You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: "progressive losses in San Francisco under ranked choice voting" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "progressive losses in San Francisco under ranked choice voting"

District-By-District Analysis
MACHINE BEATEN!
______
FERRELL, COHEN
VICTORIOUS;
WIENER, KIM ALSO
WIN ALL ARE
NON-MACHINE
CANDIDATES
________

Bay Guardian In Denial As Its Slate Card Flops
________

Peskin Also Loses Ballot Propositions, Judicial Race
...
The Bay Guardian prides itself on the political clout of its election Endorsements which fill the entire front page and seemed weirdly in denial after all its first choice candidates for Supervisor lost. It ran a long article extolling the virtues for progressives of its beloved ranked choice voting system in Oakland ignoring the progressive losses in San Francisco under ranked choice voting and executive editor Tim Redmond posted a column denying that there was a political machine in San Francisco, when the Guardian is the lungs and spleen of Peskins machine. One can sympathize with the Guardians discomfort. This election, his preferred system of ranked choice voting came around and bit Peskin in the ass in San Francisco, said John Shanley, Mayor Gavin Newsoms delegate to the Democratic Central Committee.

Shanley called the November election a disaster for the progressives. Ballot issues favored by Peskins DCCC and the Guardian, including invitation-to-voter-fraud initiatives to allow non-citizens to vote and same-day voter registration on the day of next years mayors election, were defeated, along with an attempt to increase the hotel tax to a max that would send budget-minded tourists to Daly City to drink, and the voters passed the Sit-Lie Proposition L, that the DCCC opposed Guardian hyperventilatedly attacked.

...
http://www.argonaut360.com/breaking-news/district-by-di...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC