Stevepol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-04-09 03:52 AM
Response to Original message |
| -Late Vote Smoking Guns: 2000-2008 |
WillE |
Sep-03-09 01:50 PM |
#0 |
 -
the crucial error appears to be here: |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-03-09 04:14 PM |
#1 |
  -
Yes, the NY late vote indicated a Gore bias. But there was NO Kerry bias in 2004. And 2008 ? |
WillE |
Sep-03-09 06:17 PM |
#2 |
| -
it seems to me that you are simply ruling out an obvious possibility |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-03-09 08:46 PM |
#3 |
| -
It seems to me that you easily dismiss the very strong State Late vote vs. Exit Poll correlation |
WillE |
Sep-04-09 08:35 AM |
#6 |
| -
it seems to me that you didn't read my post |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-04-09 09:04 AM |
#7 |
| -
You see, the point is: the exit polls were RIGHT in 2004. Kerry really DID win. |
WillE |
Sep-04-09 12:23 PM |
#8 |
| -
that's a claim, and your own evidence undermines it |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-04-09 04:44 PM |
#9 |
| -
You still believe that Bush won, "the greatest miracle of all" |
WillE |
Sep-04-09 07:16 PM |
#10 |
| -
this is yet another non-responsive post |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-04-09 07:43 PM |
#11 |
| -
I asked you for YOUR evidence. You resort to whining. |
WillE |
Sep-04-09 07:54 PM |
#12 |
| -
umm, is post #9 actually invisible, or what? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-04-09 08:48 PM |
#13 |
| -
Your obfuscation won't work. Late votes, exit polls and True votes INDEPENDENTLY expose you. |
WillE |
Sep-05-09 09:26 AM |
#14 |
| -
"what are you going to do, bleed on me?" |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-05-09 11:52 AM |
#15 |
| -
You are in a state of pure panic; you are the one bleeding |
WillE |
Sep-05-09 08:03 PM |
#16 |
| -
hahaha |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-05-09 09:27 PM |
#17 |
| -
You are dreaming.. |
WillE |
Sep-05-09 10:02 PM |
#18 |
| -
do you have any substantive response to post #9? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 06:19 AM |
#19 |
| -
Give us some names... |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 07:39 AM |
#20 |
| -
do you have a substantive response to post #9? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 08:37 AM |
#22 |
| -
Umm, did you read the reply in post # 14, or what? |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 08:19 AM |
#21 |
| -
any reader can verify that you simply ignored my points |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 08:49 AM |
#23 |
| -
Our evidence vs. your evidence |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 09:16 AM |
#24 |
| -
do you have a substantive response to post #9? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 09:57 AM |
#25 |
| -
Back in the USSR Quoting two Ruskies? Show us their evidence |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 12:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
WTF?! "two Ruskies"?! (oh... got anything on post #9?) |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 06:41 PM |
#27 |
| -
Now I see where TIA, er, Wile E., gets that punch card lever machine. |
Wilms |
Sep-06-09 06:55 PM |
#28 |
| -
Phillips would NOT have written the article if he knew that the NY exits were off by 12%... |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 07:28 PM |
#30 |
| -
Wow. Just wow. |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 07:37 PM |
#31 |
| -
OK. You failed logic. So I won't expect you to make sense of what I'm about to say. |
Wilms |
Sep-06-09 09:29 PM |
#38 |
| -
YOU speak of science? Your method is faith-based belief... |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 10:14 PM |
#40 |
| -
When you demonstrate a rudimentery understanding of lever machines |
Wilms |
Sep-06-09 10:28 PM |
#41 |
| -
Educate us, then, since you are such an expert... |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 11:14 PM |
#42 |
| -
Round and round you go, TIA. |
Wilms |
Sep-07-09 12:26 AM |
#43 |
| -
No, keeping the NY facts hidden is distracting... |
WillE |
Sep-07-09 07:13 AM |
#44 |
| -
What's it like being irrelevant? |
Wilms |
Sep-07-09 11:15 AM |
#48 |
| -
Love your ability to link and not think .. n/t |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 08:22 PM |
#35 |
| -
So where is their evidence? |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 07:17 PM |
#29 |
| -
you're asking for kindness? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 07:45 PM |
#32 |
| -
You replied just as WE ALL KNEW you would. With NOTHING. |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 08:06 PM |
#34 |
| -
"WE"? you and your imaginary friend? can he help out with post #9? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 09:10 PM |
#36 |
| -
So did Myagkov et al actually analyze the U.S. (S)elections? NO! |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 07:56 PM |
#33 |
| -
OK, this time you actually needed to read your own post |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-06-09 09:13 PM |
#37 |
| -
Hehe. Not good enough. DISPLAY AND EXPLAIN THE RELEVANT ANALYSIS. |
WillE |
Sep-06-09 09:47 PM |
#39 |
| -
this time you're not even going to admit your blunder? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-07-09 07:22 AM |
#45 |
| -
You just cut yourself off. You read the book? Then show us what you learned. |
WillE |
Sep-07-09 07:36 AM |
#46 |
| -
do you have a substantive response to post #9? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-07-09 07:44 AM |
#47 |
| -
Uhm, er, pardon. But TIA just used a bunch of all caps. |
Wilms |
Sep-07-09 11:17 AM |
#49 |
| -
hey, if he does it seven times, my exoskeleton will collapse |
OnTheOtherHand |
Sep-07-09 12:10 PM |
#50 |
| -
Do you have anything SUBSTANTIVE to say? |
WillE |
Sep-07-09 12:16 PM |
#51 |
| -
TIA, you are the "one-track agenda". And it's all about you. |
Wilms |
Sep-07-09 02:15 PM |
#52 |
| -
K&R!! |
Stevepol |
Sep-04-09 03:52 AM |
#4 |
| -
K&unR. |
yowzayowzayowza |
Sep-04-09 04:50 AM |
#5 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread