You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: 6,000 years by which calender? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. 6,000 years by which calender?
If I remember correctly that's 6,000 heavenly years and 1 day in heaven is equal to 10,000 earth years. They're not talking 6,000 Gergorian years. Which would actually be 6,001 years. No year 0 sperating 1 BC and 1 AD. But I could be wrong. I've been wrong before. So there is a very good possibility thsis event will occur again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A question for Young Earth Creationists...How do you explain this? goodboy  Jan-25-07 03:56 PM   #0 
  - Just one of Yahweh's little jokes...the light from those nonexistant objects  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 03:59 PM   #1 
  - That's one theory. Another I've read is that the speed of light used to be greater.  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:07 PM   #9 
     - I'm pretty sure C wasn't accurately calculated before the 19th century  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:19 PM   #22 
        - I don't think they were accurate, either - which, clearly, they weren't.  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:21 PM   #27 
  - or why are there some TREES with more than 7,000 rings?  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 03:59 PM   #2 
  - I don't thik there are trees with that many rings. I think they  thereismore   Jan-25-07 04:09 PM   #12 
  - there most certainly are trees that exist  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:12 PM   #18 
  - The oldest tree so far discovered was Prometheus, a 5000+ year old tree  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:18 PM   #21 
     - THAT'S the one I was thinking about  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:20 PM   #25 
     - Is it a bristlecone?  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:27 PM   #31 
        - I think that's what they're called - some kind of "cone", anyway.  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:35 PM   #40 
           - Oh, wait...I think that tree is a redwood. I suppose I could Google it  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:40 PM   #49 
              - Both bristlecones.  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:42 PM   #56 
                 - Okay thanks. I believe I was thinking of the -largest- tree.  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:45 PM   #64 
  - the Lord Gawdjeezis (tm), the one true Gawd  leftofthedial   Jan-25-07 03:59 PM   #3 
  - The scientists just misunderstand what they see. We can't understand God's creation.  atommom   Jan-25-07 04:00 PM   #4 
  - You are on the right track  StClone   Jan-25-07 04:49 PM   #68 
  - Telescopes, and indeed scientific instruments of any kind,  Lautremont   Jan-25-07 04:01 PM   #5 
  - Wow, I'm glad you told me that!  Turbineguy   Jan-25-07 04:09 PM   # 
  - all right. lets pile on and make fun of xtians....  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:02 PM   #6 
  - this isn't making fun of Christians  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:07 PM   #7 
  - which sect of christianity has supernatural beliefs that...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:16 PM   #20 
     - None. I think they're all equally foolish.  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:20 PM   #24 
        - understood...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:26 PM   #29 
           - Young Earth Creationists DO deserve to be mocked  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:29 PM   #34 
           - is it your opinion that all christians deserve to be mocked?  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:34 PM   #38 
              - Where did I imply that Christians "deserve" to be mocked?  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:36 PM   #42 
              - i was asking you....  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:40 PM   #48 
                 - I think any belief in the supernatural is deluded thinking  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:41 PM   #51 
                    - do you believe the young earth creationists deserve to be mocked? nt  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:43 PM   #57 
                       - Don't you?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:44 PM   #60 
                       - no, i don't...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:50 PM   #70 
                          - LOL  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:51 PM   #71 
                          - mocking people for their beliefs...but you knew what i meant. nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:52 PM   #75 
                             - They're wrong.  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:55 PM   #80 
                                - in other words...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:58 PM   #86 
                                   - That's not at ALL what I said  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 05:02 PM   #91 
                                      - okay...lets do this one question at a time....  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:04 PM   #96 
                                      - for the last fucking time, YES  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 05:07 PM   #100 
                                      - you have done a commendable job in ...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:09 PM   #102 
                                      - Do I mock people...  Hell Hath No Fury   Jan-31-07 01:16 PM   #192 
                          - Prejudice against what? Stupidity?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:51 PM   #73 
                             - religion. nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:53 PM   #76 
                                - We debunked that.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:54 PM   #77 
                                   - i will ask you...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:57 PM   #85 
                                   - No.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:58 PM   #87 
                                      - dude....read this carefully...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:03 PM   #94 
                                      - You dodged my question.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:05 PM   #98 
                                      - i have no doubts about evolution...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:08 PM   #101 
                                      - Bullshit.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:12 PM   #105 
                                      - you continue to bring up holocaust denial....  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:14 PM   #106 
                                      - Let's say it were.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:17 PM   #108 
                                      - dude, why can't you just admit you ridicule them...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:19 PM   #109 
                                      - Because that would be a lie.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:20 PM   #111 
                                      - so you mock young earthers because of their supernatural...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:23 PM   #112 
                                      - No, their false beliefs.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:25 PM   #114 
                                      - so you feel their belief in a supernatural being is false? nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:28 PM   #117 
                                      - Yes.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:31 PM   #119 
                                      - how so? it is this belief that is the basis for...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:32 PM   #121 
                                      - How is young earth creationism demonstratably false?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:33 PM   #122 
                                      - it is demonstrably false...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:39 PM   #128 
                                      - It is demonstrably false period.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:40 PM   #131 
                                      - i am starting to doubt your courage...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:44 PM   #135 
                                      - My courage?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:02 PM   #146 
                                      - I'll tell you what the difference is. You can't *prove* that there is no "God", (particularly when  impeachdubya   Jan-25-07 05:35 PM   #125 
                                      - it is their belief in a supernatural being that is the basis for their...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:41 PM   #133 
                                      - If someone claimed that their belief in a 5000 ft tall, invisible, undetectable orangutan  impeachdubya   Jan-25-07 07:51 PM   #181 
                                      - You are partronizing Christians, IMO,  quantessd   Jan-25-07 07:23 PM   #179 
                                      - Nobody seems to try PROVING in a SCIENTIFIC way the virgin  leeroysphits   Jan-25-07 06:59 PM   #177 
                                      - BRILLIANT! (nt)  goodboy   Jan-25-07 08:39 PM   #187 
                                   - Right. Not about religion. But about a demonstrably false belief  goodboy   Jan-25-07 08:36 PM   #185 
                       - Yes, not because they are Christian, but because they are factually WRONG  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:45 PM   #62 
                       - why do you think they are factually wrong? rational thought and...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:52 PM   #74 
                          - They are factually wrong because it has been proven using the speed of light  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:54 PM   #78 
                          - we are in agreement on the basis of religion...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:59 PM   #88 
                             - for the last time: when it goes contrary to scientific facts  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 05:03 PM   #93 
                                - what aspect of religion does not attempt to override scientific facts?...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:05 PM   #97 
                          - Scientific fact doesn't say anything about the virgin birth...  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:55 PM   #79 
                          - If you remember a thing called the council of Nicea, you will see  goodboy   Jan-25-07 08:39 PM   #186 
                       - She already said "yes" to that  fujiyama   Jan-25-07 05:06 PM   #99 
              - Having said that...  LanternWaste   Jan-25-07 04:43 PM   #58 
           - Jews and Muslims don't generally reject scientific fact. Some individuals might, though  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:31 PM   #36 
              - thus my original point...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:36 PM   #41 
              - Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I consider belief in supernatural anything to be nuts.  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:38 PM   #45 
              - maybe i was not clear enough...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:41 PM   #52 
                 - Gee, I don't know.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:42 PM   #53 
                 - again...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:44 PM   #59 
                    - No.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:45 PM   #63 
                       - i understand your views now. ridicule on hard charger. nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:11 PM   #104 
                          - You understood my beliefs from the beginning.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:26 PM   #115 
                 - When they're nuts and try to convince others to be equally nuts.  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:42 PM   #54 
                 - then my original point...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:45 PM   #61 
                    - at what point do people's "beliefs" override objective reality?  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:49 PM   #69 
                    - I think it's ok to mock based on belief.  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 04:57 PM   #84 
                       - thank you for your honest answer. nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:10 PM   #103 
                 - It's always acceptable. There is no requirement we respect beliefs.  Zhade   Jan-27-07 03:22 PM   #191 
              - Just because someone believes something doesn't make it true  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:39 PM   #46 
              - huh?...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:42 PM   #55 
                 - No...  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 04:46 PM   #65 
              - Billions of flies think shit tastes good.  karlrschneider   Jan-25-07 05:00 PM   #90 
              - They are right. they are flies. It objectively tastes great to them. It's a false allegory. nt  thereismore   Jan-26-07 09:40 AM   #190 
              - HOW ARE YOU GROUPING THE THEORY OF YOUNG EARTH  goodboy   Jan-25-07 10:08 PM   #189 
              - I hate to break this to you  spoony   Jan-25-07 04:55 PM   #82 
              - Sure.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:57 PM   #83 
              - That's not the point...  Solon   Jan-25-07 05:00 PM   #89 
                 - That is simply untrue  spoony   Jan-25-07 05:03 PM   #95 
              - niether do Christians -- this is a pan-sectarian breed of nuttery  0rganism   Jan-25-07 06:45 PM   #172 
  - Because rejecting the magnitude and scope of God's...  1620rock   Jan-25-07 04:07 PM   #10 
  - which facet of religion do you find to be acceptable? or not stupid?...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:10 PM   #15 
     - You didn't ask me...  Bigmack   Jan-25-07 04:29 PM   #35 
        - i am not debating the aspects of religion that people find...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:38 PM   #44 
  - It's not making fun of Christians - it's making fun of Young Earth Creation asswipes.  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:08 PM   #11 
  - that, my friend, is because i am an agnostic...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:15 PM   #19 
     - The existence or lack thereof  fujiyama   Jan-25-07 05:19 PM   #110 
        - then, why do you think young earthers believe that it is? ...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:25 PM   #113 
           - Huh???  piedmont   Jan-25-07 05:39 PM   #129 
           - why do you think they believe it is only 6000 years old? nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:47 PM   #138 
              - A person who says he/she believes the earth is 6,000 years old is a Young Earth Creationist  piedmont   Jan-25-07 06:03 PM   #148 
                 - they believe it because they believe in a supreme being...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:09 PM   #149 
                    - Other people believe in a supreme being without believing that the Bible is a literal chronology  piedmont   Jan-25-07 06:28 PM   #159 
                    - that is not my point...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:34 PM   #164 
                       - Not an easy target-- a necessary target.  piedmont   Jan-25-07 06:48 PM   #173 
                          - how about resurrection?...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:53 PM   #176 
                             - Has anyone deleted science content from textbooks because it conflicts with the resurrection?  piedmont   Jan-25-07 07:13 PM   #178 
                    - bullshit. YEC do not believe the theory because they believe in a  goodboy   Jan-25-07 10:07 PM   #188 
           - not necessarily stupid.. definately deluded n/t  trekbiker   Jan-25-07 06:28 PM   #161 
  - I'm a Christian, and DO NOT subscribe to the "Young Earth"  Glorfindel   Jan-25-07 04:10 PM   #14 
  - which of the ideas of the myriad of sects of christianity do you..  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:11 PM   #17 
     - why don't you start your own..  CATagious   Jan-25-07 06:37 PM   #166 
  - OK, good idea. Thanks.  mr blur   Jan-25-07 04:11 PM   #16 
  - Christians?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:22 PM   #28 
  - there are some christians that do. nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:27 PM   #30 
     - There are some Christians that are into holocaust denial.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:27 PM   #33 
        - christians that hold to a...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 04:32 PM   #37 
           - do you respect christians at all?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 04:35 PM   #39 
           - i have enough respect not to ridicule their superatural beliefs...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:15 PM   #107 
              - You apparently don't respect their beliefs...  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:28 PM   #116 
                 - a circle jerk takes more than one person...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:30 PM   #118 
                    - Feeling outnumbered, Jerome?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:32 PM   #120 
                       - of course i am outnumbered...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:34 PM   #124 
                       - So, when you mock Ahmadinejad for his views...  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:36 PM   #126 
                          - is that his religious belief? nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:40 PM   #130 
                             - If it were would you respect it?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:41 PM   #132 
                                - is that his religious belief? you actually should...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:45 PM   #136 
                                   - LOL.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:47 PM   #137 
                                      - is it a religious belief of his? nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:48 PM   #139 
                                         - Would that make a difference to you?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:48 PM   #140 
                                            - it makes it relevant here. otherwise, start a thread on his...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:51 PM   #142 
                                            - "i promise to respond"  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:52 PM   #143 
                                            - start a thread tying his religion to this statement and i will respond...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 05:54 PM   #144 
                                            - You've spent a dozen posts dodging the question.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 05:59 PM   #145 
                                            - no i have not...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:03 PM   #147 
                                            - There's another one.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:10 PM   #150 
                                            - no, my whole argument is why..  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:13 PM   #151 
                                            - You haven't got an argument.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:15 PM   #152 
                                            - destroyed by what? your prejudice?  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:19 PM   #153 
                                            - There's another one!  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:23 PM   #154 
                                            - i got an idea, destroyer...i'll start the thread...then you can follow in.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:23 PM   #155 
                                            - destroyer?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:25 PM   #157 
                                            - your a destroyer dude. thats a cool name, like Conan. nt.  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:27 PM   #158 
                                            - That's deep, Jerome.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:28 PM   #160 
                                            - no, not taking your brow beating...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:29 PM   #162 
                                            - It's your topic Jerome.  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:32 PM   #163 
                                            - no, you can go back and see my original questions...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:36 PM   #165 
                                            - So your answer is then, A, huh?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:39 PM   #167 
                                            - my answer is what i gave...  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:40 PM   #168 
                                            - My answer?  Bornaginhooligan   Jan-25-07 06:41 PM   #169 
                                            - you hooligan, you  k_jerome   Jan-25-07 06:43 PM   #170 
                       - OMG! It's Jerome again?  Crunchy Frog   Jan-25-07 08:10 PM   #182 
           - The young earth thing has mountains of observable scientific  Lautremont   Jan-25-07 04:51 PM   #72 
           - No Jews  MrWiggles   Jan-31-07 02:35 PM   #193 
  - Eh. If you want to peddle crap like a 6,000 year old Earth off as "science"  impeachdubya   Jan-25-07 04:55 PM   #81 
  - If you have been around for awhile  hyphenate   Jan-25-07 06:24 PM   #156 
  - Did you even read my original post? (nt)  goodboy   Jan-25-07 08:30 PM   #184 
  - That is a beautiful picture  TechBear_Seattle   Jan-25-07 04:07 PM   #8 
  - God painted that star that color!  madinmaryland   Jan-25-07 04:09 PM   #13 
  - 6,000 years by which calender?  Wizard777   Jan-25-07 04:19 PM   #23 
  - Oh, that's pretty...did you draw that yourself?  cynatnite   Jan-25-07 04:21 PM   #26 
  - God put it there to make you ask questions. Duh! n/t  racaulk   Jan-25-07 04:27 PM   #32 
  - If you really want to blow their minds just ask them to explain pi and it's uses.  Bandit   Jan-25-07 04:38 PM   #43 
  - Good question, but if you really want a YEC to play with you should look elsewhere  piedmont   Jan-25-07 04:40 PM   #47 
  - Not a YEC, but I don't understand the imputation  atre   Jan-25-07 04:40 PM   #50 
  - It is a distance, but it also measures time.  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-25-07 04:47 PM   #67 
     - You know  hyphenate   Jan-25-07 06:50 PM   #175 
        - Bill Hicks said it well - "Do you really think that God wants to fuck with us?"  Rabrrrrrr   Jan-31-07 05:06 PM   #195 
  - Those stars and planets are actually much closer.  quantessd   Jan-25-07 04:47 PM   #66 
  - God I Love Astronomy. What A Beautiful Picture!  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jan-25-07 05:02 PM   #92 
  - jesus threw the frisbee a bit too far?  SoCalDem   Jan-25-07 05:34 PM   #123 
  - Would you believe this was answered for me by a guy  hfojvt   Jan-25-07 05:38 PM   #127 
  - I do not doubt that he flunked his physics course. nm  CATagious   Jan-25-07 06:50 PM   #174 
  - Yes, I would believe it.  piedmont   Jan-25-07 07:25 PM   #180 
  - Stars are just pinholes in the fabric of night  EstimatedProphet   Jan-25-07 05:44 PM   #134 
  - this thread = hillarious  WindRavenX   Jan-25-07 05:49 PM   #141 
  - The speed of light is different in different places at different times  slackmaster   Jan-25-07 06:45 PM   #171 
  - There is no such thing at time. Everything is happening at this moment  Nikia   Jan-25-07 08:27 PM   #183 
  - Your intellectualism allows you to be duped by Satan's trickery  cain_7777   Jan-31-07 02:52 PM   #194 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC