You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: I ask again: what is wrong with a good (computerized) optical scanning of paper ballots? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. I ask again: what is wrong with a good (computerized) optical scanning of paper ballots?
It's a hell of a lot better than lousy lever machines, on which your New York votes are probably being stolen as we speak.

And there isn't a state in the nation that hand counts ballots. Except in the case of recounts for extremely close contests. Then the paper ballots from COMPUTERIZED optical scan systems are the best option.

Am I missing something, or are New Yorkers just luddites?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -New Yorkers should be alert - new threat to Lever Machines WillYourVoteBCounted  Jan-05-09 12:00 AM   #0 
  - More: IRV is a well intended reform, but doesn't meet its promise.  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 12:15 AM   #1 
  - Other nations are using IRV . . . let's look at their actual experiences . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 12:19 AM   #3 
     - I live in the foreign country of North Carolina, and IRV is threatening our verified voting law  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 12:22 AM   #4 
     - This is an old problem, having nothing to do with IRV --  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 12:29 AM   #7 
        - How a 2007 IRV experiment violated several of NC election laws  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 01:09 AM   #13 
           - But WHO violated your laws ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 03:00 PM   #24 
     - Scotland traded hand counted paper ballots for STV (a form of IRV)  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 12:24 AM   #5 
        - IRV has nothing to do with computer counting ....  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 12:31 AM   #8 
           - did you read the OP? IRV incentivizes computerized voting machines  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 01:02 AM   #12 
           - That's an OPINION ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 03:04 PM   #25 
              - Thats an opinion of an internationally reknowned Computer Scientist  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:36 PM   #44 
                 - It's still OPINION . . . and you're on ignore . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:49 PM   #55 
                    - in your case, the phrase "epic fail" comes to mind  OnTheOtherHand   Jan-06-09 07:44 PM   #63 
           - IRV just happens to incentivize computerized counting  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 01:10 AM   #14 
              - Voters were confused by "butterfly ballot" ...that's why they were banned ....  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 03:10 PM   #26 
                 - Electionline: "Ranked-Choice Voting and Flawed Ballots Tax San Francisco's Election"  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:14 PM   #40 
                 - San Francisco Grand Jury Report: Instant runoff not understood by voters and poll workers  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:17 PM   #41 
                    - Are you repeating this . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:47 PM   #54 
  - IRV can be paper and pen . . . doesn't have to be computer . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 12:17 AM   #2 
  - Yes it could be but it requires software to count it - hence bye bye lever machines  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 12:26 AM   #6 
  - The problem is the dishonesty of HAVA not IRV . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 12:31 AM   #9 
     - HAVA doesn't require voting machines  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 12:59 AM   #11 
        - Did I read ALL of HAVA ... No ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 02:43 PM   #22 
           - where did you read that HAVA required "voting machines"?  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 05:26 PM   #30 
              - That's right.  Wilms   Jan-05-09 09:27 PM   #47 
                 - To be fair . . . it's a program which offers duplicity/trickery . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-06-09 12:03 AM   #56 
                    - Fine. I'll agree. "most interpertations are that it pushes states/counties to electronic voting..."  Wilms   Jan-06-09 12:49 AM   #60 
                       - HAVA didn't require ditching punch cards either  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-06-09 06:14 PM   #61 
                          - From what I recall in recent reading ...  defendandprotect   Jan-06-09 06:59 PM   #62 
                             - Read again. HAVA did not ban punch cards  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-07-09 11:11 AM   #64 
                             - please provide a citation for what you read  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-07-09 11:13 AM   #65 
  - please tell us how IRV is counted in the United States and Scotland  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 01:20 AM   #16 
     - Please explain ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 03:14 PM   #27 
        - do you know anything about IRV, like how it is counted?  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 05:27 PM   #31 
           - How about ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 06:27 PM   #33 
              - IRV makes it easier to rig the election or just flat out miscount it  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 06:48 PM   #36 
                 - Baloney . .. that's Dem/Repug propaganda cause they don't want change ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:42 PM   #52 
  - What makes you want to cling to lever machines?  frazzled   Jan-05-09 12:33 AM   #10 
  - Learn why NY wants to cling to lever machines:  Bill Bored   Jan-05-09 03:28 AM   #18 
  - Agreed.... lever machines may be harder to fix ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 03:21 PM   #28 
     - Don't take HAVA money, except to provide accessibility.  Bill Bored   Jan-05-09 07:23 PM   #43 
        - Re your last paragraph . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:46 PM   #53 
  - like clinging to their guns and religion?  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 11:45 AM   #19 
  - I ask again: what is wrong with a good (computerized) optical scanning of paper ballots?  frazzled   Jan-05-09 01:11 AM   #15 
  - NY is way ahead of the game!  Bill Bored   Jan-05-09 03:15 AM   #17 
     - I am sorry ...  frazzled   Jan-05-09 12:10 PM   #20 
        - please answer these questions so you can prove optical scan is better than levers:  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 12:33 PM   #21 
        - You can have PAPER with any system ....  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 03:22 PM   #29 
        - A possibility to recount by hand? When and where?  Bill Bored   Jan-05-09 07:06 PM   #38 
        - "the possibility to recount by hand"  Wilms   Jan-05-09 09:33 PM   #48 
  - I think we had best be "warned" that resistance to IRV comes mainly ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 02:53 PM   #23 
  - Dr. Rebecca Mercuri: IRV leads to "potential gaming" of the ballot  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 05:30 PM   #32 
  - I think we all have open minds about elections ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 06:36 PM   #34 
     - Libertarian Reform Caucus: "Anyone for a Bullet in the Foot? Instant Runoff!"  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:04 PM   #37 
     - Why does IRV lead to 2-party domination?  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:40 PM   #45 
        - Without doubt, the 2-party monopoly wants to keep lock on elections . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:40 PM   #51 
           - without a doubt, IRV entrenches the 2-party monopoly  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-06-09 12:24 AM   #59 
  - Australian Politics: "promotes a two-party system...."  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:19 PM   #42 
  - For those not familiar with the decades of computer steals ...  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 06:39 PM   #35 
     - "IRV.. not summable.... makes it more susceptible to tampering"  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:07 PM   #39 
     - That's Dem/Repug propaganda -- they sure don't want CHOICE ....!!!  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:36 PM   #49 
        - and you support IRV which incentivizes computerized voting  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-06-09 12:23 AM   #58 
     - "The complexity of IRV ...provides increased opportunities for wholesale fraud or malfunction"  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-05-09 07:42 PM   #46 
        - The opponents of IRV are Dems and Repugs who don't want voters . . .  defendandprotect   Jan-05-09 11:38 PM   #50 
           - Attack the messenger because you have no facts  WillYourVoteBCounted   Jan-06-09 12:23 AM   #57 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC