i'm only playing devil's advocate -- because i believe that a woman owns her body. |
xchrom |
Apr-20-07 02:18 PM |
#14 |
| -
clarification |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 02:53 PM |
#23 |
| -
well, without getting into meaningless rhetoric that some pro-lifers get into -- |
xchrom |
Apr-20-07 05:49 PM |
#32 |
| -
My suggestion to American women: |
Deep13 |
Apr-20-07 02:20 PM |
#15 |
| -
My thoughts on the matter |
Ayesha |
Apr-20-07 02:49 PM |
#20 |
| -
very interesting |
iverglas |
Apr-20-07 04:43 PM |
#27 |
| -
states interest cont'd |
Ayesha |
Apr-20-07 09:04 PM |
#35 |
| -
I have to stop you right there again |
iverglas |
Apr-22-07 12:16 PM |
#38 |
| -
Thanks for posting this iverglas! |
Megahurtz |
Apr-20-07 04:50 PM |
#28 |
| -
Potential Life? |
HockeyMom |
Apr-21-07 06:59 AM |
#36 |
| -
Yes and no |
Ayesha |
Apr-21-07 01:12 PM |
#37 |
| -
in a nutshell, indeed |
iverglas |
Apr-22-07 12:23 PM |
#39 |
| -
That is the reason I brought up Griswold |
HockeyMom |
Apr-22-07 04:58 PM |
#40 |
| -
It is vary unfortunate that you live in Canada! |
Ind4now |
Apr-23-07 07:43 AM |
#43 |
| -
not for me! |
iverglas |
Apr-23-07 02:24 PM |
#45 |
| -
Sorry, |
Ind4now |
Apr-24-07 04:47 AM |
#47 |
| -
more |
iverglas |
Apr-23-07 04:11 PM |
#46 |
| -
I would like to start by saying |
Ind4now |
Apr-24-07 07:36 AM |
#48 |
| -
correction: Suicide is not illegal. Assisting in a suicide is illegal, except in OR. -eom |
Justitia |
Apr-26-07 03:26 AM |
#49 |
| -
as I understand it |
iverglas |
Apr-26-07 10:25 AM |
#50 |
| -
Attempted suicide is not prosecuted or punished in any state, it may still be "illegal" in a few |
Justitia |
Apr-26-07 01:30 PM |
#54 |
| -
I know, eh? |
iverglas |
Apr-26-07 01:42 PM |
#55 |
| -
problems |
iverglas |
Apr-26-07 11:19 AM |
#51 |
| -
It's called infanticide... |
joshcryer |
Apr-26-07 11:44 AM |
#52 |
| -
No, anti-choice zealots like YOU call it that. Speak for yourself. -eom |
Justitia |
Apr-26-07 12:58 PM |
#53 |
| -
I had plenty of "pro-choice" people in another thread calling for... |
joshcryer |
Apr-26-07 03:21 PM |
#56 |
| -
So, you are still for forced birth. That's hardly "pro-choice". |
Justitia |
Apr-26-07 03:37 PM |
#57 |
| -
13 weeks is too early, The American Journal of Medicine places it at 20. |
joshcryer |
Apr-26-07 03:51 PM |
#58 |
| -
stick a fork in "viability" |
iverglas |
Apr-26-07 07:12 PM |
#59 |
| -
Your very stats destroy your argument. |
joshcryer |
Apr-26-07 08:40 PM |
#60 |
| -
you are ignorant and nasty |
iverglas |
Apr-27-07 08:09 AM |
#61 |
| -
How am I being ignorant or nasty? |
joshcryer |
Apr-27-07 08:25 PM |
#63 |
| -
abortion is murder, infanticide. I'd call that ignorant and nasty. |
uppityperson |
Apr-29-07 12:14 AM |
#68 |
| -
well, I guess it's a damn good thing it will never happen to YOU, huh? |
Justitia |
Apr-27-07 10:47 AM |
#62 |
| -
I am here to provide constructive debate... |
joshcryer |
Apr-27-07 08:28 PM |
#64 |
| -
I think that perhaps a good "rule of thumb" would be |
Kool Kitty |
Apr-28-07 03:07 AM |
#65 |
| -
I find it unlikely that many here would even consider it my business... |
joshcryer |
Apr-28-07 03:28 PM |
#66 |
| -
I don't expect anything of you, associate with whomever you |
Kool Kitty |
Apr-29-07 12:02 AM |
#67 |
| -
I don't want to know about your reproductive matters. |
joshcryer |
Apr-29-07 12:24 AM |
#69 |
| -
Then take this up with doctors. |
Kool Kitty |
Apr-29-07 12:28 AM |
#70 |
| -
Doctors tend to have to adhere to regulations. |
joshcryer |
Apr-29-07 12:43 AM |
#71 |
| -
No you are not helping the case and you know it |
JetCityLiberal |
Apr-30-07 03:26 PM |
#72 |
| -
ah, there you are |
iverglas |
May-02-07 08:20 PM |
#83 |
| -
I would say it is |
Mr. Blonde |
Apr-30-07 06:21 PM |
#73 |
| -
yes, well |
iverglas |
May-01-07 09:29 AM |
#74 |
| -
I wasn't speaking of |
Mr. Blonde |
May-01-07 02:11 PM |
#75 |
| -
oh well then |
iverglas |
May-01-07 02:36 PM |
#76 |
| -
Wow - so should society be able to force me to have a child? |
lukasahero |
May-01-07 08:16 PM |
#77 |
| -
Lebensborn? |
HockeyMom |
May-02-07 09:56 AM |
#78 |
| -
Indeed, eh? |
iverglas |
May-02-07 11:28 AM |
#79 |
| -
Again, the argument in Griswold |
HockeyMom |
May-02-07 02:21 PM |
#80 |
| -
some of us who were there, even |
iverglas |
May-02-07 03:15 PM |
#81 |
| -
Indeed. I was at the end of no bc for unmarried women, no legal abs unless had money. |
uppityperson |
May-02-07 03:43 PM |
#82 |
| -
The state's interest is in preventing the killing of human beings |
DemBones DemBones |
Jun-27-07 07:41 AM |
#84 |
| -
nice anti-choice rant, however you have not said what the state's interest IS... |
Scout |
Jun-27-07 09:17 AM |
#85 |
| -
after seeing some of the posts here this AM |
musette_sf |
Jun-27-07 01:24 PM |
#86 |
| -
You took the words |
dancingAlone |
Jun-27-07 07:31 PM |
#87 |
| -
Please Leave Anti-Choice Views |
iverglas |
Jul-01-07 09:49 AM |
#88 |
| -
From my own observations, it seems the state is quite comfortable with |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-29-07 10:44 PM |
#92 |
| -
To answer your original question, sort of..... |
foxsux |
Jul-13-07 12:24 AM |
#90 |
| -
Let's look at the VATICAN's interest . . . and they're recognized as a state -- !!!! |
defendandprotect |
Jul-28-07 10:10 PM |
#91 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread