You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #12: Well, the reason we have an annonymous forum is so we don't have to reveal our contributions [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Well, the reason we have an annonymous forum is so we don't have to reveal our contributions
Edited on Sun May-15-11 02:01 PM by Bill Bored
Some of us are already targets of those who are trying to derail our efforts. Charmin may be one such disruptor by discrediting the movement with his poll talk. Powers that be don't take this, or anything else we have to say, very seriously. They just want to trust their voting machines. That's why the problem isn't going to be fixed any time soon.

So, are you suggesting that they're using exit poll data in WI, or what?

I thought it was a recount. And BTW, they are only recounting about 1/3 of the ballots by hand, IIRC.

But suppose there's a poll result that differs substantially from the machine counts? What then?

Is there a lawyer willing to go to court and claim there is fraud and fight for a 100% hand count, while simultaneously making sure the paper ballots have been preserved inviolate since the election?

Unfortunately that ship seems to have sailed and I don't know of any attorneys willing to take election officials and their voting system to court based on the results of a poll. Why do you suppose that is? If it's true, then why spend so much time reading polls? It didn't work for Harry Truman, did it? (I believe he won, despite what the polls were saying.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -Richard Charnin (DU's TruthIsAll) to speak on election fraud, May 26 in Florida: bleever  May-08-11 02:26 PM   #0 
  - I hope he has better stuff to work with  Pab Sungenis   May-08-11 02:48 PM   #1 
  - I think you're misquoting him. It's more like "...that proves Kerry won."  Bill Bored   May-12-11 04:21 PM   #2 
     - Do you honestly think your attitude helps anything?  emcguffie   May-14-11 09:45 AM   #4 
        - scary: "these guys prove all kinds of things with numbers"  OnTheOtherHand   May-14-11 12:04 PM   #5 
        - So if I don't believe some physicist's proof about mesons or --  emcguffie   May-15-11 10:25 AM   #8 
           - "Anything I don't understand or can't see on my own...I shouldn't believe?"  Bill Bored   May-16-11 12:17 AM   #15 
           - Bertrand Russell had a pretty good start  OnTheOtherHand   May-16-11 05:14 AM   #16 
        - You bet! Here's why:  Bill Bored   May-14-11 11:10 PM   #7 
           - Hmm, I think people do use his numbers.  emcguffie   May-15-11 10:30 AM   #9 
              - Well, the reason we have an annonymous forum is so we don't have to reveal our contributions  Bill Bored   May-15-11 01:59 PM   #12 
              - What are you trying to say?  emcguffie   May-15-11 05:59 PM   #13 
                 - The OP was about Charmin's work with exit polls, wasn't it?  Bill Bored   May-15-11 08:12 PM   #14 
              - "They are using his numbers in Wisconsin"  OnTheOtherHand   May-16-11 05:28 AM   #17 
  - kick  Bill Bored   May-12-11 04:26 PM   #3 
  - Richard Charnin's reply.  emcguffie   May-15-11 10:47 AM   #10 
     - beware of people who try to use you as a sock puppet  OnTheOtherHand   May-16-11 08:23 AM   #18 
     - TIA bashing levers, as usual. ES&S applauds.  Wilms   May-21-11 10:00 AM   #19 
        - These details are someone else's problem -- NOT TIA's.  Bill Bored   May-22-11 04:53 PM   #20 
  - Fun to watch the sniping.  bleever   May-14-11 06:42 PM   #6 
  - Here is some interesting reading about Wisconsin.  emcguffie   May-15-11 11:09 AM   #11 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC