You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Holt's 3/5/10% audit will not give a high statistical confidence in close elections. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Holt's 3/5/10% audit will not give a high statistical confidence in close elections.
(ie: the ones we're most concerned with.)

In most other elections, it's overkill that wastes money.

While Holt's proposed bill doesn't prevent states from conducting better audits, it doesn't compel them.

A false sense of security could result. Conversely, a disrespect for the process could creep in.
As it is, many believe their vote is counted as a result of them having marked it on a paper ballot. :rofl: Others are giddy when Diebold gets the boot, only to be replaced by another vendor's insecure equipment. :eyes: But it's impolite to point out that paper ballots aren't any safer than a DRE given the way they are generally processed. You'd think the fact that the same GEMS system configures both Diebold's DREs and OpScans would be a massive clue. But no.

Many know Andy Stephenson called for paper ballots. Few recall that he advocated meaningful audits. The former, without the latter, is a is an unworthy goal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC