Reply #42: Educate us, then, since you are such an expert...

[WillE]

Are computers used at any time in the process of tabulating the lever votes?
Yes or No?

Can you provide any proof that the NY votes were counted as cast?
Yes or No?

Do levers stop counting at 99 or 999?
Yes or No?

Did LEVERS cause Obama's ZERO votes in 80 districts or was it HUMAN COUNTERS?
Pick one.

Why is it that there were 19 reported LEVER MACHINES that would not register Kerry votes ("Stuck on Bush") but there were ZERO reported "Stuck on Kerry" incidents?

Can you estimate how many people left the precincts without voting due to machine breakdowns?
Was it 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, or 100,000?

See, it's not just the S = 0.79% reported spoiled votes.
It's the H votes that were miscounted by Humans,
the C votes miscounted by the Computing tabulators,
and the M votes never CAST due to malfunctioning machines.

The total fraudulent votes F = 0.79%* 7 million + H + C + M
or F = 55,000 + H + C + M

What is H?
What is C?
What is M?

You don't know.
You cannot know.
There is no way to know without a fully TRANSPARENT VOTING SYSTEM.

Now go ahead.
Call that "shit" science.
It's just simple arithmetic.

Once again, in nutshell

2000
Gore 60; Bush 35; Nader/other 5

2004
3 of 4 Nader/other voters to Kerry
Kerry 63; Bush 36; Other 1
Simple arithmetic.

Confirmed by the exit polls

Confirmed by the True Vote Model
(2000 votes cast less 5% mortality; 97-98% turnout;
Approximately 1 million New (65-70% Kerry) voters.

Confirmed by the 500,000 late paper ballot votes (66% to Kerry)

That is not FAITH-BASED BELIEF.
That's basic analysis.

Can you see it?
Do you want to see it?

Or will you just call it "shit" science?

Your move.