You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: OK, now I know what you're talking about [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. OK, now I know what you're talking about
Nothing like an expert consensus on that, but at least you're not the only person to suggest it! EDA put out a paper about that.

One problem with that approach is that you can't determine whether any machine actually counted its votes accurately, although you may be able to identify machines that weren't even close. If the 10% sample can be treated as random, that approach can provide pretty good evidence about who won -- although, like all fixed-percentage audits, it sometimes does more work than needed and sometimes not enough -- but it's very hard to detect small errors, much less isolate them to individual machines.

If we get to the point where we can audit individual ballots against how the machines counted them, then a random sample of individual ballots can work very well for checking the winner. But that requires us to have a way to identify individual ballots without compromising secrecy, which is a controversial subject. And it provides even less information about whether any one machine counted accurately, although at least it is capable of detecting "small" errors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC