InvisibleBallots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Of course not. Most of the writings you mention, of course, were "discovered" buried or lost in monestaries somewhere. No one in Europe had ever heard about any of these authors, then various groups of people start "discovering" ancient manuscripts.
"buried the rosetta stone in northern Africa, and went around writing latin graffiti on roman ruins (including those buried by the volcanic eruption of Vesuvius), built a bunch of pyramids and stele in Egypt and covered them with hieroglyphics to be deciphered in the 19th century, just to make it all look convincing"
I don't think you are being serious now. Can you give us solid dates for these artifacts? By that I mean publically available, peer reviewed dating for these artifacts?
And just for the record - during the Renaisance era writings, books, scuptures, paintings, and statues were "discovered" and sold as ancient - and exposed as frauds by the contemporaries. There is a long, long history of frauds done the Renaisaance - mentioned by people such as Isaac Newton, Acilla, etc.
It's a very interesting litany you have there - have you actually looked into any of this primary historical evidence for yourself - or did you read about this in abstracts and encyclopedias? Seriously.
Much of this hasn't even been looked at since the 1800s, when the standards in science and archaeology were very very primitive...
|
| -History: Fiction or Science? by Anatoly Fomenko |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 12:23 PM |
#0 |
-
Just because we have no documents from the period of ancient |
lutherj |
Dec-22-04 12:52 PM |
#1 |
 -
actually, there is a big, big difference |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 01:04 PM |
#2 |
-
there is no such thing as an "unbroken consistent record" |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 02:11 PM |
#7 |
 -
er, that's not the issue really |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 02:24 PM |
#9 |
-
So are you saying that some incredibly prodigious and uncannily |
lutherj |
Dec-23-04 11:57 AM |
#21 |
-
what, one scholar? |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-23-04 12:08 PM |
#22 |
-
So you are saying that Star Trek is FICTION??? |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-23-04 12:18 PM |
#23 |
-
history is an art, neither science nor fiction |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 01:49 PM |
#3 |
 -
history can be true, or false - right, or wrong |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 02:03 PM |
#5 |
-
obviously |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 02:15 PM |
#8 |
-
no, what those facts mean is a different question |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 02:27 PM |
#10 |
-
I'm afraid you simply don't know what history is |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 02:39 PM |
#12 |
-
oh, okay, then nevermind |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 02:44 PM |
#14 |
-
as I began, history is an art |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 03:26 PM |
#16 |
 -
okay then, forget I said "History" - let's talk Chronology |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 05:38 PM |
#18 |
-
Please remember that education is meant to open your mind, not close it |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 04:20 PM |
#17 |
-
really? The purpose of education is NOT to close your mind? |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 05:41 PM |
#19 |
-
Octavio Paz |
imenja |
Dec-23-04 12:14 AM |
#20 |
-
"I don't see evidence that your mind is open to different ideas" |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-23-04 07:48 PM |
#24 |
-
fair enough |
imenja |
Dec-23-04 08:16 PM |
#25 |
-
also, the source information you rightly request is available in footnotes |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 02:02 PM |
#4 |
-
hey, Ann Coutler has lots of footnotes in her books! |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 02:07 PM |
#6 |
-
Ann Coulter is not a historian |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 02:29 PM |
#11 |
-
please read my post again |
InvisibleBallots |
Dec-22-04 02:39 PM |
#13 |
-
Academic presses, truth, sources, and Ann Coulter |
imenja |
Dec-22-04 03:10 PM |
#15 |