Iggo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-13-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
| 33. After further review, I agree. |
|
He did not maintain possession.
|
| -Detroit Lions get robbed. |
Bluzmann57 |
Sep-12-10 03:20 PM |
#0 |
-
There are many rules in college not the same as the NFL |
LiberalFighter |
Sep-12-10 03:25 PM |
#1 |
 -
It's the same rule in all levels. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 06:49 PM |
#19 |
-
What about players who strut in and spike the ball? |
1gobluedem |
Sep-12-10 03:28 PM |
#2 |
 -
They had complete control of the ball while entering the end zone. |
LiberalFighter |
Sep-12-10 03:29 PM |
#3 |
  -
Calvin Johnson caught the ball and had two feet down |
1gobluedem |
Sep-12-10 03:31 PM |
#4 |
 -
It would be if he had stayed on his feet and voluntarily dropped the ball. |
LiberalFighter |
Sep-12-10 04:08 PM |
#6 |
 -
He had full control |
1gobluedem |
Sep-12-10 04:22 PM |
#8 |
 -
I believe there was a ruling like that |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-12-10 06:25 PM |
#10 |
  -
Mmmmm.....it was a catch |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:30 PM |
#47 |
 -
It was one fluid movement. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 02:04 PM |
#57 |
 -
The rule is "invoked" on every single pass thrown. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 06:44 PM |
#15 |
 -
Example? |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 06:37 PM |
#13 |
 -
He didn't have possession pre-endzone. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-12-10 06:41 PM |
#14 |
-
Yup... |
one_voice |
Sep-12-10 03:54 PM |
#5 |
-
Another Bad Call |
RockaFowler |
Sep-12-10 04:14 PM |
#7 |
 -
They called it correctly according to the rule. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-12-10 06:26 PM |
#11 |
-
It looks like it would have been a TD if the player tucked the ball. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 06:45 PM |
#16 |
 -
Yep |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-12-10 06:46 PM |
#17 |
-
I wondered if he set it down too. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 06:47 PM |
#18 |
-
No, they didn't. |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:00 PM |
#37 |
-
It was a good call.. |
Upton |
Sep-12-10 06:24 PM |
#9 |
 -
Agree--- |
trumad |
Sep-13-10 06:50 AM |
#28 |
-
It was a good call. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 06:36 PM |
#12 |
-
Ten to one if it had been the Patriots, Colts, Saints, or Packers |
1gobluedem |
Sep-12-10 06:54 PM |
#20 |
 -
I understand your frustration. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-12-10 06:56 PM |
#21 |
  -
Winning teams get the calls |
1gobluedem |
Sep-12-10 07:07 PM |
#22 |
  -
I don't think you do understand the frustatration |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:01 PM |
#38 |
 -
When did I take a cheap shot at the Lions? |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 01:22 PM |
#43 |
 -
+1 |
UrbScotty |
Sep-13-10 03:09 PM |
#82 |
-
It may have been a good call, but the rule really sucks |
Poiuyt |
Sep-12-10 07:15 PM |
#23 |
 -
I don't think the RB vs WR comparison is valid. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-12-10 07:23 PM |
#25 |
-
And that's even more interesting. |
trotsky |
Sep-13-10 07:04 AM |
#29 |
-
Well I say he had possession when he caught the ball with two hands, |
Poiuyt |
Sep-13-10 01:40 PM |
#48 |
-
So you don't want refs held to a literal interpretation of the rules? |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 02:05 PM |
#59 |
-
Tecnically Bush never said saddam was Al Queida |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 02:40 PM |
#76 |
-
Just like the tuck rule, the right call but for a bad rule. |
Forkboy |
Sep-12-10 07:22 PM |
#24 |
 -
It's actually a good rule. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-12-10 07:26 PM |
#26 |
-
I'm trying to be nice here! |
Forkboy |
Sep-12-10 07:36 PM |
#27 |
-
So......when the Notre Dame player dropped the ball before he got to the endzone |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:12 PM |
#39 |
-
I saw that too |
JonLP24 |
Sep-13-10 01:17 PM |
#42 |
-
Just saying...... |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:25 PM |
#44 |
-
Same exact thing as the Tuck Rule. |
Iggo |
Sep-13-10 07:47 AM |
#30 |
 -
But the tuck rule is a poor comparison. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 08:06 AM |
#31 |
-
After further review, I agree. |
Iggo |
Sep-13-10 10:14 AM |
#33 |
-
A couple of thoughts |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 09:46 AM |
#32 |
-
But the rule doesn't say that |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 11:26 AM |
#34 |
 -
did he catch it or not? |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 12:12 PM |
#35 |
-
I don't think you want refs making calls based on that. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 12:44 PM |
#36 |
 -
do you think he caught it? |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 01:13 PM |
#40 |
-
No. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 01:16 PM |
#41 |
-
fair enough |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 01:27 PM |
#45 |
-
The Bears' announcers (on the radio) thought it was a catch, also |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:28 PM |
#46 |
 -
It's pretty evident it was a catch |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 01:41 PM |
#49 |
  -
Evident to everyone except the refs, the league, and the rulebook. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:01 PM |
#54 |
 -
By all means, let's go by what announcers say. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 02:08 PM |
#60 |
 -
If you watched the end of the game.. |
Upton |
Sep-13-10 02:17 PM |
#66 |
-
Is your player friend a referee? |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 01:59 PM |
#53 |
 -
he is a superior athlete |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 02:33 PM |
#73 |
-
So he is not a referee |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:49 PM |
#79 |
 -
actually he is very familiar |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 03:10 PM |
#83 |
-
The ref closest to the play will get marked down for two things |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 03:15 PM |
#85 |
-
Well McNabb is a more accomplished player than your friend |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 03:13 PM |
#84 |
-
I thought it was pretty clear I didn't think it was a catch. Sorry. |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 02:01 PM |
#55 |
-
No |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 01:56 PM |
#51 |
-
The NFL does not use full time referees. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 01:56 PM |
#50 |
-
Can you honestly tell me, if it had been Dallas, or the Colts |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 01:57 PM |
#52 |
 -
Yes, completely honestly. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:02 PM |
#56 |
-
I've watched the replay a dozen times |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 02:05 PM |
#58 |
 -
Watch the catch-no catch video on this site. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:09 PM |
#61 |
  -
Not the rules knowledge.....the fact that he maintained control |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 02:17 PM |
#65 |
   -
Here's where I think it went wrong. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:22 PM |
#69 |
  -
I can't log into that either |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 02:18 PM |
#67 |
 -
Then you don't understand the rule. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:23 PM |
#70 |
 -
Yeah, no way a ref would make a game ending call against the Cowboys |
Goblinmonger |
Sep-13-10 02:12 PM |
#64 |
-
PS, also, that video wouldn't load |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 02:10 PM |
#62 |
-
I understand the emotion of the situation. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:20 PM |
#68 |
-
When does the league ever disagree with the refs? |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 02:31 PM |
#72 |
-
They DID get it right.. |
Upton |
Sep-13-10 02:38 PM |
#74 |
 -
We'll have to agree to disagree then |
LisaM |
Sep-13-10 02:41 PM |
#77 |
-
All the time. |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 03:00 PM |
#80 |
-
They tend not to be avearge joes |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 02:11 PM |
#63 |
-
They are not in poverty, but that's for one reason |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:28 PM |
#71 |
-
everyone is tempted by bribes |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 02:38 PM |
#75 |
-
You heard it in your own mind |
Renew Deal |
Sep-13-10 02:49 PM |
#78 |
-
you didn't catch the sarcasm |
wilt the stilt |
Sep-13-10 03:06 PM |
#81 |