You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #55: Yes, I applied the word "knowledge"... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Yes, I applied the word "knowledge"...
...but I did not equate it to awareness. You did that, and have yet to justify it.

And 'awareness' isn't paranoia or fear.

And this is apropos to what? I get the impression that you're conversing with your own private demons, of which my words were only a reminder.

I feel sad for you. When we all become inanimate robots that digest information like a computer it will be time for me to die. Not a world I want to live in.

More private demons of yours, it would seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -What does it mean to "know" something? To have knowledge? Silent3  Nov-25-11 02:12 PM   #0 
  - Whuuut?  geckosfeet   Nov-25-11 02:30 PM   #1 
  - It is certainly one function of myth  skepticscott   Nov-25-11 03:09 PM   #7 
  - There's a difference between a path to knowledge and knowledge itself  Silent3   Nov-25-11 04:00 PM   #22 
     - Debating the correctness of other ways of knowing, comes down to, in the end,  geckosfeet   Nov-25-11 04:10 PM   #27 
        - Why "(knowledge)" parenthetically after the word "beliefs"?  Silent3   Nov-25-11 04:33 PM   #29 
           - You are right. At the root, contradiction is the only truth.  geckosfeet   Nov-25-11 08:26 PM   #48 
              - That's different perception, not different knowledge.  Silent3   Nov-25-11 11:07 PM   #56 
                 - Because individual knowledge is completely dependent upon perception.  geckosfeet   Nov-26-11 08:04 AM   #61 
                    - I hardly expect to reach "the final word"  Silent3   Nov-26-11 10:34 AM   #66 
                       - How does one obtain  rrneck   Nov-26-11 11:46 AM   #70 
                          - It's a social process  Silent3   Nov-26-11 02:57 PM   #81 
                             - Can that experience be measured empirically? nt  rrneck   Nov-26-11 03:06 PM   #83 
                                - What do you mean by "measuring" an experience?  Silent3   Nov-26-11 03:28 PM   #84 
                                   - The term "knowledge" seems quite simple to me.  rrneck   Nov-26-11 04:03 PM   #85 
                                      - "If you know something, it's knowledge" is uselessly circular.  Silent3   Nov-26-11 04:23 PM   #86 
                                         - Why did you post the OP? nt  rrneck   Nov-26-11 06:55 PM   #89 
                                            - In response to much talk over time in R/T...  Silent3   Nov-26-11 07:33 PM   #90 
                                               - Why did you decide it would be interesting? nt  rrneck   Nov-26-11 07:42 PM   #91 
                                                  - Am I going to get billed for this?  Silent3   Nov-26-11 08:42 PM   #92 
                                                     - Good. This is walking the fine between sohphism and nonsense.  geckosfeet   Nov-27-11 12:48 PM   #96 
                                                     - You intrepret your feelings correctly.  rrneck   Nov-27-11 01:03 PM   #97 
                                                     - A "bat" can be a flying mammal or a thing you hit a baseball with  Silent3   Nov-27-11 01:23 PM   #98 
                                                     - So you disregard information  rrneck   Nov-27-11 01:57 PM   #99 
                                                     - Huh?  Silent3   Nov-27-11 02:05 PM   #100 
                                                     - Whatever you want to do.  rrneck   Nov-27-11 02:21 PM   #101 
                                                     - Somehow, according to a heated PM conversation I've been given leave...  Silent3   Nov-27-11 10:07 PM   #102 
                                                     - *sigh*  rrneck   Nov-28-11 04:14 AM   #103 
                                                     - Considering that whole books are written on the subject of epistemology...  Silent3   Nov-28-11 06:34 PM   #104 
                                                     - So how can individual introspection be universally true? nt  rrneck   Nov-28-11 07:04 PM   #105 
                                                     - What part of individual introspection?  Silent3   Nov-28-11 07:31 PM   #106 
                                                     - Should individual introspection be considered universally true?  rrneck   Nov-28-11 07:35 PM   #107 
                                                     - Again, I have to ask, that it occurs...  Silent3   Nov-28-11 07:44 PM   #108 
                                                     - Nope. You got out again.  rrneck   Nov-28-11 07:51 PM   #109 
                                                     - I didn't "get out", I honestly can't figure out...  Silent3   Nov-28-11 08:08 PM   #110 
                                                     - Maybe this will help.  rrneck   Nov-28-11 08:11 PM   #111 
                                                     - I know the meaning of the word.  Silent3   Nov-28-11 08:16 PM   #112 
                                                     - LOL!  rrneck   Nov-28-11 08:23 PM   #113 
                                                     - If I make up *an* introspection, a particular instance of introspection...  Silent3   Nov-28-11 08:36 PM   #114 
                                                     - Is your intorspection universally true? nt  rrneck   Nov-28-11 08:39 PM   #115 
                                                     - That I engage in introspection is likely true.  Silent3   Nov-28-11 08:57 PM   #116 
                                                     - Did your introspection actually occur?  rrneck   Nov-28-11 09:02 PM   #117 
                                                     - As an event in time?  Silent3   Nov-28-11 09:33 PM   #118 
                                                     - Then what make your candidate true?  rrneck   Nov-28-11 10:59 PM   #119 
                                                     - Nothing absolutely makes it true.  Silent3   Nov-28-11 11:29 PM   #120 
                                                     - Well, I guess I was wrong.  rrneck   Nov-29-11 12:20 AM   #121 
                                                     - So, what were you digging for?  Silent3   Nov-29-11 09:45 AM   #123 
                                                     - I'm not digging at all.  rrneck   Nov-29-11 11:12 AM   #124 
                                                     - Can you verify your own self awareness to anyone but yourself?  Silent3   Nov-29-11 12:21 PM   #125 
                                                     - My thoughts are my own  rrneck   Nov-29-11 01:40 PM   #126 
                                                     - Thoughts that are yours and yours alone don't have much impact  Silent3   Nov-29-11 03:02 PM   #127 
                                                     - Does a thought have to be communicated to another  rrneck   Nov-29-11 03:47 PM   #128 
                                                     - Answer a few of my questions first...  Silent3   Nov-29-11 03:55 PM   #129 
                                                     - Feeling cornered again?  rrneck   Nov-29-11 04:08 PM   #130 
                                                     - You're just being lazy now.  Silent3   Nov-29-11 04:20 PM   #131 
                                                     - Can't do it huh? nt  rrneck   Nov-29-11 05:15 PM   #132 
                                                     - I just had a thought...  Silent3   Nov-29-11 05:52 PM   #133 
                                                     - Okay. nt  rrneck   Nov-29-11 06:22 PM   #134 
                                                     - Now we all understand  Silent3   Nov-29-11 08:54 PM   #135 
                                                     - Gah! I love it! And I have knowledge of a funny image. nt  rrneck   Nov-29-11 09:09 PM   #136 
  - Awareness  postatomic   Nov-25-11 02:35 PM   #2 
  - If the word "knowledge" is difficult to apply, then why apply it?  Silent3   Nov-25-11 03:32 PM   #15 
     - You were the one applying the word 'knowledge'  postatomic   Nov-25-11 10:39 PM   #54 
        - Yes, I applied the word "knowledge"...  Silent3   Nov-25-11 11:01 PM   #55 
           - You make many assumptions  postatomic   Nov-26-11 04:35 PM   #87 
              - "You make many assumptions"  Silent3   Nov-26-11 05:37 PM   #88 
  - What an utterly FANTASTIC post! Heads are exploding right now!  cleanhippie   Nov-25-11 02:36 PM   #3 
  - As interesting as all of this is  skepticscott   Nov-25-11 02:53 PM   #4 
  - Very well stated. I was wondering where you had found that, but I  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 02:56 PM   #5 
  - The major problem here is that graduate courses in "other ways of knowing" are  humblebum   Nov-25-11 03:06 PM   #6 
  - That is a major problem.  Silent3   Nov-25-11 03:16 PM   #9 
  - What it proves is that your opinion is definitely not universally accepted. Here's one:  humblebum   Nov-25-11 03:22 PM   #11 
     - Calling something  skepticscott   Nov-25-11 03:25 PM   #13 
     - And listening to someone swear up and down it ain't so, in spite of  humblebum   Nov-25-11 03:31 PM   #14 
        - OPINIONS? I thought the topic was "knowledge", not opinion.  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 03:35 PM   #17 
           - I am referring to the "opinions" or "convictions" or "understandings" (whatever  humblebum   Nov-25-11 03:41 PM   #18 
              - I am usually quite amenable to respecting "opinions" or "understandings" that can be  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 04:07 PM   #25 
                 - Did you type that post? nt  rrneck   Nov-25-11 07:51 PM   #43 
                 - You don't see because you don't want to see. And you are the one who claimed  humblebum   Nov-25-11 08:13 PM   #46 
     - If either you or Jodie Wear-Leiker would like to elaborate...  Silent3   Nov-25-11 03:48 PM   #20 
     - Who? nt  humblebum   Nov-25-11 04:03 PM   #23 
        - She's the one who apparently teaches that course...  Silent3   Nov-25-11 04:05 PM   #24 
           - How much more substance do you need? There are many institutions  humblebum   Nov-25-11 04:13 PM   #28 
              - What do I care about universal acceptance?  Silent3   Nov-25-11 04:36 PM   #30 
                 - Have fun on your island. nt  humblebum   Nov-25-11 08:10 PM   #45 
                    - Once again...  Silent3   Nov-25-11 11:20 PM   #57 
                       - You have now resorted to using buzz words in an attempt to appear  humblebum   Nov-26-11 12:44 AM   #59 
                          - Of course many people don't think like me.  Silent3   Nov-26-11 10:02 AM   #65 
                             - Over the past few weeks, you and others have been supplied  humblebum   Nov-26-11 11:38 AM   #69 
                             - Again, you refer elsewhere and don't speak for yourself  Silent3   Nov-26-11 11:49 AM   #71 
                                - You are showing that you have seen, but rejected the information you  humblebum   Nov-26-11 12:01 PM   #72 
                                - Then tell me what IN YOUR OPINION, with YOUR OWN analysis...  Silent3   Nov-26-11 12:07 PM   #73 
                                   - That "cozy little paradigm" rejects any method, or epistemology, or any  humblebum   Nov-26-11 12:20 PM   #74 
                                      - My OP clearly denies your claim about "near 100% objective proof".  Silent3   Nov-26-11 02:48 PM   #79 
                                - An excellent summary of what has, and has NOT been presented as...  MarkCharles   Nov-26-11 02:59 PM   #82 
                             - An excellent statement of what is going on here, well done! n/t  MarkCharles   Nov-26-11 02:53 PM   #80 
     - From THIS school? Professors in philosophy of religion?  cleanhippie   Nov-25-11 03:53 PM   #21 
        - If it was only one institution or one person teaching courses like this,  humblebum   Nov-25-11 04:07 PM   #26 
  - Sure there are  skepticscott   Nov-25-11 03:23 PM   #12 
  - There are several threads about this - why start a new one?  bananas   Nov-25-11 03:16 PM   #8 
  - So alert.  laconicsax   Nov-25-11 03:16 PM   #10 
  - There's a double-standard at play. nt  bananas   Nov-25-11 03:44 PM   #19 
     - Then take it to ATA. n/t  laconicsax   Nov-25-11 08:05 PM   #44 
  - You are free not to read or participate, if the topic doesn't interest you, or  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 03:32 PM   #16 
  - No existing thread on this subject used the particular approach...  Silent3   Nov-25-11 04:42 PM   #31 
     - I am so glad you did, and appreciate the incredibly valiant effort.  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 04:50 PM   #32 
        - There must be quite a few people quietly annoyed by my OP...  Silent3   Nov-25-11 04:59 PM   #33 
           - Lots of people seem to object to logical analysis when it comes to their  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 05:03 PM   #34 
  - Did the Ptolemaic system constitute knowledge?  Jim__   Nov-25-11 06:45 PM   #35 
  - Did it later get confirmed by others working independently of Ptolemy?  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 06:56 PM   #36 
  - One day in the future people will be amused at our quaint notions of quantum physics.  rug   Nov-25-11 07:17 PM   #37 
     - Are we "amused" by Newton's "quaint" notions of gravity, and momentum?  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 07:26 PM   #38 
     - I am amused by smug certitude.  rug   Nov-25-11 07:32 PM   #39 
        - If you view the scientific process and discipline as "smug", try reading  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 07:39 PM   #41 
           - I don't view a scientific process as smug; I view people who cling to it as a sine qua non to be.  rug   Nov-25-11 07:51 PM   #42 
              - I didn't miss a thing, I know the guy who made the video.  MarkCharles   Nov-25-11 08:14 PM   #47 
                 - If you indeed know him you should have a talk.  rug   Nov-25-11 09:46 PM   #51 
                    - I see you once again avoided answering questions, and instead chose to  MarkCharles   Nov-26-11 08:12 AM   #62 
                       - I'm assume you're certain of that.  rug   Nov-26-11 08:59 AM   #63 
     - I think that's probably true. But I'm not sure.  Jim__   Nov-25-11 08:29 PM   #49 
        - I'm a little more optimistic.  rrneck   Nov-25-11 08:56 PM   #50 
           - To me the difference is that language doesn't break down at mach 2.  Jim__   Nov-26-11 09:00 AM   #64 
              - I think that  rrneck   Nov-26-11 11:28 AM   #68 
                 - The term "mach" is new. But it represents a known concept - a measure of speed.  Jim__   Nov-26-11 12:29 PM   #75 
                    - That makes sense.  rrneck   Nov-26-11 12:57 PM   #77 
                       - Sometimes I get the same feeling at the cosmological level.  Jim__   Nov-26-11 01:37 PM   #78 
  - If you know something, it's knowledge.  rrneck   Nov-25-11 07:38 PM   #40 
  - Can someone "know"  skepticscott   Nov-25-11 10:04 PM   #52 
     - It is of great value  rrneck   Nov-25-11 11:52 PM   #58 
     - Except that under your definition  skepticscott   Nov-26-11 07:43 AM   #60 
        - Well, there is that whole free will thing.  rrneck   Nov-26-11 11:19 AM   #67 
     - Picking up on one point here ...  Nihil   Nov-30-11 12:09 PM   #141 
  - You'll be happy to know  skepticscott   Nov-25-11 10:20 PM   #53 
  - I try to communicate clearly.  Boojatta   Nov-26-11 12:41 PM   #76 
  - I know that posts like this serve no purpose  Angry Dragon   Nov-26-11 11:44 PM   #93 
     - It has at the very least been entertaining  Silent3   Nov-27-11 01:18 AM   #94 
        - As long as you had fun  Angry Dragon   Nov-27-11 10:02 AM   #95 
        - I thought it was one of the best attempts to grapple with this subject I've seen in R/T.  trotsky   Nov-29-11 07:05 AM   #122 
           - Considering that the most engaged attempt...  Silent3   Nov-29-11 09:58 PM   #137 
              - Did you qualify your own self awareness yet?  rrneck   Nov-30-11 10:16 AM   #138 
                 - Ah, Magritte  Silent3   Nov-30-11 10:36 AM   #139 
                    - Ah Fillmore  rrneck   Nov-30-11 10:46 AM   #140 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC