You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: No, keeping the NY facts hidden is distracting... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
WillE Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-07-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. No, keeping the NY facts hidden is distracting...
Edited on Mon Sep-07-09 08:23 AM by WillE
It's been discussed ad nauseum. There's a pattern of you not answering questions and re-asking questions that were answered. I feel distracted when that happens.

- I feel frustrated when you don't do the analysis and ignore the facts.

Where's the large undervote rates showing the kinds of problems you imagined? They don't exist. You've got an imagined danger in search of a made up problem. What a distraction.

- You don't read. I mentioned the 0.79% spoiled vote rate that you and Bored have stated numerous times. But you can't get past that. Because you don't do a full analysis.

Of course computers are used for precinct aggregation--not for tallying votes. And with the precinct data you can verify it. Why don't you? Is it because you're too busy distracting people?

- What a joke! You agree that computers are used for tabulation. They are the equivalent of the central tabulators used all over. No Open Source. No transparency. That's why you need to do some analysis.

You can see if a machine has been manipulated. How many manipulated machines would it take to fulfill your fantasy? Calculate that TIA. And get back to us. We'd appreciate a break from your distractions.

- You guys sure have your talking points. Same old playbook. I've seen that challenge from Bill Bored time and time again. Nothing original there. You need to do some analysis/
SINCE IT IS APPARENT THAT YOU ARE IN DENIAL, I REPEAT:
IT'S NOT THE MACHINES. IT'S THE HUMANS WHO FEE THE NUMBERS INTO THE COMPUTERS!

You can test the machines before and after. And they do. And probably not enough. Do you participate in that? What are you going to do? Or do you just distract people?

- No. I do not participate. Why should I? I don't live in NY. I appreciate a full analysis. Do you?

Do they audit HCPB's? Shouldn't they? HUMANS, ya know. What are you doing about New Hampshire hemorrhaging HCPB precincts? Does it take ALL your time to distract people?

- THERE WAS NO CHAIN OF CUSTODY IN THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY. RIGGED COMPUTERS. GOOD BALLOTS.
AN ANALYSIS OF VOTE SHARE ANOMALIES BETWEEN HAND-COUNTED AND MACHINE PRECINCTS SHOWED THAT THE ELECTION WAS MOST-LIKELY STOLEN FROM OBAMA.

What have you done to get HCPB implemented in NY? What have you done to save the dwindling number of HCPB precincts in NH?

- I do not live in NY or in NH. It's YOUR job to get HCPB implemented. And to ANALYZE.

Why do think a strategy of distracting people, leading people astray, and generally acting like the court jester is in the best interest of election reform?

-Asking legitimate questions is distracting?

IS AN ANALYSIS OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS WHICH SHOW THAT
1- there was a strong correlation between NY vote change from 2000 and county size distracting?
2- there were 300,000 NET uncounted votes distracting?
3- Gore had 60.2% of the NY RECORDED vote and third parties 4.6% distracting?
4- 75% of Nader voters defected to Kerry distracting?
5- the NY GEO exit poll WPE was 12% distracting?
6- the 5% exit poll vote share deviation (3-4% beyond the 1-2% MoE) distracting?
7- the Urban Legend is a myth distracting?
8- there was a virtual 100% probability that votes were miscounted distracting?
9 - Richard Hayes Philips was apparently unaware of the 65% Kerry exit poll is distracting?
10- provided by returning exit polls distracting?
11- provided by 500,000 late votes in 2004 distracting?
11- Obama's votes were initially reported to be ZERO in 80 MINORITY districts distracting?
12- there were 300,000 NET uncounted votes distracting?
13- the True Vote CONFIRMED the exit polls AND Late PAPER BALLOT vote shares distracting?

Making people aware of these FACTS is distracting?

By avoiding these issues you are either biased or in denial.
In either case, calling them a distraction is a disservice to your cause.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC