You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #33: then you have friends who can tell you about the election center and who funded it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. then you have friends who can tell you about the election center and who funded it.
and its history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -EAC Initiates Formal Investigation Into ES&S Optical Scanners Wilms  Mar-08-11 09:33 PM   #0 
  - Good! Please follow Debra Bowen's example.  tabatha   Mar-08-11 09:38 PM   #1 
  - Thanks, Wilms  BeFree   Mar-08-11 09:45 PM   #2 
  - The EAC might only be doing this to look like they're doing something.  Wilms   Mar-09-11 08:26 PM   #4 
     - Something tells me they are the fox watching the hen house. they are Bush appointees.  robinlynne   May-21-11 03:34 PM   #18 
  - 'Bout Blankety Blank #&^$*!!## Time!  Melissa G   Mar-09-11 08:09 PM   #3 
  - kick nt  Bill Bored   Mar-23-11 10:26 PM   #5 
  - Isn't the EAC still stacked with voting companies? the exact same people Bush  robinlynne   May-19-11 01:34 PM   #6 
     - No. Well, ok. No. And, no.  Wilms   May-21-11 09:30 AM   #7 
     - NASED. read about NASED. read who they are. they are not the people you want in charge of your  robinlynne   May-21-11 11:10 AM   #8 
     - I already said NASED is worse.  Wilms   May-21-11 11:37 AM   #9 
        - the resignation was many years ago; I dont even remember his name.  robinlynne   May-21-11 01:37 PM   #10 
        - interesting: 2 seats are vacant on the EAC. the other 2 are Bush appointees.  robinlynne   May-21-11 01:41 PM   #11 
        - ok. the chiar of the EAC was the chair of NASED and came from the Election Center, fully funded  robinlynne   May-21-11 01:50 PM   #12 
           - I pointed to the inaccuracies of your previous post. And you've not posted a single link to refute.  Wilms   May-21-11 02:45 PM   #14 
              - use the google. both are true. google eac for link to the first. google the leciton center for  robinlynne   May-21-11 03:23 PM   #16 
              - WTF are you talking about..."I'm not going to do the work for you."  Wilms   May-21-11 04:03 PM   #21 
              - umm  OnTheOtherHand   May-21-11 04:12 PM   #25 
                 - It was created and funded in 1980.  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:19 PM   #28 
                    - and your point is?  OnTheOtherHand   May-21-11 06:07 PM   #48 
              - no inaccuracies. no inaccurate conclusions. Just because you dont read doesn't mean it isnt so....  robinlynne   May-21-11 03:32 PM   #17 
                 - Your behavior is what's rude.  Wilms   May-21-11 04:05 PM   #22 
                    - You are in the EI community?  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:17 PM   #27 
                       - Yeah.  Wilms   May-21-11 04:24 PM   #31 
                          - then you have friends who can tell you about the election center and who funded it.  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:25 PM   #33 
                             - I'm sufficently aware  Wilms   May-21-11 04:32 PM   #34 
                                - The EAC as it is right now, with 2 Bush appointees, at least one comong from the Election Cneter,  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:44 PM   #38 
                                   - More assertions.  Wilms   May-21-11 04:50 PM   #40 
                                      - what whole thing? the EAC testing ES&S? then we agree.  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:59 PM   #42 
                                         - We easily agree on a range of issues.  Wilms   May-21-11 05:09 PM   #44 
                                            - Look at this: election center task report on the 2004 eleciton, fascinaitng reading.  robinlynne   May-21-11 05:19 PM   #45 
     - so simple; Here's a link it took 2 seconds; #2 the election center funded by evoting vendors:  robinlynne   May-21-11 03:47 PM   #20 
        - Indeed, that seems correct...and not what you continue to assert.  Wilms   May-21-11 04:07 PM   #23 
           - just read. It was fully funded by the voting companies. Who else funded it?  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:17 PM   #26 
              - You've actually read the SourceWatch bit and STILL post "fully funded"?  Wilms   May-21-11 04:23 PM   #30 
     - ok, goggled the two EAc commissioners. both Bush appointees. One is republican.  robinlynne   May-21-11 02:05 PM   #13 
        - Cool! Google is back up.  Wilms   May-21-11 02:51 PM   #15 
        - EAC 101  OnTheOtherHand   May-21-11 03:39 PM   #19 
           - Why do you hate torches and pitch-forks? n/t  Wilms   May-21-11 04:09 PM   #24 
           - The preisdent chooses the commissioners not congress. They need senate approval. I don't  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:22 PM   #29 
           - here, from the EAc website: The four EAC commissioners are appointed by the president and confirmed  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:24 PM   #32 
              - And...  Wilms   May-21-11 04:32 PM   #35 
                 - the poster said congress chooses EAc commissioners. It is the president.  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:36 PM   #36 
                    - Eye-yi-yi.  Wilms   May-21-11 04:42 PM   #37 
                       - and? still Obama's call. Are the two womne in palce right now Dems? I dont know the answer to that.  robinlynne   May-21-11 04:48 PM   #39 
                          - Good luck with that.  Wilms   May-21-11 04:52 PM   #41 
                          - It is a training center. It trains election officials. to have specific goals for elections.  robinlynne   May-21-11 05:03 PM   #43 
                             - I think who they are and what they do is self-evident within the realm of industry associations.  Wilms   May-21-11 05:21 PM   #46 
                                - so you think electronic voting is ok then? that it is just like the introduction of tv?  robinlynne   May-21-11 05:40 PM   #47 
                                   - wow, where have you been for the last five years?  OnTheOtherHand   May-21-11 06:23 PM   #50 
                                      - he, Wilms, compared electronic voting to television. I am strongly against it. It is not verifiable.  robinlynne   May-21-11 06:32 PM   #51 
                                         - How about this?  Bill Bored   May-22-11 08:45 PM   #62 
                          - if you had read my post, you would know the answer to that  OnTheOtherHand   May-21-11 06:13 PM   #49 
                             - i'm not following you. I have been responding to Wilms. If as he says, electronic  robinlynne   May-21-11 06:38 PM   #52 
                                - Wilms said no such thing about "the future"  OnTheOtherHand   May-21-11 07:16 PM   #53 
                                   - Here are his words:  robinlynne   May-21-11 07:56 PM   #54 
                                      - who said "inevitable"?  OnTheOtherHand   May-22-11 08:18 AM   #55 
                                         - This will be my last post. Bush created HAVA. HAVA created the EAC. So why is it  robinlynne   May-22-11 11:45 AM   #56 
                                         - presidents do not create laws  OnTheOtherHand   May-22-11 01:27 PM   #57 
                                         - I would argue that committee members, and esp. chairs, create laws.  Bill Bored   May-22-11 06:16 PM   #59 
                                         - More on Butterfly Ballot Creator Theresa LePore  Bill Bored   May-22-11 07:18 PM   #60 
                                         - High DRE failure rates could have a VERY partisan effect. EAC did nothing to improve that standard.  Bill Bored   May-22-11 06:11 PM   #58 
                                         - "I like to think that they (Repubs) would...plug security holes that anyone can exploit."  Bill Bored   May-22-11 07:35 PM   #61 
                                            - well, that "quotation" kind of misses the point  OnTheOtherHand   May-23-11 04:54 AM   #63 
                                               - I don't disagree, but AFAIK, the code was not disclosed intentionally. nt  Bill Bored   May-23-11 01:36 PM   #64 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC