You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: Well, thank you for that. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well, thank you for that.
It will take me a while to write a response to the two posts above yours. But I'm going to work on that.

There is so much evidence of election fraud it's hard to describe it. It is all around us. I don't know about Wisconsin, and that is a question I would like answered, but I feel like I shouldn't even ask it as I am so ignorant.

I don't know what kinds of machines are hackable and which ones aren't. So when someone says they could have been hacked, and someone else says they couldn't have been hacked, I have no idea who is correct. I do know that here in NJ back in -- whenever it was, I forget -- I went to meetings with our local reps, freeholders they are, I think, and watched a computer scientist from Princeton tell them that the machines they were putting in were terrible, could be hacked, couldn't be made safe, on and on and on, and what did they do? They put those machines in. That in itself makes me suspicious. Something is wrong when that happens. Makes me wonder about Carmine Casiano (SP?).

I still believe they are stealing the elections. Regularly and in an organized fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -VOTING MACHINES = TRIGGER - We must get rid of those g-damned computer voting machines! kpete  Mar-12-11 11:37 AM   #0 
  - K&R  jemelanson   Mar-12-11 11:39 AM   #1 
  - Case in point:  Blue Owl   Mar-12-11 11:48 AM   #2 
  - I've had my suspicions since November  DemReadingDU   Mar-12-11 11:52 AM   #3 
  - You know we have paper ballots in WIsconsin, right?  eyesroll   Mar-12-11 11:54 AM   #4 
  - The fudging come in at the collection point  Demeter   Mar-12-11 12:19 PM   #5 
  - Yes, Florida got a paper ballot and still certifies electronic totals! Only audits 1-2%  SugarShack   Apr-19-11 12:06 PM   #22 
  - Do you have a link to the post you're citing?  Wilms   Mar-12-11 12:59 PM   #7 
  - What percentage of the scanned ballots is compared to the machine totals? That is the question.  Peace Patriot   Mar-12-11 02:03 PM   #9 
  - AMEN! I agree wholeheartedly. When those came in, our freedoms went out.  Frustratedlady   Mar-12-11 12:23 PM   #6 
  - Great reminder.  think4yourself   Mar-12-11 01:06 PM   #8 
  - I have a question but I can't post  emcguffie   Mar-12-11 02:30 PM   #10 
     - Pitching TIA's methodology would be the surest way of having the issue ignored.  Wilms   Mar-12-11 02:38 PM   #11 
        - But what he says makes sense.  emcguffie   Mar-13-11 01:09 PM   #12 
           - Like I stated, counting enough ballots would be a really good idea.  Wilms   Mar-13-11 02:09 PM   #13 
              - Well, I'm guessing that's what a lot of activists are working on.  emcguffie   Mar-13-11 11:36 PM   #14 
                 - for what it's worth...  OnTheOtherHand   Mar-14-11 07:58 AM   #15 
                 - Well, I disagree.  emcguffie   Apr-13-11 08:41 PM   #19 
                 - Part of the problem is that TIA's work is offered up as some absolute proof.  Wilms   Mar-14-11 09:09 AM   #16 
                 - Maybe I'm really stupid.  emcguffie   Apr-13-11 08:57 PM   #20 
                    - You asked why some give TIA a thumbs down. I told you why I did.  Wilms   Apr-14-11 09:00 AM   #21 
                 - Electronic voting  Democracydiva   Mar-16-11 01:27 AM   #17 
                    - Well, thank you for that.  emcguffie   Mar-16-11 05:07 PM   #18 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC