You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Here is some interesting reading about Wisconsin. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Here is some interesting reading about Wisconsin.
Whoops! It's using Richard Charnin's numbers!

http://myplayfulself.com/wordpress/archives/5311

It makes a lot of sense to me. Must be something wrong with my brain?


FRAUD 4 Spread Sheets & Vote Bags
May 13th, 2011 | Author: Dennis Kern

Richard Charnin is a member of the Election Integrity Group on face book, who has compiled a spreadsheet which leads to a question. If Kloppenburg did better than Obama in 24 of the 72 counties, why did she do so much worse in the largest counties?

I am not a spreadsheet guy, but Richard lays it out so even I can see the anomaly he is talking about. He is looking at the percentage of vote Obama received and comparing that percentage with that of Kloppenburg in the Supreme Court Election. The assumption is that the percentage of vote that went to Obama in the presidential election should be close to the percentage of vote that went to Kloppenburg, and it works out.ALMOST. Here is the suspicious anomaly:

Below is the anomaly as described by Richard


This is a comparison of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the 2008 presidential elections.
Prosser leads by 7,000 out of nearly 1.5 million votes.

In 2008, Obama had 56.2% of the recorded vote, a 415,000 vote margin out of nearly 3 million votes. Considering the heavy union turnout, how did Kloppenburgs vote share decline by 6.5% from Obamas?

Kloppenburg did better than Obama in 10 small counties (total 50,000 votes) but worse in 10 large counties (550,000 votes).

In Milwaukee County, Obama had 67.3%, Kloppenburg 56.4% of 229,000 votes. Why the 10.9% decline?

In Waukesha County, Obama had 36.6%, Kloppenburg 26.2% of 125,000 votes. Why the 10.4% decline?

In Waukesha, McCain defeated Obama by 59,813 votes out of 233,435 recorded.

Prosser defeated Kloppenburg by a nearly identical 59,505 votes out of just 125,070.

Quite a gain.


YES. Quite a gainindeed.
You can look at the documentation of this anomaly on the spread sheet on Richards web site

One anomaly leads to another VOTE BAGS


There's a lot more. http://myplayfulself.com/wordpress/archives/5311

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC