You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #6: I got it back to 4 Recs as soon as I read the part in the OP that said "Shit no!" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I got it back to 4 Recs as soon as I read the part in the OP that said "Shit no!"
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 11:44 PM by Bill Bored
As to why someone would un-rec, there are a lot of folks who still think scanners aren't computers and are lots better than DREs and that when the public counter on the scanner increments, it means the votes will be counted as cast like on a lever machine (no vote switching possible on lever machines!). And they think that because scanners are a step in the right direction for some DRE states, they shouldn't be trashed in public, but more like in private, or among election lawyers who stand to make fortunes representing candidates who want to get recounts, etc.

In other words, there are some vested interests out there who want the scanners.

So maybe your candidates should lawyer up and get those hand recounts -- at least the apparent loser should. The apparent winner should get his lawyer to fight AGAINST the recount, just like Bush v. Gore. The courts and these lawyers will end up deciding the outcome of the election. The voters just show up and vote.

What do you think will happen next? Are Vermonters so damn polite that they won't go to court to find out who really won an election?

(Of course, it may be too late to find out for sure, since the paper ballots are no long in public view.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -Recount in VT is a friggin' JOKE ! garybeck  Sep-07-10 09:04 PM   #0 
  - Actually, they might not get the same count twice. They didn't when  pnwmom   Sep-07-10 09:11 PM   #1 
  - If Dino Rossi is a Republicon, then, by definition,  cognoscere   Sep-08-10 02:33 PM   #17 
  - They will pay  RandomThoughts   Sep-07-10 09:17 PM   #2 
  - who will pay? for what? n/t  garybeck   Sep-07-10 09:29 PM   #3 
     - Long story.  RandomThoughts   Sep-07-10 10:29 PM   #5 
  - Wow. Someone actually "un-rec'd" this !?!?!  garybeck   Sep-07-10 09:51 PM   #4 
  - I got it back to 4 Recs as soon as I read the part in the OP that said "Shit no!"  Bill Bored   Sep-07-10 11:41 PM   #6 
  - I don't get it  garybeck   Sep-08-10 12:22 AM   #7 
     - To clarify, I REC'ed the thread! (And I'd rather have audited op scans than DREs too.) nt  Bill Bored   Sep-08-10 12:37 AM   #8 
        - oh i get it now  garybeck   Sep-08-10 02:29 AM   #11 
           - Right. nt  Bill Bored   Sep-08-10 12:25 PM   #16 
  - Diebold stockholders? nt  Enthusiast   Sep-08-10 04:59 AM   #14 
  - King County (WA State) gave up using scanned images for ballot duplication  eridani   Sep-08-10 01:55 AM   #9 
  - weird. why did they have to duplicate the ballots? n/t  garybeck   Sep-08-10 02:25 AM   #10 
     - Because of the effing all mail in balloting in a voter intent state  eridani   Sep-08-10 03:04 AM   #12 
  - I've said enough about this sort of thing prior to this.  Wilms   Sep-08-10 04:09 AM   #13 
  - Recommend  eomer   Sep-08-10 06:20 AM   #15 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC