Reply #21: You keep repeating that this "evidence" is there...

[Silent3]

...and you keep on not presenting it. Hint: finding yet another way to re-word how there's evidence or proof won't count as presenting that evidence or proof either.

In any case, no one can say with absolute certainty that there was or was not an intelligent creator.

Which makes "I don't know" a better answer than giving up and saying "God did it" whenever you get to a point where you can't explain things further. Lack of "absolute certainty" is most certainly not a good defense for ID.

Absolute objective "proof" is only possible in science and mathematics.

Straw man. Who is asking for "absolute objective 'proof'" of anything in this thread? What does "absolute objective 'proof'" have to do with jumping in and defending the idiocy if ID?

I can't prove with 100% mathematical certainty that the Scientology tale of Xenu isn't true. Would you be happy if I grant ID that as much "credit" as I grant Xenu?

I'm losing track of everything you're still evading and side stepping at this point. You haven't dealt with the difference between cosmology and biology yet either.