darkstar3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-17-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 42. To ensure a truly "big tent", we can welcome religious progressives, |
|
but only by asking them to check their religion at the door.
Why?
Well, to start with, how about the concept of the infidel? The impetus of the Great Commission? The forsaking of all things that are not Godly?
The only way to be inclusive is to drop exclusivity at the door.
|
| -With the 99% ers |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-16-11 08:37 PM |
#0 |
 -
"There was no evidence that anybody was selling religion or stickling it in anyone’s face." |
trotsky |
Oct-16-11 08:42 PM |
#1 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 08:48 PM |
#3 |
| -
OK, you have GOT to stop abusing the language! |
darkstar3 |
Oct-16-11 08:54 PM |
#5 |
| -
Let's not, because this isn't the place. |
darkstar3 |
Oct-16-11 08:45 PM |
#2 |
| -
+1 n/t |
trotsky |
Oct-16-11 08:49 PM |
#4 |
| -
He can't help it |
NMMNG |
Oct-16-11 09:15 PM |
#7 |
| -
After all... |
laconicsax |
Oct-16-11 09:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
No, we wouldn't |
NMMNG |
Oct-16-11 09:38 PM |
#11 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 09:12 PM |
#6 |
| -
Be serious |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-16-11 10:29 PM |
#13 |
| -
Does it gall you that we can still post even though you try to ignore us? |
darkstar3 |
Oct-16-11 10:38 PM |
#14 |
| -
You admitted in the OP that there's nothing religious about the 99% movement. |
laconicsax |
Oct-16-11 11:05 PM |
#17 |
| -
Maybe for you |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-16-11 11:22 PM |
#19 |
| -
Quoting scripture doesn't make OWS a religious movement. |
laconicsax |
Oct-17-11 12:55 AM |
#21 |
| -
Nobody says that this is primarily a religious movement t. tg. |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-17-11 12:25 PM |
#25 |
| -
The involvement of religious people doesn't make OWS a religious movement. |
laconicsax |
Oct-17-11 02:38 PM |
#33 |
| -
Yeppers. |
okasha |
Oct-17-11 01:56 PM |
#31 |
| -
Except that isn't what I was saying. |
laconicsax |
Oct-17-11 02:34 PM |
#32 |
| -
Someone who claims to value "discussion" |
skepticscott |
Oct-17-11 05:34 PM |
#38 |
| -
In a few days. |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-16-11 10:46 PM |
#16 |
| -
Can you say that again in a way that makes sense? |
laconicsax |
Oct-16-11 11:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
Sure |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-17-11 12:30 PM |
#26 |
| -
Spare me the condescension. |
laconicsax |
Oct-17-11 02:47 PM |
#34 |
| -
All of your posts are pure, 100% hypocrisy. |
cleanhippie |
Oct-17-11 07:40 PM |
#51 |
| -
PEOPLE have a relationship |
rrneck |
Oct-17-11 10:22 AM |
#23 |
| -
Please provide documentation of this claim: |
trotsky |
Oct-17-11 01:13 PM |
#29 |
| -
The first thing you did when you got here... |
Iggo |
Oct-18-11 10:15 AM |
#72 |
| -
Alerted |
Goblinmonger |
Oct-16-11 09:23 PM |
#9 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 09:24 PM |
#10 |
| -
O dear! it's whoever for sure. |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-16-11 10:41 PM |
#15 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 10:14 PM |
#12 |
| -
Well |
rrneck |
Oct-16-11 11:24 PM |
#20 |
| -
your pictured list is far smaller than mine. |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-17-11 12:37 PM |
#27 |
| -
One would think |
rrneck |
Oct-17-11 12:57 PM |
#28 |
| -
I most certainly agree |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-17-11 01:38 PM |
#30 |
| -
Wow, that point went right over your head, huh? |
cleanhippie |
Oct-17-11 02:54 PM |
#36 |
| -
I disagree. |
rrneck |
Oct-17-11 03:31 PM |
#37 |
| -
That last sentence is really troubling , Why should liberals be |
Leontius |
Oct-17-11 06:07 PM |
#40 |
| -
To ensure a truly "big tent", we can welcome religious progressives, |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 06:15 PM |
#42 |
| -
So you can welcome religious progressives as long as they |
Leontius |
Oct-17-11 06:27 PM |
#44 |
| -
Well, either you didn't read the post in its entirety or you didn't care what I said. |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 06:30 PM |
#45 |
| -
No I read your entire post and I understand what you say, |
Leontius |
Oct-17-11 06:55 PM |
#46 |
| -
I said nothing of the sort. |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 07:02 PM |
#47 |
| -
Sorry for the miscommunication I use the two words |
Leontius |
Oct-17-11 07:25 PM |
#49 |
| -
Very interesting |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-17-11 11:13 PM |
#62 |
| -
Not secular activities. Governance. |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 11:20 PM |
#63 |
| -
No, but do you find it offensive when |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-17-11 11:33 PM |
#64 |
| -
Why do you even ask? |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 11:40 PM |
#65 |
| -
Yes |
rrneck |
Oct-18-11 01:39 AM |
#67 |
| -
You're misreading it |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-18-11 09:45 AM |
#70 |
| -
The only people at a political gathering |
rrneck |
Oct-18-11 10:42 AM |
#73 |
| -
Hey, if the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders or the cast of Glee or some Somalis from |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-18-11 11:36 AM |
#74 |
| -
If the priest really wanted to further |
rrneck |
Oct-18-11 01:08 PM |
#76 |
| -
And the first amendment means that priests have the right to offer Communion |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-18-11 01:29 PM |
#77 |
| -
Um |
rrneck |
Oct-18-11 02:06 PM |
#78 |
| -
If some a fundie megachurch decided that it was on the side of the 99%, |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-18-11 02:57 PM |
#80 |
| -
"...not there to preach..." |
rrneck |
Oct-18-11 04:00 PM |
#81 |
| -
You know, many times I have seen atheists on this board say that |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Oct-18-11 04:50 PM |
#82 |
| -
We don't need to bring people in. |
rrneck |
Oct-18-11 05:34 PM |
#83 |
| -
Good!. If that point ever gets heard on rt, |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-17-11 08:07 PM |
#56 |
| -
Please see post #59. nt |
rrneck |
Oct-17-11 09:45 PM |
#61 |
| -
Just so we're on the same page... |
rrneck |
Oct-17-11 09:20 PM |
#59 |
| -
Well said. |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 09:26 PM |
#60 |
| -
So well said that it's being ignored, of course. |
trotsky |
Oct-18-11 06:12 AM |
#68 |
| -
We are constantly told that religion is the superior way. |
trotsky |
Oct-17-11 05:50 PM |
#39 |
| -
unrec / alert n/t |
deacon_sephiroth |
Oct-17-11 06:04 AM |
#22 |
| -
So if I find a bible passage that I think relates to an issue, does that them make it |
cleanhippie |
Oct-17-11 10:40 AM |
#24 |
| -
Apparently so. n/t |
laconicsax |
Oct-17-11 02:48 PM |
#35 |
| -
Yes, egotistical followers of the Bible seem to want TOTAL CONTROL over |
David Sky |
Oct-17-11 06:11 PM |
#41 |
| -
Funny how they're always quick to distance themselves |
NMMNG |
Oct-17-11 06:21 PM |
#43 |
| -
Oh right!!!! I probably should have mentioned the clinic bombings instead of |
David Sky |
Oct-17-11 07:23 PM |
#48 |
| -
In the interest of "factual history" , 'Got mit uns' is not a nazi motto |
Leontius |
Oct-17-11 07:32 PM |
#50 |
| -
But it was on the buttons and buckles of Nazi uniforms... |
cleanhippie |
Oct-17-11 07:42 PM |
#52 |
| -
Study the origin of the motto and the evolution of German |
Leontius |
Oct-17-11 07:55 PM |
#53 |
| -
So you are saying that even though Nazis had that slogan on their uniforms, it wasn't a Nazi slogan? |
cleanhippie |
Oct-17-11 08:06 PM |
#55 |
| -
Nit pickers, all of them, still don't like how Christians were the slaugherers of |
David Sky |
Oct-18-11 07:17 AM |
#69 |
| -
i get arodund lot more than you do in Christian circles |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-17-11 08:03 PM |
#54 |
| -
No, you've already proven that you don't. Your experience has been remarkably insular, |
darkstar3 |
Oct-17-11 08:08 PM |
#57 |
| -
*yawn* |
cleanhippie |
Oct-17-11 11:43 PM |
#66 |
| -
Turn on your cable TV machine and find the religious channels there,... |
David Sky |
Oct-18-11 10:00 AM |
#71 |
| -
TV religion is a perversion for the sake of money. |
Thats my opinion |
Oct-18-11 12:06 PM |
#75 |
| -
Here's where you need to deal with some cognitive dissonance. |
trotsky |
Oct-18-11 02:17 PM |
#79 |
| -
If one views this national economic fiasco through a Christian lens... |
Deep13 |
Oct-17-11 09:15 PM |
#58 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread