You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: GIven the EAC Advisory, NYVV is reasonable [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
payin attention Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. GIven the EAC Advisory, NYVV is reasonable
to say that 301(a)(2) is clear and unambiguous about the paper-record requirement.

Btw, here's a link to the 2005-05 Advisory you mention; the EAC seemed to think that the 301(a)(2) requirement for a paper record was clear and unambigous.

http://www.eac.gov/election/docs/eac-20advisorylevermac...

About the DREs, I don't think the EAC needed to clarify, because DREs can produce a permanent paper recordn for manual audit purposes - it just doesn't have to be voter-verified. Appalling, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC