Reply #90: ROFLMAO

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

Nice try kid.

I can articulate it just fine. I wasn't going to waste my time explaining something that even any reasonably intelligent person would be able to recognize off the top of their heads. But hell, it's been a few hours, so fuck it.

See, the reason why your analogy is so absurd in comparison is because there is a complete lack of circumstantial evidence to theorize that a bed can or has turned into such a thing. You have nothing to go by in that claim other than creativity out of thin air. But as it relates to god, a list can be made with a million pieces of supporting evidence to theorize the potential for his existence. You choose to believe that the things on that list are from causes other than god, but it is a belief nonetheless. There's no proof either way. But there's a TON of things that can be used in supporting argument that god may exist, but you'd have NO logical or reasonable supporting evidence to make a claim that a bed can or has turned into a spinal cord devouring water buffalo. Knowing that the universe was created somehow and in some way, while also being aware of the plethora of wonders within it, causes a theory that some higher power had a hand in it to not be an absurdity, but instead a possibility. Because we don't know the source of universe creation, and the concept that matter just simply appeared from nothing or the even more absurd notion that matter was always there are huge leaps of faith as well, the theory of god is perfectly reasonable and there's nothing wrong with someone choosing to believe that route. There's also nothing wrong with someone choosing to believe the universe just poofed out of nothing, or simply always existed. Each possibility seems impossible, improbably or incredible based on what we actually KNOW, but yet one of them has to be right. We don't know which one. I could just as easily compare the non-god universe creation theory as equivalent to a bed turning into a spine devouring water buffalo, but I wouldn't. Why? Cause it's an idiotic comparison.

So yeah, I articulated it just fine and basically have just logically blown you to oblivion. Feel free to get the last word, because I'm content in what I've already stated and content in the reality that the overwhelming majority of objective and intelligent readers would agree that I've owned you.