deliberately, I must assume, because you know there's no discrepancy for the reasons I've already given.
If someone claims to have seen something which I haven't seen, that has a different evidential status for me from something seen by me.
It's just not a 'discrepancy'! :D
Now go away and argue your way out of another paper bag if you can. But first you have to get out of the one you're currently stuck inside ---the one you've wrapped around yourself.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(984 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
