kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-20-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 55. Why do you want to "shove your grid on them?" |
|
In other words, what makes it OK for your grid to be forced on them but not for theirs to be forced on you?
|
| -Here Follows Some Psycho-Metaphysics: |
kiahzero |
Mar-19-07 02:21 PM |
#0 |
-
Interesting |
yella_dawg |
Mar-19-07 02:41 PM |
#1 |
 -
Eh. |
kiahzero |
Mar-19-07 02:46 PM |
#2 |
-
H.L. Mencken had it pegged a long time ago. |
trotsky |
Mar-19-07 02:50 PM |
#3 |
 -
Really? |
kiahzero |
Mar-19-07 03:04 PM |
#4 |
-
Ah yes, the typical response. |
trotsky |
Mar-19-07 04:05 PM |
#5 |
 -
It's not an issue of "not understanding." |
kiahzero |
Mar-19-07 04:20 PM |
#6 |
-
I'm sorry but that passage IS "just big words meaning nothing." |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 07:42 AM |
#15 |
-
Brevity is the soul of wit |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 08:11 AM |
#19 |
 -
I can't help but be verbose. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 08:36 AM |
#22 |
-
I guess that explains why |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 09:45 AM |
#34 |
-
You know, this is a good example of why pathological readings are bad. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 08:35 AM |
#21 |
-
Oh I fully understand the refined and noble approach you're trying to use here. |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 08:44 AM |
#23 |
-
Interestingly, I just wrote on this topic the other day |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 08:56 AM |
#24 |
-
So? |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 09:00 AM |
#25 |
 -
How are they being forced? |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 09:09 AM |
#27 |
-
Let's use a specific example: abortion. |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 09:36 AM |
#31 |
-
Thanks. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 09:44 AM |
#33 |
-
"A minimally restrictive grid" |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 10:00 AM |
#39 |
-
Yes, you have to force a grid on people for society to function. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:04 AM |
#41 |
-
Yes, but whose grid? |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 10:33 AM |
#48 |
-
Oooga booga booga! |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:44 AM |
#49 |
-
I think you're still missing the point. |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 10:50 AM |
#50 |
-
I'm actually looking at "minimally restrictive" at a societal level. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:57 AM |
#51 |
-
Again, what if "society" includes the unborn? |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 11:02 AM |
#54 |
-
Why do you want to "shove your grid on them?" |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 11:05 AM |
#55 |
-
Because I'm right and they're wrong, of course. |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 11:06 AM |
#56 |
-
On what basis are you right and they're wrong? |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 11:08 AM |
#57 |
-
Majority rule! Reasoned approach! Doesn't really matter. |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 11:30 AM |
#58 |
-
I already have. (n/t) |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 11:59 AM |
#59 |
-
How about Christian Scientists sacrificing sick children to the principle |
BurtWorm |
Mar-20-07 09:05 AM |
#26 |
-
"Valid" isn't really the operative word. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 09:25 AM |
#29 |
-
"There are now statutes in 44 states which contain a provision stating that a child |
BurtWorm |
Mar-20-07 09:50 AM |
#36 |
-
Yes, conflicting views inevitably collide. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 09:52 AM |
#37 |
-
And what does a society do to resolve them? |
BurtWorm |
Mar-20-07 10:09 AM |
#42 |
-
I agree that inaction is action. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:14 AM |
#44 |
-
But it's all good. Isn't it? |
BurtWorm |
Mar-20-07 10:19 AM |
#46 |
-
No, it's not all good. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:22 AM |
#47 |
-
"Reality is the original Rorschach." |
BurtWorm |
Mar-20-07 10:59 AM |
#52 |
-
I assume you're differing there, but I'm not sure how. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 11:01 AM |
#53 |
-
Must. resist. urge. to. go. on. anti-PoMo rant.... |
Odin2005 |
Mar-19-07 08:25 PM |
#8 |
-
No, please do. And when you do, make sure you include |
Evoman |
Mar-19-07 10:49 PM |
#9 |
-
What a load of profound-sounding BS. |
Odin2005 |
Mar-19-07 08:23 PM |
#7 |
 -
Do you think that we can know objective reality? |
kiahzero |
Mar-19-07 10:57 PM |
#10 |
-
No, but we can get a reasonable aproximation of objective reality. |
Odin2005 |
Mar-20-07 08:05 AM |
#17 |
-
To a certain extent I agree with that. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 08:16 AM |
#20 |
-
I drew a comic in order to illustrate a point. |
Evoman |
Mar-19-07 11:24 PM |
#11 |
 -
Decidedly missing the point. |
kiahzero |
Mar-19-07 11:48 PM |
#12 |
-
Lol...dude, I think I nailed it. |
Evoman |
Mar-19-07 11:51 PM |
#13 |
 -
LMAO |
trotsky |
Mar-20-07 07:27 AM |
#14 |
 -
No, you really didn't. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 08:06 AM |
#18 |
-
There's another wonderful mechanism of "deep thinkers" |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 07:56 AM |
#16 |
-
We had a similar thread not too long ago |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 09:19 AM |
#28 |
-
Not really. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 09:28 AM |
#30 |
-
Yep, really |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 09:44 AM |
#32 |
-
Except that he's claiming to have two mutually exclusive belief systems. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 09:46 AM |
#35 |
-
You say all grids are equally true |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 09:57 AM |
#38 |
-
That doesn't preclude value judgments. |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:02 AM |
#40 |
-
A distinction without a difference |
cosmik debris |
Mar-20-07 10:12 AM |
#43 |
-
Hardly. (n/t) |
kiahzero |
Mar-20-07 10:15 AM |
#45 |