You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Maybe you could start with producing the example you were asked [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Maybe you could start with producing the example you were asked
to produce. It would be very helpful to see what you are talking about. Otherwise I'll have to assume paranoia or flame bait on your part.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why do some DUers think being Christian means you need to be a whiney little baby? Goblinmonger  Apr-10-07 07:36 AM   #0 
  - For those of us who don't necessarily make the intuitive leap,  EST   Apr-10-07 07:42 AM   #1 
  - Sorry  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 07:49 AM   #4 
  - That sounds more like a description of you secular fundies.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 07:42 AM   #2 
  - Bill O'Reilly?  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 07:48 AM   #3 
  - That's a good one! "Secular progressive!" I like it. As a matter of fact,  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 07:59 AM   #7 
     - Please explain  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 08:02 AM   #8 
     - He's probably no more scared than he was by using the phrase "you people"  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-10-07 09:06 AM   #20 
     - Still waiting for your explanation  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 09:18 AM   #24 
        - Bill O. has him on hold  cosmik debris   Apr-10-07 09:34 AM   #27 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-07 02:26 PM   #29 
              - So you can't explain it yourself?  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 02:32 PM   #30 
              - No. Not to you, or instead of there being just the one eejit, there'd be  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 02:57 PM   #32 
                 - It is pretty damn simple if  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:02 PM   #33 
                 - If you'd lived long enough to see the depth to which our society has sunk in its  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:13 PM   #40 
                    - *spills coffee on to monitor*  Evoman   Apr-10-07 03:17 PM   #44 
                    - Oh, I agree  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:17 PM   #45 
                    - Hey, remember when women couldn't vote, and the black people did our  Evoman   Apr-10-07 03:25 PM   #55 
                    - And remember, it was mostly the non-conformist churches who led the  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:37 PM   #60 
                       - Yeah, I pretty much hate christianity.  Evoman   Apr-10-07 04:17 PM   #69 
                    - That was largely the work of atheist politicians masquerading as Christians.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:31 PM   #57 
                       - Isn't that special.  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:32 PM   #58 
                       - By their fruit you shall know them. Compelling circumstantial evidence, of course.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:40 PM   #61 
                          - So because they don't fit your definition of Christian  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:42 PM   #62 
                          - Aaah, you nearly fergetted.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:46 PM   #64 
                          - You have no idea just how deluded. He's an ID Pusher.  beam me up scottie   Apr-10-07 10:10 PM   #87 
                          - Hmmm, now I will attempt to show your reasoning circular:  Random_Australian   Apr-10-07 08:32 PM   #86 
                       - LOL!  Evoman   Apr-10-07 04:19 PM   #70 
                    - HOLY SHIT! I'm glad I wasn't drinking when I read that.  Rabrrrrrr   Apr-10-07 08:05 PM   #82 
                 - "... the anomie and havoc your faithlessness gives rise to in our Western societies..."  Zenlitened   Apr-10-07 03:34 PM   #59 
                 - I'm. Gonna. Die.  Random_Australian   Apr-10-07 08:19 PM   #83 
                    - anomie and havoc  cosmik debris   Apr-10-07 08:24 PM   #84 
              - OK, it's my prep and I need a break  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 02:50 PM   #31 
                 - All that trouble, in the hope that I'd be gagging to apprise myself of your thoughts.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:03 PM   #34 
                    - So let me get this straight.  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:10 PM   #35 
                       - I offer it in the UK. Apparantly he isn't ineterested in asking.  cyborg_jim   Apr-10-07 03:13 PM   #38 
                          - But you are just  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:13 PM   #39 
                             - I bet he's gone to Oxford Street at least once.  cyborg_jim   Apr-10-07 03:16 PM   #42 
  - "secular fundie" makes no sense at all  unpossibles   Apr-10-07 08:39 AM   #14 
  - That makes sense  cosmik debris   Apr-10-07 08:45 AM   #16 
     - exactly.  unpossibles   Apr-10-07 08:50 AM   #17 
        - I lived in the deep south 50 years ago  cosmik debris   Apr-10-07 08:52 AM   #18 
        - PZ Myers has suggested adopted that expression  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-10-07 09:14 AM   #23 
           - thanks for the link!  unpossibles   Apr-10-07 09:25 AM   #25 
  - Totally expected from you, KCDM the 3rd.  trotsky   Apr-10-07 09:32 AM   #26 
  - Haven't you heard?  varkam   Apr-11-07 08:35 PM   #107 
  - considering that you theophiles  zonmoy   Apr-10-07 04:08 PM   #68 
  - LOL you have a point  MistressOverdone   Apr-10-07 07:55 AM   #5 
  - This atheist says ....  Trajan   Apr-10-07 07:56 AM   #6 
  - See #4 above n/t  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 08:03 AM   #9 
  - Are these types of thread headings meant to show how unsure and insecure the OP is or how unsure in  papau   Apr-10-07 08:10 AM   #10 
  - Come on, papau  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 08:15 AM   #11 
  - maybe because for well over 6 years we have had to deal with  flyarm   Apr-10-07 08:22 AM   #12 
  - Why is opposing bigotry considered "whining" by a very small subset of DUers?  MethuenProgressive   Apr-10-07 08:29 AM   #13 
  - It's not  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 08:45 AM   #15 
  - I'll continue to confront bigotry, even if it's called it "whining" by one or two DUers.  MethuenProgressive   Apr-10-07 08:55 AM   #19 
     - Maybe you could start with producing the example you were asked  WakingLife   Apr-10-07 09:07 AM   #21 
     - I wasn't calling it whining.  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 09:07 AM   #22 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-07 03:10 PM   # 
           - Dude, can you please stop with the ad hominems. It is not necessary.  Evoman   Apr-10-07 03:11 PM   #37 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-07 03:15 PM   #41 
              - I think you need to take a deep breath and calm down.  Evoman   Apr-10-07 03:19 PM   #47 
              - Well, I nearly gotcha!  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:23 PM   #52 
              - You had to toss in an ad hom  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:19 PM   #48 
              - Ah yes, if all else fails accuse your opposition of being 'too young to understand'  cyborg_jim   Apr-10-07 03:20 PM   #49 
                 - I don't think there are many people more Right than this guy.  Evoman   Apr-10-07 03:27 PM   #56 
           - Ooooh, your ad homs are getting a little better.  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:16 PM   #43 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-07 03:19 PM   #46 
                 - Argument  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:21 PM   #50 
                    - Wa..a...a..a..y... too difficult.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:22 PM   #51 
                       - OK, it's obviously over  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:23 PM   #53 
                          - Excellent. It's what I'd hoped. I don't want to see you degraded beyond recognition.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:45 PM   #63 
                             - Data, Claim, Warrant  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:48 PM   #65 
                                - The biter, bit! Great wailing and gnashing of teeth over here. An "ad hominem", no less.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 03:51 PM   #66 
                                   - Data. Claim. Warrant  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 04:30 PM   #71 
                                      - A lesson I learned after arguing with a taxi driver the other day:  varkam   Apr-10-07 04:54 PM   #72 
                                      - Now, you're slipping again. You started off OK, then fergetted and  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Apr-10-07 05:22 PM   #73 
                                      - Dammit, I'm gettin pissed here.  cosmik debris   Apr-10-07 06:06 PM   #78 
  - I'm still waiting for you, buddy.  Goblinmonger   Apr-12-07 03:21 PM   #114 
  - I would like to add a thought to this thread, if I may...  EST   Apr-10-07 01:04 PM   #28 
  - That's cool, but the thread was about some of the barriers to really accepting  Random_Australian   Apr-10-07 08:24 PM   #85 
  - Psstttt....with most crowds, satire is obviously not the way to go.  Evoman   Apr-10-07 03:10 PM   #36 
  - But I'm just in one of those moods today.  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 03:24 PM   #54 
  - Emotionally stunted. Probably had neglectful parents (or think they did, more likely).  Rabrrrrrr   Apr-10-07 04:00 PM   #67 
  - The Thread this one whines about was deleted: Proving the DU bias.  MethuenProgressive   Apr-10-07 05:40 PM   #74 
  - I thought we we starting to get somewhere on the other thread  cyborg_jim   Apr-10-07 05:44 PM   #75 
  - I thought so too, cyborg. It is interesting what is and isn't allowed.  MethuenProgressive   Apr-10-07 05:48 PM   #76 
     - I think you have noble ideals but you're fighting the wrong fight  cyborg_jim   Apr-10-07 06:10 PM   #79 
  - I'm just wondering  Goblinmonger   Apr-10-07 06:05 PM   #77 
     - I don't read every post. - which ones up there concern you?  MethuenProgressive   Apr-10-07 06:13 PM   #80 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-07 11:03 PM   #89 
        - I'm a "dipshit" because I haven't read every post in the R/T forum?  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 05:50 AM   #90 
           - See what I mean about seeing what you want to see?  cyborg_jim   Apr-11-07 05:53 AM   #91 
              - Oh, I see. That way they avoid violating DU rules. How clever!  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 06:01 AM   #93 
     - Good question.  Evoman   Apr-10-07 06:14 PM   #81 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-07 10:13 PM   #88 
        - Call the Waaaaaaaaaaaaambulance! I sent you one single PM,  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 06:00 AM   #92 
           - No, that's for whiney crybabies who can't back up their accusations in this forum.  beam me up scottie   Apr-11-07 06:05 AM   #94 
           - That's right, stick it to Bmus! Let's see her post things like this in Political Videos!  Random_Australian   Apr-11-07 06:11 AM   #95 
              - Calling people names instead of continuing to debate in an open forum is cowardly.  beam me up scottie   Apr-11-07 07:34 AM   #96 
              - Just thinking about that before meant I went back and found this post:  Random_Australian   Apr-11-07 08:10 AM   #97 
                 - I'm visiting that post you linked to - good stuff  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 04:59 PM   #99 
              - Random_Australian, "it's not just about one poster or one thread,"  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 04:52 PM   #98 
                 - People keep asking you to back up your ridiculous accusations of "violently obscene hate speech"  GreenJ   Apr-11-07 05:40 PM   #101 
                 - I've already done that, and you had my threads and posts deleted.  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 06:56 PM   #102 
                    - Why don't you do your own research?  Heaven and Earth   Apr-11-07 06:58 PM   #103 
                    - Gee, what a surprise you have nothing to back up your ridiculous accusations.  GreenJ   Apr-11-07 07:23 PM   #104 
                 - That's odd, because the answer I keep on seeing is things like  Random_Australian   Apr-11-07 07:54 PM   #105 
                    - "the one time Christianity was directly attacked"?  MethuenProgressive   Apr-11-07 08:31 PM   #106 
                       - Ah, note the subtleties of what I'm saying.  Random_Australian   Apr-11-07 09:01 PM   #108 
                       - I'm no wordsmith, I admit.  MethuenProgressive   Apr-12-07 06:54 AM   #111 
                       - Gee, if I wanted the mods to stop deleting my posts, I'd stop inferring they're owned by atheists..  beam me up scottie   Apr-12-07 01:33 AM   #110 
                          - "FYI, almost ALL of us have had posts deleted, sparky."  MethuenProgressive   Apr-12-07 06:58 AM   #112 
                             - You've had entire threads deleted, slick, you're way ahead of me.  beam me up scottie   Apr-12-07 12:08 PM   #113 
  - Really  Swede   Apr-11-07 05:12 PM   #100 
     - Yup n/t  Goblinmonger   Apr-11-07 10:47 PM   #109 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC