You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

"Spare the rod, spoil the child"...maybe not what you think it means [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 04:34 PM
Original message
"Spare the rod, spoil the child"...maybe not what you think it means
Advertisements [?]
This LTTE appeared in my local paper. The next time you hear a "Christian" advocating beating children, tell them this...

Bible says guide kids, not beat them
In an article on the debate about spanking, which appeared March 8, a school administrator from a private Christian school is quoted as saying, in regard to corporal punishment, "The Bible teaches it." The article does not provide any Scripture that he may have offered to back up this claim, and I am wondering if he is thinking of the oft-quoted "Spare the rod and spoil the child" taken from Proverbs.

In what context is the term "rod" used in this, and other, Proverbial quote(s)? Is it the same "rod" that is found in the Bible's 23rd Psalm: "Thy rod and staff, they comfort me"? How can it be that the same item - a "rod" - is mentioned as both a tool for punishing (striking) a child and then also gently spoken of as a reassuring source of comfort?

To understand this, consider what type of "rod" is being discussed in the first place, which is a shepherd's rod/staff that is used when guiding and caring for sheep. Throughout the Bible, the comparison is made that the relationship between God (and Jesus) and his followers is similar to that of a shepherd caring for his sheep.

Since this text originated during a time, and place, when the people were very familiar with the care of sheep, it is an analogy that provided an understandable frame of reference. A shepherd carried with him a tall wooden rod/staff that was curved at the top.

How was this used in regard to the sheep? When a sheep would leave the flock and stray, did the shepherd use the rod to beat the sheep back into place? Hardly. In fact, the curved end of the shepherd's rod is used to go around the errant sheep and guide it back into place, or even to grasp the sheep and pull it up from where it may have fallen while straying.

A shepherd's rod is used to open gates and brush off, fend off attackers of the sheep, and to guide and steer the sheep along the right path. It is not a tool of pain used to beat the sheep as punishment or something the sheep fear.

If you consider this - the actual use of a shepherd's rod/staff - it is easy to understand that when it comes to children, the Bible teaches guidance and bringing children back to the right path through vigilance and care, in the same manner a shepherd continually guides his sheep along the right path, as opposed to the justification of striking children as form of punishment and to keep their behavior in line.

H. Lyjak

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -"Spare the rod, spoil the child"...maybe not what you think it means xray s  Mar-18-05 04:34 PM   #0 
  - thanks  rodeodance   Mar-18-05 04:42 PM   #1 
  - Wow! Someone agrees  Bellamia   Mar-18-05 04:44 PM   #2 
  - Wow! Never knew the historical uses of a shepard's rod. It makes much  Verve   Mar-18-05 04:44 PM   #3 
  - The tool in question is called a cruikshank.  Zerex71   Mar-18-05 04:45 PM   #4 
  - very true - and something that needs resaying :-)  papau   Mar-18-05 04:45 PM   #5 
  - Actually the Bible says  wtmusic   Mar-18-05 04:48 PM   #6 
  - Thanks wtmusic. So the bible is saying if you don't guide your children  Verve   Mar-18-05 04:55 PM   #8 
  - I like this. I'm going to remember it.  cornermouse   Mar-18-05 04:49 PM   #7 
  - i have explained this to many parents  knowbody0   Mar-18-05 04:55 PM   #9 
  - Yes  Tux   Mar-19-05 12:31 PM   #11 
  - I like your reading, but ...  Jim__   Mar-19-05 09:17 AM   #10 
  - Yeah, it pretty much has to be.  igil   Mar-19-05 01:34 PM   #13 
  - thanks  Dookus   Mar-19-05 02:51 PM   #14 
     - It depends on the quote  Pigwidgeon   Mar-20-05 11:33 AM   #16 
  - The modern equivalent would be a dog's collar and leash  StopThePendulum   Mar-19-05 01:30 PM   #12 
  - Why should this argument be necessary?  _TJ_   Mar-20-05 11:19 AM   #15 
  - Well, that's great, but lets not forget these Biblical Gems...  progressoid   Mar-20-05 12:02 PM   #17 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC