You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #124: Aren't both "ancient" and "Egypt" subjective? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #121
124. Aren't both "ancient" and "Egypt" subjective?
After all, sometimes a settled argument is referred to as "ancient history," so it seems that "ancient" can refer to 3000 years ago and 3 weeks ago. Thus, "ancient" is subjective.

Also, the modern borders of Egypt aren't the same as the historical borders, so it seems that "Egypt" is also subjective.

You wouldn't be trying to force an objective definition on a subjective term, now would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC