and-justice-for-all
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-25-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
"I dont suppose g-d was created" at all.. Yes, time, is measureable and very proveable. It takes light "Time" to cross "Distance" and that light is measurable. Point of origin would be the "begining" and these is no end, other then when it crosses with matter. But, Time is inffinent. I think light is proof of Time, from point A to point B takes TIME. Time is a unit of measure. I dont have "Faith" in time, thats absurd. "Faith" is believeing what you know isnt so, it is not so because there is no evidence supporting "Faith", notta-nothing-zero. Time is measurable, Faith is blind.
Gravity = PROVABLE/Measurable MATTER = PROVABLE/Tangable and measurable PORTONS = PROVABLE/Tangable and measureable Faith = Make-believe and wishful thinking. Not tangable and only measurable by head count of the delusionalmasses who follow things which can not be measured or proven to exist.
Blackholes are measurable and provable, you can even tell through observation that there is a massive blackhole in the center of our galaxy. Because of the light that crosses space and time that comes into contact with the blackhole, bends and that can been seen. The black hole also effects time itself.
Gravity is determined by mass, mass can be measured and its gravitational effect calculated based on observations and proven theories that support it.
String Theory has not been proven, but continues to be debated about.
|
| -What I found out about God... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 12:44 AM |
#0 |
-
Or God is only a myth for the weak. n/t |
Erika |
Dec-25-06 12:58 AM |
#1 |
-
Why would a devout Christian |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 01:16 AM |
#2 |
-
BINGO! We have a winner! |
RC |
Dec-25-06 05:10 AM |
#3 |
 -
The adulterated and abused version of Christianity |
peanutbrittle |
Dec-25-06 07:30 AM |
#6 |
-
Thank you..DU has begun to lose all credibility with most of the |
Oleladylib |
Dec-25-06 08:49 AM |
#7 |
-
Were you always a hypocrite or did you learn that in Sunday school? |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 02:10 PM |
#8 |
-
Who is Charles Bradlaugh |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 02:43 PM |
#9 |
 -
Google is your friend. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 02:56 PM |
#10 |
  -
Well thanks for your honesty |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 06:53 PM |
#14 |
 -
Do you think my absence of faith means I'm somehow deficient? |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:07 PM |
#18 |
  -
Not at all |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 07:32 PM |
#24 |
 -
I'm closer to enlightenment than true christians? |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:38 PM |
#26 |
 -
I must correct myself |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 05:22 AM |
#67 |
 -
And your Edgar Caycian "definition" of God is as clear as mud. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:25 PM |
#22 |
 -
Glad you ask |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 07:40 PM |
#27 |
 -
No, it's definitely beyond explanation. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:49 PM |
#29 |
 -
If it is baloney you want then it is baloney you get. |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 07:54 PM |
#32 |
 -
Actually, what I wanted was the definition and/or explanation of God you claimed to have. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:58 PM |
#33 |
 -
Well I gave it in the above post titled :"glad you asked" |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:20 PM |
#40 |
 -
No, you didn't. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 08:26 PM |
#41 |
 -
Well universal consciousness is the definition of god |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:31 PM |
#44 |
 -
"Universal consciousness" |
trotsky |
Dec-25-06 08:36 PM |
#46 |
  -
First let me explain that this is not my theory |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:57 PM |
#52 |
 -
So, you believe in it but can't explain it or prove it exists. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 09:02 PM |
#55 |
 -
Sorry, not going to do your research for you. |
trotsky |
Dec-25-06 09:02 PM |
#56 |
 -
Trotsky I should have know you would be here. |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 09:18 PM |
#59 |
 -
Ah, the Peewee Herman belief system. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 08:38 PM |
#47 |
 -
Yep, I think you are the only one who sees irony in that. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 03:02 PM |
#11 |
-
I would be glad to |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 06:42 PM |
#12 |
-
The term "G-d" used in a... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 07:04 PM |
#17 |
 -
"well then, who created G-d?" |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 07:23 PM |
#21 |
-
Your failure to grasp physics is astounding n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 07:34 PM |
#25 |
 -
Are you trying to tell me that string theory is also a myth? n/t |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 07:43 PM |
#28 |
  -
String theory is a theory |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 07:51 PM |
#31 |
   -
Well it could be considered that |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:00 PM |
#36 |
    -
We need to agree on some terms. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 08:06 PM |
#38 |
   -
you could still call it a theory |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:28 PM |
#42 |
   -
What natural phenomena |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 08:58 PM |
#53 |
   -
It explains all natural phenomenon |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 05:37 AM |
#68 |
   -
You are missing a few things |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 07:54 AM |
#75 |
   -
Gravity is not the force that holds things together? prove it? |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 08:19 AM |
#79 |
   -
When you have mastered this, get back to me |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 08:23 AM |
#80 |
   -
I am aware of the strong and weak nuclear force theory |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 08:40 AM |
#83 |
   -
It is true that not all things are explained |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 08:46 AM |
#84 |
   -
Later then...gota go to work n/t |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 08:49 AM |
#86 |
   -
Ha. string theory is barely even a hypothesis. |
Evoman |
Dec-25-06 09:32 PM |
#61 |
  -
I stand corrected. n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 09:37 PM |
#64 |
  -
NO... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 08:02 PM |
#37 |
 -
LOL....Physics isnt for everyone...nt |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 08:32 PM |
#45 |
-
That speed of gravity thing really gets me laughing! |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 08:42 PM |
#48 |
-
Lets see.... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 07:59 PM |
#35 |
-
So in some other universe |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:14 PM |
#39 |
-
.....Oh my... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 08:31 PM |
#43 |
-
You've given me nothing |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 07:31 PM |
#23 |
 -
You will have to get your own evidence |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 07:49 PM |
#30 |
-
So you have no evidence |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 07:59 PM |
#34 |
-
No I said I have no evidence for you |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 08:42 PM |
#49 |
-
So your evidence is entirely subjective. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 08:48 PM |
#50 |
-
No it is entirely personal |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 09:07 PM |
#57 |
-
can I ask what your personal evidence is? |
Evoman |
Dec-25-06 09:35 PM |
#62 |
 -
I can only say that it convinced me as an atheist |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 05:45 AM |
#69 |
-
That's what I said, subjective evidence |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 09:35 PM |
#63 |
-
Objective...subjective... |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 06:11 AM |
#70 |
-
Of course that's not objective, don't be silly. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 07:38 AM |
#73 |
-
Then by your definition it was objective |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 08:01 AM |
#76 |
-
You say it is reproducible -- so reproduce it. |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 08:14 AM |
#78 |
-
Oh yes the Amazing Randy challenge |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 08:30 AM |
#81 |
-
In other words, you can't reproduce it |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 08:39 AM |
#82 |
-
Could it be that they want to know the truth? |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 08:47 AM |
#85 |
-
You metaphor is defective |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 08:52 AM |
#87 |
-
God is the Borg? |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 08:55 PM |
#51 |
-
I'm traveling at the speed of gravity!!! n/t |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 09:02 PM |
#54 |
 -
No you are travailing at a speed because of gravity n/t |
zeemike |
Dec-25-06 09:13 PM |
#58 |
-
You're joking, right? |
cosmik debris |
Dec-25-06 09:22 PM |
#60 |
-
No joke |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 06:19 AM |
#71 |
-
WOW! Not only did you fail to grasp physics |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 07:14 AM |
#72 |
-
What in your world the properties of gravity are different? |
zeemike |
Dec-26-06 07:41 AM |
#74 |
-
In my world |
cosmik debris |
Dec-26-06 08:04 AM |
#77 |
-
Borg , Star Trek Borg thats, are pretty killer... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-26-06 12:11 AM |
#65 |
-
You rock!!! nt |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 06:50 PM |
#13 |
 -
What is it with people who don't read the articles in here? |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:01 PM |
#15 |
-
This is perhaps why... |
and-justice-for-all |
Dec-25-06 07:13 PM |
#20 |
-
Theiropinion about Christianity as you put it...yes, portrays |
Oleladylib |
Dec-25-06 07:02 PM |
#16 |
-
See, that's the thing, the op isn't his opinion. It's the title of the article, oh-enlightened-one. |
beam me up scottie |
Dec-25-06 07:09 PM |
#19 |
-
Your not a very nice person...calling people idiots. |
Evoman |
Dec-26-06 01:08 AM |
#66 |
-
Agreed |
Sherman A1 |
Dec-25-06 06:27 AM |
#4 |
-
woooops! there it is! |
xchrom |
Dec-25-06 06:29 AM |
#5 |