elshiva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-01-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| -If you believe in an afterlife, why do you believe in it? nt |
raccoon |
Dec-01-08 10:59 AM |
#0 |
-
I don't so much believe in an afterlife |
riqster |
Dec-01-08 11:06 AM |
#1 |
 -
What makes you think all the happenings of the universe are cyclical? |
HereSince1628 |
Dec-01-08 11:13 AM |
#4 |
  -
Good point - it's still just a theory |
riqster |
Dec-01-08 11:28 AM |
#8 |
 -
It actually seems like the theorists think aspects of it are not cyclical |
HereSince1628 |
Dec-01-08 01:02 PM |
#13 |
 -
Wouldn't be the first time I was out of date |
riqster |
Dec-01-08 01:15 PM |
#15 |
 -
Even in nature the things that come back... |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-01-08 12:24 PM |
#10 |
-
Better phrasing than mine |
riqster |
Dec-01-08 12:36 PM |
#11 |
-
You go first, unless you're just trolling. n/t |
crikkett |
Dec-01-08 11:09 AM |
#2 |
 -
I don't believe in an afterlife. There was a time in my life when I did, because I |
raccoon |
Dec-01-08 11:15 AM |
#5 |
-
I think our energy comes back in another life form. Hopefully |
rainy |
Dec-01-08 11:10 AM |
#3 |
 -
I like that idea but I don't want to come back as a puddle of oil. |
floridablue |
Dec-01-08 11:22 AM |
#7 |
  -
Poo is more useful than oil overall |
riqster |
Dec-01-08 11:31 AM |
#9 |
 -
If you understand thermodynamics... |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-01-08 12:41 PM |
#12 |
  -
The afterlife doesn't necesarily mean that the consiousness remains in tact. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 11:10 PM |
#79 |
 -
Energy, at least energy in the sense that thermodynamics considers |
HereSince1628 |
Dec-01-08 01:09 PM |
#14 |
-
I don't. I also don't disbelieve. There's no solid demonstrative fact either way. |
YOY |
Dec-01-08 11:19 AM |
#6 |
 -
There's no solid demonstrative fact either way. |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-01-08 11:35 PM |
#19 |
-
I believe in "one n done", then someone |
floridablue |
Dec-01-08 02:49 PM |
#16 |
 -
Agreed. |
elshiva |
Dec-01-08 08:32 PM |
#17 |
-
Because I like to think that eternal suffering is a reasonable sentence for thoughtcrime comitted |
laconicsax |
Dec-01-08 10:51 PM |
#18 |
-
I believe in an afterlife. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:25 AM |
#20 |
 -
Why do you believe this? |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 09:07 AM |
#22 |
-
Yes, my belief is based on physical observation and metaphysical constructs. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 10:34 AM |
#23 |
-
Amusing |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 02:01 PM |
#24 |
-
Actually fourth dimensional vectors are perfectly scientifically valid. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 05:52 PM |
#25 |
-
How deftly you side step! |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 06:16 PM |
#26 |
-
Look, if it's a flame war you're looking for you've got the wrong guy. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 06:26 PM |
#27 |
-
Like I said: |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 06:35 PM |
#28 |
-
If you actually took a second to respond to my idea intelligently |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 06:39 PM |
#29 |
-
You have very clever insults for a Buddhist. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 06:46 PM |
#30 |
 -
Are you being purposefully dense out of amusement? |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:01 PM |
#31 |
  -
You have called it |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 07:16 PM |
#35 |
 -
Very good! You're getting it. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:23 PM |
#38 |
 -
I guess the show is over. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 07:28 PM |
#40 |
 -
Scientific analysis is used in philosophical arguments. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:00 PM |
#43 |
 -
I'm just observing here. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:13 PM |
#46 |
 -
I apreciate your observations. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:33 PM |
#50 |
 -
You're welcome. n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:39 PM |
#53 |
 -
I think you meant to say, "Thank you", |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:45 PM |
#54 |
 -
I always say "You're Welcome" |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:50 PM |
#57 |
 -
Oh, sorry. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 09:29 PM |
#61 |
 -
Since you are not familiar with this forum, |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 09:38 PM |
#62 |
 -
I believe I've made a solid case for my beliefs. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 09:46 PM |
#64 |
 -
You are welcome to believe anything you want to believe. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 09:57 PM |
#66 |
 -
Again with the single sentence quips. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 10:25 PM |
#70 |
 -
Oooooh it's back to the bitterness again. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 10:31 PM |
#72 |
 -
Ahh, I see. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 10:55 PM |
#75 |
 -
ENCORE! ENCORE! n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 11:01 PM |
#77 |
 -
Oh, and are Buddhists not supposed to be able to make clever remarks? |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:04 PM |
#32 |
-
You're just more amusing than most buddhists. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 07:09 PM |
#33 |
-
I feel sadness for you. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:13 PM |
#34 |
-
Oooooh now it is just bitterness. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 07:17 PM |
#36 |
-
I expected about that much. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:26 PM |
#39 |
-
You don't make the rules here. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 07:32 PM |
#41 |
-
If you get your head out of the sandbox for a second |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:02 PM |
#44 |
-
Your demands are no more potent than your insults. n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:14 PM |
#47 |
-
And I've "demanded" what, exactly? n/t |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:34 PM |
#51 |
-
"Nothing I've posted flies in the face of science" |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-02-08 07:23 PM |
#37 |
-
You haven't read my other posts here. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 07:50 PM |
#42 |
-
Now that's the part that's amusing. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:06 PM |
#45 |
-
You've never taken a single philosophy course, have you? |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:25 PM |
#48 |
-
It's not about me. It never was. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:32 PM |
#49 |
 -
You density is a pose, of course. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 08:38 PM |
#52 |
-
When you post an idiotic statement |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 08:46 PM |
#55 |
-
You keep sidestepping the obvious point here. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 09:09 PM |
#58 |
-
No, YOU are discussing pseudo science |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 09:17 PM |
#59 |
-
What you call pseudoscience has long been considered "metaphysics". |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 09:41 PM |
#63 |
-
You say potato, I say bullshit. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 09:49 PM |
#65 |
-
You really can't respond with more than a single sentence at a time, can you? |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 10:13 PM |
#67 |
-
You're talking to yourself |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 10:23 PM |
#69 |
-
What exactly do you want me to continue? |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 10:27 PM |
#71 |
-
Making a fool of yourself. n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 10:31 PM |
#73 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-08 10:58 PM |
#76 |
-
After all your ad hominem attacks you accuse ME of attacking you? |
cosmik debris |
Dec-02-08 11:03 PM |
#78 |
-
You can't just pull presuppositions out of your ass, however. |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-02-08 08:49 PM |
#56 |
-
My conjecture was sound and provided adequate basis for my opinion. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 09:24 PM |
#60 |
-
You're basically saying if you presume what you want to presume... |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-02-08 10:14 PM |
#68 |
-
Not quite. |
peruban |
Dec-02-08 10:50 PM |
#74 |
-
If we're going to play the credentials game... |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-02-08 11:21 PM |
#80 |
-
You make very good points. |
peruban |
Dec-03-08 12:08 AM |
#81 |
-
I'm not expecting a thesis paper |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-03-08 10:41 AM |
#82 |
-
So, then |
peruban |
Dec-03-08 11:21 AM |
#83 |
-
Oh, I'm used to it. |
Kerry4Kerry |
Dec-03-08 03:49 PM |
#85 |
-
On the afterlife, and the soul. |
realpolitik |
Dec-02-08 08:48 AM |
#21 |
-
Afterlife and Nirvana were explained to me in 5 words |
Azooz |
Dec-03-08 02:50 PM |
#84 |
-
It gives me hope that there might actually be justice some time... |
SidneyCarton |
Dec-03-08 06:49 PM |
#86 |