skepticscott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-01-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 15. What "topic" are you referring to, specifically? |
|
About what specific claim or idea are you asking me whether I might change my mind, given sufficient evidence?
|
| -My New Year's Resolution |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 10:02 AM |
#0 |
 -
Militant Atheist. n/t |
Goblinmonger |
Jan-01-11 10:10 AM |
#1 |
| -
"I will talk to you about this topic provided the following rules are obeyed." |
rug |
Jan-01-11 11:06 AM |
#2 |
| -
Are we allowed to discuss things |
edhopper |
Jan-01-11 11:55 AM |
#3 |
| -
Just off the top of my head |
wryter2000 |
Jan-01-11 12:01 PM |
#4 |
  -
I have no interest in converting you |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 01:18 PM |
#5 |
| -
Regard for "delicate feelings" |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 02:06 PM |
#9 |
| -
Read me. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 02:09 PM |
#10 |
| -
Ok, allow me to define myself further |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 02:23 PM |
#12 |
| -
Well, if you define "treat X badly" |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 02:41 PM |
#14 |
| -
OK, to define and give examples |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 05:34 PM |
#28 |
| -
You haven't given examples. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 05:50 PM |
#31 |
| -
Said threads |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 06:03 PM |
#33 |
| -
How convenient for you. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 06:21 PM |
#34 |
| -
So AGAIN |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 06:43 PM |
#37 |
| -
let me ask you this |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 05:38 PM |
#29 |
| -
Yes. Is it possible for people |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 06:36 PM |
#35 |
| -
My questions? |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 06:42 PM |
#36 |
| -
Please cite for me |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 06:45 PM |
#38 |
| -
Your quote |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 06:59 PM |
#42 |
| -
Your questions made me wonder |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 08:13 PM |
#48 |
| -
Your words, caps mine |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-01-11 09:50 PM |
#49 |
| -
You are either deliberately misrepresenting what SS said, |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 10:17 PM |
#50 |
| -
Your quote |
DonCoquixote |
Jan-02-11 06:24 PM |
#57 |
| -
You have a gift for misrepresentation. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-02-11 07:31 PM |
#58 |
| -
I this case, "delicate feelings" |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 02:35 PM |
#13 |
| -
Oh, they've already covered that |
WolverineDG |
Jan-01-11 05:46 PM |
#30 |
| -
If atheists treated people of faith in the same way they were treated... |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 05:57 PM |
#32 |
| -
Perhaps you should rethink your whole approach |
WolverineDG |
Jan-01-11 07:16 PM |
#44 |
| -
I think you just broke my projection meter. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 07:28 PM |
#45 |
| -
Funny thing I've noticed |
WolverineDG |
Jan-02-11 07:36 PM |
#59 |
| -
Another "tone argument". |
darkstar3 |
Jan-02-11 07:43 PM |
#60 |
| -
I would venture to guess that you have not seen |
Goblinmonger |
Jan-02-11 08:23 PM |
#61 |
| -
"Their own medicine"? |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 06:49 PM |
#39 |
| -
But, but, |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 06:50 PM |
#40 |
| -
Mao! |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 06:52 PM |
#41 |
| -
Dude, you were pwned by cbayer |
WolverineDG |
Jan-01-11 07:13 PM |
#43 |
| -
Oh he did? |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 07:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
Your response is why |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 08:09 PM |
#47 |
| -
Turned tail? Hardly. Please see my explanation for discontinuing the discussion below. |
cbayer |
Jan-02-11 01:12 PM |
#54 |
| -
I saw your explanation in #26 |
skepticscott |
Jan-02-11 03:43 PM |
#56 |
| -
Then, I suggest you go find the polluters |
wryter2000 |
Jan-01-11 02:23 PM |
#11 |
| -
If you read carefully |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 02:52 PM |
#16 |
| -
Spong's sample essay on "The Resurrection" is enough to show you incorrect. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 02:53 PM |
#17 |
| -
If everyone abided by this, it would shut down the forum. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 01:33 PM |
#6 |
| -
I don't disagree with you |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 01:40 PM |
#7 |
| -
Can YOU envision anything that would change your mind on this topic? |
cbayer |
Jan-01-11 02:00 PM |
#8 |
| -
What "topic" are you referring to, specifically? |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 02:45 PM |
#15 |
| -
Based on the title of this piece and your responses so far, I would suppose what you |
cbayer |
Jan-01-11 03:02 PM |
#18 |
| -
If you're asking me |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 03:10 PM |
#19 |
| -
I was just checking to see if you would hold yourself to the same standard set in the |
cbayer |
Jan-01-11 03:32 PM |
#20 |
| -
What a remarkable show of objectivity for someone with that icon next to their name. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 03:36 PM |
#21 |
| -
It is not clear to me whether you meant that sarcastically or not, but based on your |
cbayer |
Jan-01-11 03:58 PM |
#22 |
| -
If you say so. |
darkstar3 |
Jan-01-11 04:02 PM |
#23 |
| -
Since you seem to be calling me a liar |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 04:35 PM |
#24 |
| -
For the record, I am not calling you a liar. I am saying that, imo, you may not fulfill |
cbayer |
Jan-01-11 04:58 PM |
#25 |
| -
Well, let's see |
skepticscott |
Jan-01-11 05:23 PM |
#27 |
| -
As there have been objections raised to my participation in this thread due to my |
cbayer |
Jan-01-11 05:04 PM |
#26 |
| -
How is this a 'New Year's Resolution'? |
Bad Thoughts |
Jan-02-11 08:23 AM |
#51 |
| -
My statement means that |
skepticscott |
Jan-02-11 08:31 AM |
#52 |
| -
Ha. Good luck with that, See you in other forums, cuz rational discussions don't belong in RT. |
Evoman |
Jan-02-11 01:00 PM |
#53 |
| -
Who knows, you may be right |
skepticscott |
Jan-02-11 01:44 PM |
#55 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread