93. Assuming you read my previous posts, let me state it this way.
Of course adding a god as 'first cause' doesn't really help matters. Does that really give any more of a 'reason' other than 'it had to happen because them's the rules'? Just shifts the entire debate to what this god fellow is all about.
Right, the existence of god doesn't give any more of a reason for a "first cause" than than the argument "it had to happen because them's the rules" does. Both stances make little sense. Therefore, I don't know, noone does. That is my point. Saying for certain that god DOES OR DOES NOT exist implies that the person making the assertion knows that to be true.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(717 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
