You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #10: A conspiracy by whom? The Board of Elections and Ethics allowed public testing. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. A conspiracy by whom? The Board of Elections and Ethics allowed public testing.
Edited on Mon Nov-01-10 01:22 AM by Bill Bored
If you're suggesting they engineered the failure of their own tests, I'd say that was probably the patriotic thing to do (to discredit Internet voting!), but I doubt it happened.

That's like suggesting someone deliberately hacked the DREs in FL CD-13 in 2006 to get the state onto paper ballots. While ballot scanner vendors might benefit from such a scam, just as all e-voting vendors benefited from the FL 2000 debacle (a scam according to whistle blowers from Sequoia Voting Systems), who would benefit financially from hacking D.C.'s Internet voting system? It was open source and therefore not-for-profit, but the leader of the team from U. Michigan has a history of hacking for-profit privatized voting machines such as Diebold's DRE too.

If you're suggesting that the D.C. Board deliberately facilitated the hacks to discredit an open source Internet voting system so they could go out and patronize some for-profit Internet voting vendor, such unethical behavior shows exactly why NO ONE should be trusted to run any system as dangerous, vulnerable and unverifiable as Internet voting!

So thanks for trying to prove that point! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -People Who Know Stuff Don't Like Internet Voting (WaPo OpEd) Bill Bored  Oct-30-10 12:50 PM   #0 
  - The ultimate bad idea....internet voting.  yourout   Oct-30-10 12:59 PM   #1 
  - I think you mean UNequivocally, but thanks! nt  Bill Bored   Oct-30-10 01:05 PM   #2 
     - Thanks....  yourout   Oct-30-10 01:07 PM   #3 
  - *cough*  Wilms   Oct-30-10 02:01 PM   #4 
  - Experts? ***pffft!*** Whadda they know?  eppur_se_muova   Oct-30-10 02:09 PM   #5 
  - Happy to be Rec #10!  demodonkey   Oct-30-10 03:48 PM   #6 
  - Time and again they can't even keep fucking CC Numbers secure, now I'm supposed to  AlabamaLibrul   Oct-30-10 07:21 PM   #7 
  - Hey Bill you forgot the comments section  Bill_Kelleher   Oct-31-10 05:41 PM   #8 
  - A conspiracy by whom? The Board of Elections and Ethics allowed public testing.  Bill Bored   Nov-01-10 01:15 AM   #10 
  - Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)  WillYourVoteBCounted   Oct-31-10 06:01 PM   #9 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC