You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: uh, no [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. uh, no
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 08:48 PM by OnTheOtherHand
I didn't question that Oregon was 100% paper ballots, nor was that what you claimed. How simple do things have to be for you, anyway?

E-M conducted the exit poll via phone since there are no precincts.

Or, in ordinary English, there was no exit poll in Oregon. Doh.

In your world, apparently this fact is obviously irrelevant. 'Wow, isn't it amazing how accurate the exit poll was in a state where there wasn't an exit poll?' Yeah, amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC