You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brennan Center Drops The Ball On WNYC Radio As Host Suggests Keeping Levers Would Prevent Overvoting [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 01:14 AM
Original message
Brennan Center Drops The Ball On WNYC Radio As Host Suggests Keeping Levers Would Prevent Overvoting
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 01:36 AM by Bill Bored


Podcast: http://beta.wnyc.org/shows/bl/2010/jul/14/cancel-voting...

The Brennan Center refuses to give up on electronic vote counting, even if it means thousands of votes will be lost.

The pitch to keep New York's lever voting machines came TWICE from WNYC host Brian Lehrer, who was one of the few mainstream journalists to cover the voting irregularities in Ohio in 2004.

Lehrer asked Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center's so-called Democracy Program: "You say that either the machines should be set to...reject an overvote....or what?....We are already close to Primary Day, which is Sept. 14...Are you actually advocating that we go back to the lever machines?" :think:


Weiser: "Absolutely not." :grr:


And she drops the ball AGAIN when Lehrer asks: "So if the court rules in your favor, it is...possible...that we'll be using the lever machines one or two more times this fall." :applause:


Weiser: "No! We are not seeking to have us return to the lever machines. We're just seeking to have the Board fix the other setup." :mad:


OK, we get the picture. Someone dropped a lever machine on her big toe when she was a child and she'd rather count votes with computers now, even if the NY State Board of Elections can't get the overvote notification right. I can understand that. Shit happens.

But in my opinion, the Brennan Center does NOT have a case, because they're going to federal court over a violation of a state law. HAVA does NOT require voting MACHINES to notify voters of the effect of casting overvotes -- the New York State Election Law does.

If I were a federal judge in this case, I'd tell 'em to get over it, or use the levers, which of course are allowed by HAVA.

It's clear that the NYS election officials are incompetent and therefore not able to run computerized elections. If they can't even get overvote notification right, how the hell can we expect them to stop vote switching, vote padding, vote deletion, and all the other crap that can happen when vote-counting is delegated to computers?
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC