Reply #8: But none of that explains THIS:

[Bill Bored]

It's obvious that you are getting desperate now Wilms, and continue to ignore the REAL analysis!

For example, this EKG from a voter who voted for Bush in 2000, taken shortly after that election...

2000: Voted for Bush:


...compared to this one, from THE SAME VOTER, taken right after she voted for Kerry in 2004:

2004: Voted for Kerry:


Clearly, the diffuse T wave inversions in leads I, II, V2-V6 show that she didn't remember who she had voted for in 2000, and that her vote in 2004 was switched without her knowledge.

EMS technicians working for Rove could have created enough of a disturbance at the polls for the election inspectors to unlock the lever machines and jigger the counters!

If we only had the RAW EXIT POLL DATA, we could correlate it with local 911 calls the day of the election and see which precincts had similar changes in voters' EKGs.

Oh but there's that damn confidentiality clause and the HIPPA regulations too! See: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy /
All designed to subvert the will of the people!