You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #115: It's time for you to recognize some facts..... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
WillE Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-30-09 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #101
115. It's time for you to recognize some facts.....
Edited on Sun Aug-30-09 02:02 AM by WillE
My name is Bill (you can call me Will). I admit to being very familiar with TIA's work and have read all of his analysis. Have you?

I said that the activists are winning by 1) proving endemic election fraud and 2)forcing election officials to replace their unverifiable voting systems. I agree that the audits are inadequate. So are the recounts.

Who is this accountant you speak of? I am not an accountant.

By the way, Ohio 2004 was examined by Richard Hayes Phillips. He wrote a book on it. And ballots destroyed were destroyed in 55 of 88 Ohio counties.

It's a good thing we also have the Ohio exit polls. Ron Baiman and Kathy Dopp of USCV also proved that OHIO was stolen by analyzing raw precinct exit poll data. Are you aware of that? Are you familiar with what USCV has done?

You made this outrageous statement:
"His exit poll analysis impresses a peanut gallery of people that have an eighth grade math level they find sufficient cause to believe what they're told".

Know this: it was the exit polls that brought attention to the 2004 fraud on DU!
You should thank the exit poll math analysts like TIA, Freeman, Baiman, Dopp, etc.

Without 2004 state and national exit polls this forum would probably never have been created because no one would have questioned the theft back then. The exit poll analysts jump-started the debates right here on DU.

People came to DU looking for answers. The only evidence they had were the exit polls. But trolls tried to debunk the exit poll analysts immediately after the election. Now, there is only one individual left on this forum who still thrashes exit poll and believes that Bush won legitimately.

Here's a question for you: What would have been your rationale to suggest that the 2004 election was fraudulent had there been no exit polls to analyze? What other evidence would you have pointed to? If it was just a "gut" feeling or mere "belief", you would have gotten nowhere. Without numerical evidence you have squat.

Based on your lack of substantive response, you appear to be math challenged. You demean the efforts of all the exit poll math analysts who have proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the election was stolen. In 2004 that was not obvious. But now virtually all DUers believe it, including you.

And if you think about it, the primary reasons reason for your belief are the pre-election and exit polls. You just won't admit it.You and Bill Bored should stop knocking the exits! It's because of them that you are posting on DU Elections.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC