You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: Why put quotes around something when it's not a quote? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Why put quotes around something when it's not a quote?
At least you were not quoting me, yet follow my post with quotation marks. Curious.
Do you understand how wrong that is?
Unbelievable? Quaint irony.

Do you think no one should claim Dawkins is an author? Oh, you mean no author should claim Dawkins -- literally taken. What would they claim him for anyway, it's not like he's dry cleaning...

Funny, how I can use a number (600) and use the word some, yet be accused of meaning all. Perhaps I was too close to the real number! Sorry. I just meant a made-up number, not what would be the real thing to you.

Do you really think there are 600 atheists. I would put the number higher than that, but you're entitled to your opinion.

I suppose, you putting words, like all, into other people's mouths, such as my own mouth, is okay to you, just not for deists in particular to do it to atheists. Have I got that right?

Either that or your funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Atheism is a non-belief, not a belief. MineralMan  Nov-18-09 09:13 AM   #0 
  - I believe you.  rug   Nov-18-09 09:15 AM   #1 
  - Thank you kindly.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 09:16 AM   #3 
  - I believe  ChairmanAgnostic   Nov-18-09 09:43 AM   #14 
     - I believe that you did rec the post.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 11:06 AM   #34 
  - It depends--it can be either the absence of belief or it can be  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 09:16 AM   #2 
  - Oh, I believe there is goods.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 09:17 AM   #4 
  - I'm obviously very confused, Though that would explain  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 09:37 AM   #11 
  - No, atheism is a belief like not collecting stamps is a hobby  Warpy   Nov-18-09 09:23 AM   #8 
  - and what of ascotchists?  ChairmanAgnostic   Nov-18-09 09:44 AM   #15 
     - Why would one drink Scotch, when  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 10:56 AM   #30 
  - No, you are wrong. It is NOT a belief in anything, its a LACK of belief.  rd_kent   Nov-18-09 12:32 PM   #40 
  - Agnosticism does not mean "no belief".  ZombieHorde   Nov-18-09 05:40 PM   #49 
  - Sounds like little to no semantic difference...  FBaggins   Nov-18-09 09:19 AM   #5 
  - There is a distinct semantic difference.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 09:21 AM   #7 
     - Depends on how you define "religion"  FBaggins   Nov-18-09 09:42 AM   #13 
  - It depends on your chosen nomenclature.  MercutioATC   Nov-18-09 09:21 AM   #6 
  - Mine is an active disbelief. I do not believe.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 09:24 AM   #9 
     - Again, it's semantics.  MercutioATC   Nov-18-09 09:41 AM   #12 
        - But don't you think that stating it as an "active disbelief"  Goblinmonger   Nov-18-09 10:32 AM   #25 
        - I'm not sure that I understand. I DO have an "active" disbelief in unicorns, by my definition.  MercutioATC   Nov-18-09 06:06 PM   #50 
        - A god?  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 10:59 AM   #31 
  - I always wonder why it is so hard for some...  Lost-in-FL   Nov-18-09 09:29 AM   #10 
  - They want to equalize the situation.  Silent3   Nov-18-09 10:15 AM   #20 
     - Abso-fraggin-lutely. Perfectly stated.  darkstar3   Nov-18-09 10:39 AM   #27 
     - Well said, sir or madam.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 11:07 AM   #35 
     - I don't know how you do it.  trotsky   Nov-18-09 12:15 PM   #39 
     - +1000000..Nicly done.  rd_kent   Nov-18-09 12:34 PM   #41 
  - Non-belief is a belief system - now if its an amorphous thought maybe not  stray cat   Nov-18-09 09:53 AM   #16 
  - You just contradicted yourself. You disproved your own thought.  rd_kent   Nov-18-09 12:34 PM   #42 
  - I believe in no gods.  Altoid_Cyclist   Nov-18-09 09:56 AM   #17 
  - But Grovelbot actually exists.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 11:02 AM   #32 
     - If we are able to find some more missiles, can we use biological warheads against FR?  Altoid_Cyclist   Nov-18-09 03:58 PM   #48 
  - It's sort of like the difference in math between positive and non-negative.  Silent3   Nov-18-09 10:06 AM   #18 
  - Thank you for this explanation - that makes sense.  Nihil   Nov-19-09 11:40 AM   #56 
  - I think the difference is rhetorical.  izzybeans   Nov-18-09 10:15 AM   #19 
  - No it isn't.  gcomeau   Nov-18-09 10:34 AM   #26 
  - I disagree.  rd_kent   Nov-18-09 12:36 PM   #43 
  - For my part as an Atheist I like the quote...  NeoGreen   Nov-18-09 10:18 AM   #21 
  - To me, sounds like a distinction without a difference.  HERVEPA   Nov-18-09 10:26 AM   #22 
  - How about: Null-State, Positive-State and Negative-State, Atheists?  NeoGreen   Nov-18-09 10:43 AM   #29 
     - Well,  HERVEPA   Nov-18-09 11:12 AM   #37 
        - check out response #28, five doors down...  NeoGreen   Nov-18-09 09:41 PM   #54 
  - Don't forget about PolyAtheism...  NeoGreen   Nov-18-09 10:29 AM   #23 
  - Oh, I believe in all of the gods.  kwassa   Nov-18-09 09:21 PM   #52 
     - You do not exist...  NeoGreen   Nov-18-09 09:39 PM   #53 
  - Two things to hold in one's head for this thread  Zodiak   Nov-18-09 10:31 AM   #24 
  - Colorless green ideas sleep furiously  yodermon   Nov-18-09 10:42 AM   #28 
  - ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##  DU GrovelBot   Nov-18-09 11:02 AM   #33 
  - See! Grovelbot exists.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 11:09 AM   #36 
  - Meh. Just avoid the issue by saying God doesn't exist and we can prove it.  jgraz   Nov-18-09 11:18 AM   #38 
  - depends, you are leaving out 1/2  paulsby   Nov-18-09 02:21 PM   #44 
  - Met any strong atheists?  darkstar3   Nov-18-09 02:43 PM   #46 
     - yes i have  paulsby   Nov-18-09 02:54 PM   #47 
        - .  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 02:38 PM   #61 
           - i'm well aware of the logical problems  paulsby   Nov-19-09 04:02 PM   #62 
              - Anecdotes = / = evidence,  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 04:09 PM   #63 
                 - are you kidding  paulsby   Nov-19-09 05:39 PM   #64 
                    - Not kidding at all.  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 08:12 PM   #65 
                       - ok  paulsby   Nov-19-09 10:03 PM   #70 
                          - You lose this round.  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 10:24 PM   #72 
                             - you still don't get it  paulsby   Nov-19-09 10:29 PM   #73 
                                - You are deliberately ignoring the points made to you,  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 10:34 PM   #75 
                                   - because it's an absurd point  paulsby   Nov-19-09 11:05 PM   #77 
                                      - OK, this is my last attempt to stop your conflation of two separate points.  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 11:14 PM   #79 
  - Well said.  rrneck   Nov-18-09 02:23 PM   #45 
  - Heck, I'd settle for just one.  MineralMan   Nov-18-09 06:48 PM   #51 
  - Yep, people making assumption based on a limited world view is pretty annoying. n/t  Meshuga   Nov-19-09 06:41 AM   #55 
  - Ah, what a delightful way to waste some time.  Festivito   Nov-19-09 11:52 AM   #57 
     - "followers of atheism"  TZ   Nov-19-09 12:50 PM   #58 
     - Why put quotes around something when it's not a quote?  Festivito   Nov-19-09 01:33 PM   #59 
        - For the record:  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 02:26 PM   #60 
           - Boy, you guys are dense.  Festivito   Nov-19-09 08:43 PM   #66 
              - Abusing the English language  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 08:51 PM   #67 
                 - It's like round-robin idiocy.  Festivito   Nov-19-09 09:35 PM   #68 
                    - Contradiction is all you have,  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 09:43 PM   #69 
                       - Perhaps you just don't like people who disagree with you.  Festivito   Nov-19-09 10:19 PM   #71 
                          - You've come to expect no less, have you?  darkstar3   Nov-19-09 10:30 PM   #74 
                             - It was followers of that meaning, that particular meaning.  Festivito   Nov-19-09 10:49 PM   #76 
                             - indeed I put in in quotations because that was what that mess of text was saying  TZ   Nov-20-09 08:36 AM   #81 
     - Sorry, etymologically, a-theist means not having a belief in a god.  iris27   Nov-19-09 11:10 PM   #78 
     - English is a clunky language. And, no, you're not sorry.  Festivito   Nov-20-09 05:20 AM   #80 
        - On second thought...  MineralMan   Nov-20-09 02:35 PM   #83 
     - Followers? How would I have any followers?  MineralMan   Nov-20-09 08:45 AM   #82 
        - Hopefully, people can follow what you say.  Festivito   Nov-21-09 09:42 AM   #84 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC