You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #94: I'm not sure exactly what you're questioning, but here are some facts. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #93
94. I'm not sure exactly what you're questioning, but here are some facts.
Yes, almost all the names of people and places in Genesis are symbolic, often for humorous or sarcastic, as well as historical, purposes in the story. The names are an integral part of the story -- as they often are in the stories of all oral, relational cultures.

The names are part of the drama, part of the meaning of the story. This is not at all remarkable, but is a common feature of Semitic culture, as well as most non-western peoples of the world.

The Human
Thus Adam is the Hebrew word for "Human" -- "God created the Human..., he created them male and female" (Gen. 1:27). Then the Hebrew words for male person (man) and female person (woman) are used for the two individuals. Even these words form a poetic pair, as they would be in many languages that note gender in their word forms: ish-man, isha-woman.

The Life
The name of the female is Hawa, the Hebrew word for Life. Thus in the oral, poetic beauty of the story, captured in writing to hand down for the generations, we are told Human married Life and they had children. Yes, this powerful testimonial symbolism to God's plan is very difficult to adequately translate into other languages.

Traditional English translators have done us a great disservice, by transliterating the words/names, instead of translating their full, rich meaning to bring out the dynamic story in the names of people and places!
http://orvillejenkins.com/languages/hebreworiginal.html



http://www.lhhpaleo.religionstatistics.net/LHH%20neolit...
http://www.jerusalemites.org/jerusalem/cultural_dimensi...
http://bahai-library.com/?file=stockman_notes_judaism
http://www.ethnologue.com/family_index.asp
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts-jews.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"Why Women Need the Goddess" bloom  Oct-18-06 11:49 AM   #0 
  - thank you so much for sharing this. the patriarchal, abrahamic  niyad   Oct-18-06 11:52 AM   #1 
  - LOL........I thought your thread was about Judy Tununa  buff2   Oct-18-06 11:54 AM   #2 
  - do you mean judy tenuda?  niyad   Oct-18-06 12:14 PM   #7 
  - I see no need for any fictional cloud being  grizmaster   Oct-18-06 11:57 AM   #3 
  - It's a cultural thing  bloom   Oct-18-06 12:10 PM   #5 
  - why must the symbol for life & wisdom be female? (or male for that matter)  grizmaster   Oct-18-06 12:25 PM   #9 
     - You may or may not know  bloom   Oct-18-06 12:57 PM   #12 
        - that tree of knowledge was a tricky deal  grizmaster   Oct-18-06 01:16 PM   #13 
        - What about Mary?  TallahasseeGrannie   Oct-18-06 06:02 PM   #16 
        - I realize that for some people  bloom   Oct-18-06 07:43 PM   #17 
           - Choice of Scripture readings  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-18-06 10:24 PM   #19 
           - It's the oldest struggle in the world  TallahasseeGrannie   Oct-19-06 11:39 AM   #23 
        - No, Eve is "life". Adam is "man"(humanity) . nt  greyl   Oct-18-06 07:56 PM   #18 
           - That is the simplified view  bloom   Oct-19-06 09:27 AM   #21 
              - No, not simplified. Accurate. To the point. True.  greyl   Oct-21-06 12:39 AM   #31 
              - The archaeology does not bear this out.  okasha   Oct-21-06 09:39 AM   #34 
                 - Show me.  greyl   Nov-13-06 07:04 AM   #92 
                    - And the lack of proof cannot be taken as proof either!  TRYPHO   Nov-13-06 07:09 PM   #93 
                       - I'm not sure exactly what you're questioning, but here are some facts.  greyl   Nov-14-06 03:05 AM   #94 
                          - I'm NOT about to start a flame war but..  TRYPHO   Nov-25-06 05:04 PM   #105 
              - On the symbolism of the serpent,  okasha   Oct-21-06 10:04 AM   #35 
  - Why do we speak when pointing and grunting might suffice?  realpolitik   Oct-18-06 12:12 PM   #6 
  - I love Laurie Anderson (but I'd still rather see your face)  grizmaster   Oct-18-06 12:20 PM   #8 
  - We do like ritual, don't we?  TallahasseeGrannie   Oct-18-06 06:00 PM   #15 
  - The strength of Polytheism  realpolitik   Oct-18-06 12:02 PM   #4 
  - very powerfully put  grizmaster   Oct-18-06 12:27 PM   #10 
  - This is what I have come to  realpolitik   Oct-19-06 12:25 PM   #24 
  - polytheism, etc.  bloom   Oct-18-06 12:50 PM   #11 
     - I agree  realpolitik   Oct-19-06 12:27 PM   #25 
  - In case you missed it:  bloom   Oct-18-06 02:07 PM   #14 
  - Well, that's all well and good...  Chulanowa   Oct-19-06 02:22 AM   #20 
  - From what I've noticed  bloom   Oct-19-06 09:42 AM   #22 
  - Plain ol' atheism just seems easier, lol.  Evoman   Oct-19-06 02:00 PM   #26 
  - A lot of people  bloom   Oct-20-06 09:25 AM   #27 
     - I agree with this  Evoman   Oct-20-06 01:11 PM   #28 
     - I agree that it is more confrontational.  bloom   Oct-20-06 02:09 PM   #29 
        - Fine, fine...your right.  Evoman   Oct-20-06 02:19 PM   #30 
     - The "idea" that we need to replace one religion with another is stupid and  beam me up scottie   Oct-21-06 02:14 AM   #32 
     - I prefer gender-neutral divinity  Chulanowa   Oct-21-06 02:40 AM   #33 
        - "tacking an "-ess" onto the concept of "God"  bloom   Oct-21-06 10:32 PM   #36 
           - I agree, really  Chulanowa   Oct-22-06 03:45 AM   #37 
              - It's about the symbolism.  bloom   Oct-22-06 11:02 AM   #38 
                 - You're attacking him because he's a man even though he's a true feminist?  beam me up scottie   Oct-22-06 03:39 PM   #39 
                 - So the woman is to be greater than the man?  Chulanowa   Oct-22-06 03:39 PM   #40 
                 - Mostly, I'm just esp. offended  bloom   Oct-23-06 08:29 PM   #45 
                    - We're still missing parthenogenisis, ma'am  Chulanowa   Oct-26-06 02:21 PM   #57 
                       - I suppose  bloom   Oct-31-06 08:35 AM   #81 
                          - Sexism.  trotsky   Oct-31-06 09:07 AM   #83 
                          - I'm aware that there are plenty of women  bloom   Oct-31-06 09:31 AM   #84 
                             - So are you retracting your previous statement, then?  trotsky   Oct-31-06 09:34 AM   #85 
                                - I think that there is a conjunction  bloom   Oct-31-06 10:23 AM   #86 
                                   - But that's not what you said.  trotsky   Oct-31-06 11:30 AM   #87 
                                      - "You crave absolutes."  bloom   Oct-31-06 11:42 AM   #88 
                                         - You can keep saying it.  trotsky   Oct-31-06 11:44 AM   #89 
                                            - At least as far as this particular forum goes  bloom   Oct-31-06 02:07 PM   #90 
                                               - Say what?  trotsky   Oct-31-06 02:17 PM   #91 
                          - Nobody on the pedestal sounds good to me  Chulanowa   Nov-14-06 06:18 AM   #96 
                             - I agree with much of your post, but strongly disagree with  greyl   Nov-14-06 12:56 PM   #97 
                                - Evolutionarily speaking, we're a dud.  Chulanowa   Nov-14-06 04:47 PM   #98 
                                   - And just as a note...  Chulanowa   Nov-14-06 04:50 PM   #99 
                                   - "Do you give a damn whether a hundred generations from now..."  bloom   Nov-14-06 09:12 PM   #100 
                                      - We've got life left in us yet  Chulanowa   Nov-15-06 03:52 PM   #102 
                 - Umm... a small problem here.  salvorhardin   Oct-22-06 11:16 PM   #41 
                 - Your knowledge of Hinduism seems lacking  muriel_volestrangler   Oct-23-06 08:26 AM   #43 
                 - bloom is probably referring  okasha   Oct-23-06 09:55 AM   #44 
                 - There's a lot of variations on the basics.  Chulanowa   Oct-26-06 02:30 PM   #58 
                    - I was mostly picturing some art that I had seen  bloom   Oct-31-06 08:48 AM   #82 
                 - While I Don't Agree In Principle With Much Of What You Say  Southpawkicker   Oct-25-06 10:23 PM   #48 
                    - You don't have to worry about being just a sperm donor  neebob   Oct-26-06 08:10 AM   #53 
                       - LOL  Southpawkicker   Oct-26-06 08:39 PM   #60 
  - Women need education and income  neebob   Oct-23-06 02:55 AM   #42 
  - Thank you, neebob. You'd think that would be obvious.  beam me up scottie   Oct-25-06 12:02 AM   #46 
  - Thanks, BMUS  neebob   Oct-25-06 10:06 AM   #47 
     - But that would be anti-woman!  beam me up scottie   Oct-26-06 09:56 PM   #63 
        - Well, then why aren't we tackling the men and smearing THEIR faces?  neebob   Oct-27-06 01:43 AM   #68 
           - Brilliant!  beam me up scottie   Oct-27-06 01:49 AM   #69 
              - It's already called MENstruation.  neebob   Oct-27-06 02:14 AM   #70 
  - Very good points  Southpawkicker   Oct-25-06 10:24 PM   #49 
     - People I know  bloom   Oct-25-06 11:11 PM   #50 
     - Oh, for pete's sake  neebob   Oct-25-06 11:59 PM   #51 
     - I see the article as being about women  bloom   Oct-26-06 09:13 AM   #55 
     - Oh brother. Oops, how "anti-woman" of me, I meant to say oh sister.  beam me up scottie   Oct-26-06 08:47 PM   #61 
     - There are no goddesses either, bloom  neebob   Oct-27-06 12:40 AM   #65 
        - Rituals in Context  bloom   Oct-28-06 11:36 AM   #72 
           - Okay, since you're putting so much effort into convincing me  neebob   Oct-28-06 02:55 PM   #73 
              - I don't care if you're convinced or not  bloom   Oct-28-06 05:52 PM   #74 
                 - It is more stupid than a lot of things people do  neebob   Oct-29-06 10:23 AM   #75 
                    - I don't know why you are assuming  bloom   Oct-29-06 10:35 PM   #76 
                       - Yes, well, you can't seem to resist making it personal  neebob   Oct-29-06 11:42 PM   #77 
                       - You seem to have to assume that there is "magical thinking".  bloom   Oct-30-06 08:09 AM   #79 
                          - Right, it's not magical thinking because the goddess doesn't exist.  neebob   Oct-30-06 08:46 AM   #80 
                       - What she's doing, bloom, is called THINKING. That's what real feminists do.  beam me up scottie   Oct-30-06 12:49 AM   #78 
     - Hey! How dare you use a male gender based phrase to express your exasperation?  beam me up scottie   Oct-26-06 07:46 PM   #59 
        - Oh, for Priscalla's sake!  Random_Australian   Oct-26-06 08:57 PM   #62 
        - Sounds tasty, I'll be right over.  beam me up scottie   Oct-26-06 09:58 PM   #64 
        - Oh, I thought I was sticking it to the man  neebob   Oct-27-06 12:54 AM   #66 
           - That works too.  beam me up scottie   Oct-27-06 01:28 AM   #67 
     - I believe you, BUT...  Finder   Oct-26-06 09:11 AM   #54 
        - symbolism & rituals /religion  bloom   Oct-26-06 09:22 AM   #56 
     - Agreed!  neebob   Oct-26-06 12:06 AM   #52 
  - I don't care if its a god or goddess, as long as it ain't white.  Evoman   Oct-27-06 03:51 AM   #71 
  - They don't. They need to be treated like goddesses.  greyl   Nov-14-06 03:10 AM   #95 
  - "When the actual women of a culture...  bloom   Nov-14-06 09:40 PM   #101 
  - But are cultures with goddesses matriarchal or gender egalitarian?  Nikia   Nov-18-06 05:21 PM   #103 
     - cultures  bloom   Nov-18-06 08:32 PM   #104 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC