You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: what, one scholar? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. what, one scholar?
Of course not. Most of the writings you mention, of course, were "discovered" buried or lost in monestaries somewhere. No one in Europe had ever heard about any of these authors, then various groups of people start "discovering" ancient manuscripts.

"buried the rosetta stone in northern Africa, and went around writing latin graffiti on roman ruins (including those buried by the volcanic eruption of Vesuvius), built a bunch of pyramids and stele in Egypt and covered them with hieroglyphics to be deciphered in the 19th century, just to make it all look convincing"

I don't think you are being serious now. Can you give us solid dates for these artifacts? By that I mean publically available, peer reviewed dating for these artifacts?

And just for the record - during the Renaisance era writings, books, scuptures, paintings, and statues were "discovered" and sold as ancient - and exposed as frauds by the contemporaries. There is a long, long history of frauds done the Renaisaance - mentioned by people such as Isaac Newton, Acilla, etc.

It's a very interesting litany you have there - have you actually looked into any of this primary historical evidence for yourself - or did you read about this in abstracts and encyclopedias? Seriously.

Much of this hasn't even been looked at since the 1800s, when the standards in science and archaeology were very very primitive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -History: Fiction or Science? by Anatoly Fomenko InvisibleBallots  Dec-22-04 12:23 PM   #0 
  - Just because we have no documents from the period of ancient  lutherj   Dec-22-04 12:52 PM   #1 
  - actually, there is a big, big difference  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 01:04 PM   #2 
     - there is no such thing as an "unbroken consistent record"  imenja   Dec-22-04 02:11 PM   #7 
     - er, that's not the issue really  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 02:24 PM   #9 
     - So are you saying that some incredibly prodigious and uncannily  lutherj   Dec-23-04 11:57 AM   #21 
        - what, one scholar?  InvisibleBallots   Dec-23-04 12:08 PM   #22 
        - So you are saying that Star Trek is FICTION???  InvisibleBallots   Dec-23-04 12:18 PM   #23 
  - history is an art, neither science nor fiction  imenja   Dec-22-04 01:49 PM   #3 
  - history can be true, or false - right, or wrong  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 02:03 PM   #5 
     - obviously  imenja   Dec-22-04 02:15 PM   #8 
        - no, what those facts mean is a different question  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 02:27 PM   #10 
           - I'm afraid you simply don't know what history is  imenja   Dec-22-04 02:39 PM   #12 
              - oh, okay, then nevermind  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 02:44 PM   #14 
                 - as I began, history is an art  imenja   Dec-22-04 03:26 PM   #16 
                 - okay then, forget I said "History" - let's talk Chronology  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 05:38 PM   #18 
                 - Please remember that education is meant to open your mind, not close it  imenja   Dec-22-04 04:20 PM   #17 
                    - really? The purpose of education is NOT to close your mind?  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 05:41 PM   #19 
                       - Octavio Paz  imenja   Dec-23-04 12:14 AM   #20 
                          - "I don't see evidence that your mind is open to different ideas"  InvisibleBallots   Dec-23-04 07:48 PM   #24 
                             - fair enough  imenja   Dec-23-04 08:16 PM   #25 
  - also, the source information you rightly request is available in footnotes  imenja   Dec-22-04 02:02 PM   #4 
     - hey, Ann Coutler has lots of footnotes in her books!  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 02:07 PM   #6 
        - Ann Coulter is not a historian  imenja   Dec-22-04 02:29 PM   #11 
           - please read my post again  InvisibleBallots   Dec-22-04 02:39 PM   #13 
              - Academic presses, truth, sources, and Ann Coulter  imenja   Dec-22-04 03:10 PM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC