You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #94: That's a completely impractical way of looking at it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. That's a completely impractical way of looking at it
That's why we have the scientific method, to test such things. There is no factual evidence to support any of those claims, so until proven otherwise, there is no *logical* or *rational* reason to believe in them.

You can argue (again) that logic and reason don't apply in this case, and that leads us back to square one.

Yes, there might be an invisible unicorn flying above your head, but there is no logical reason to believe there is, even if you believe you feel its presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC