You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: No, we wouldn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. No, we wouldn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -With the 99% ers Thats my opinion  Oct-16-11 08:37 PM   #0 
  - "There was no evidence that anybody was selling religion or stickling it in anyones face."  trotsky   Oct-16-11 08:42 PM   #1 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-16-11 08:48 PM   #3 
     - OK, you have GOT to stop abusing the language!  darkstar3   Oct-16-11 08:54 PM   #5 
  - Let's not, because this isn't the place.  darkstar3   Oct-16-11 08:45 PM   #2 
  - +1 n/t  trotsky   Oct-16-11 08:49 PM   #4 
  - He can't help it  NMMNG   Oct-16-11 09:15 PM   #7 
     - After all...  laconicsax   Oct-16-11 09:20 PM   #8 
        - No, we wouldn't  NMMNG   Oct-16-11 09:38 PM   #11 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-16-11 09:12 PM   #6 
  - Be serious  Thats my opinion   Oct-16-11 10:29 PM   #13 
  - Does it gall you that we can still post even though you try to ignore us?  darkstar3   Oct-16-11 10:38 PM   #14 
  - You admitted in the OP that there's nothing religious about the 99% movement.  laconicsax   Oct-16-11 11:05 PM   #17 
  - Maybe for you  Thats my opinion   Oct-16-11 11:22 PM   #19 
     - Quoting scripture doesn't make OWS a religious movement.  laconicsax   Oct-17-11 12:55 AM   #21 
        - Nobody says that this is primarily a religious movement t. tg.  Thats my opinion   Oct-17-11 12:25 PM   #25 
           - The involvement of religious people doesn't make OWS a religious movement.  laconicsax   Oct-17-11 02:38 PM   #33 
  - Yeppers.  okasha   Oct-17-11 01:56 PM   #31 
  - Except that isn't what I was saying.  laconicsax   Oct-17-11 02:34 PM   #32 
  - Someone who claims to value "discussion"  skepticscott   Oct-17-11 05:34 PM   #38 
  - In a few days.  Thats my opinion   Oct-16-11 10:46 PM   #16 
     - Can you say that again in a way that makes sense?  laconicsax   Oct-16-11 11:07 PM   #18 
     - Sure  Thats my opinion   Oct-17-11 12:30 PM   #26 
        - Spare me the condescension.  laconicsax   Oct-17-11 02:47 PM   #34 
        - All of your posts are pure, 100% hypocrisy.  cleanhippie   Oct-17-11 07:40 PM   #51 
     - PEOPLE have a relationship  rrneck   Oct-17-11 10:22 AM   #23 
     - Please provide documentation of this claim:  trotsky   Oct-17-11 01:13 PM   #29 
     - The first thing you did when you got here...  Iggo   Oct-18-11 10:15 AM   #72 
  - Alerted  Goblinmonger   Oct-16-11 09:23 PM   #9 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-16-11 09:24 PM   #10 
  - O dear! it's whoever for sure.  Thats my opinion   Oct-16-11 10:41 PM   #15 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-16-11 10:14 PM   #12 
  - Well  rrneck   Oct-16-11 11:24 PM   #20 
  - your pictured list is far smaller than mine.  Thats my opinion   Oct-17-11 12:37 PM   #27 
     - One would think  rrneck   Oct-17-11 12:57 PM   #28 
        - I most certainly agree  Thats my opinion   Oct-17-11 01:38 PM   #30 
           - Wow, that point went right over your head, huh?  cleanhippie   Oct-17-11 02:54 PM   #36 
           - I disagree.  rrneck   Oct-17-11 03:31 PM   #37 
           - That last sentence is really troubling , Why should liberals be  Leontius   Oct-17-11 06:07 PM   #40 
              - To ensure a truly "big tent", we can welcome religious progressives,  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 06:15 PM   #42 
              - So you can welcome religious progressives as long as they  Leontius   Oct-17-11 06:27 PM   #44 
                 - Well, either you didn't read the post in its entirety or you didn't care what I said.  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 06:30 PM   #45 
                 - No I read your entire post and I understand what you say,  Leontius   Oct-17-11 06:55 PM   #46 
                    - I said nothing of the sort.  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 07:02 PM   #47 
                       - Sorry for the miscommunication I use the two words  Leontius   Oct-17-11 07:25 PM   #49 
                 - Very interesting  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-17-11 11:13 PM   #62 
                    - Not secular activities. Governance.  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 11:20 PM   #63 
                       - No, but do you find it offensive when  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-17-11 11:33 PM   #64 
                          - Why do you even ask?  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 11:40 PM   #65 
                          - Yes  rrneck   Oct-18-11 01:39 AM   #67 
                             - You're misreading it  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-18-11 09:45 AM   #70 
                                - The only people at a political gathering  rrneck   Oct-18-11 10:42 AM   #73 
                                   - Hey, if the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders or the cast of Glee or some Somalis from  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-18-11 11:36 AM   #74 
                                      - If the priest really wanted to further  rrneck   Oct-18-11 01:08 PM   #76 
                                         - And the first amendment means that priests have the right to offer Communion  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-18-11 01:29 PM   #77 
                                            - Um  rrneck   Oct-18-11 02:06 PM   #78 
                                               - If some a fundie megachurch decided that it was on the side of the 99%,  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-18-11 02:57 PM   #80 
                                               - "...not there to preach..."  rrneck   Oct-18-11 04:00 PM   #81 
                                               - You know, many times I have seen atheists on this board say that  Lydia Leftcoast   Oct-18-11 04:50 PM   #82 
                                               - We don't need to bring people in.  rrneck   Oct-18-11 05:34 PM   #83 
              - Good!. If that point ever gets heard on rt,  Thats my opinion   Oct-17-11 08:07 PM   #56 
              - Please see post #59. nt  rrneck   Oct-17-11 09:45 PM   #61 
              - Just so we're on the same page...  rrneck   Oct-17-11 09:20 PM   #59 
                 - Well said.  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 09:26 PM   #60 
                    - So well said that it's being ignored, of course.  trotsky   Oct-18-11 06:12 AM   #68 
           - We are constantly told that religion is the superior way.  trotsky   Oct-17-11 05:50 PM   #39 
  - unrec / alert n/t  deacon_sephiroth   Oct-17-11 06:04 AM   #22 
  - So if I find a bible passage that I think relates to an issue, does that them make it  cleanhippie   Oct-17-11 10:40 AM   #24 
  - Apparently so. n/t  laconicsax   Oct-17-11 02:48 PM   #35 
  - Yes, egotistical followers of the Bible seem to want TOTAL CONTROL over  David Sky   Oct-17-11 06:11 PM   #41 
     - Funny how they're always quick to distance themselves  NMMNG   Oct-17-11 06:21 PM   #43 
     - Oh right!!!! I probably should have mentioned the clinic bombings instead of  David Sky   Oct-17-11 07:23 PM   #48 
        - In the interest of "factual history" , 'Got mit uns' is not a nazi motto  Leontius   Oct-17-11 07:32 PM   #50 
           - But it was on the buttons and buckles of Nazi uniforms...  cleanhippie   Oct-17-11 07:42 PM   #52 
              - Study the origin of the motto and the evolution of German  Leontius   Oct-17-11 07:55 PM   #53 
                 - So you are saying that even though Nazis had that slogan on their uniforms, it wasn't a Nazi slogan?  cleanhippie   Oct-17-11 08:06 PM   #55 
                    - Nit pickers, all of them, still don't like how Christians were the slaugherers of  David Sky   Oct-18-11 07:17 AM   #69 
     - i get arodund lot more than you do in Christian circles  Thats my opinion   Oct-17-11 08:03 PM   #54 
        - No, you've already proven that you don't. Your experience has been remarkably insular,  darkstar3   Oct-17-11 08:08 PM   #57 
        - *yawn*  cleanhippie   Oct-17-11 11:43 PM   #66 
        - Turn on your cable TV machine and find the religious channels there,...  David Sky   Oct-18-11 10:00 AM   #71 
           - TV religion is a perversion for the sake of money.  Thats my opinion   Oct-18-11 12:06 PM   #75 
              - Here's where you need to deal with some cognitive dissonance.  trotsky   Oct-18-11 02:17 PM   #79 
  - If one views this national economic fiasco through a Christian lens...  Deep13   Oct-17-11 09:15 PM   #58 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC