You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: point by point [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. point by point
Point 1: see e.g. Walter Mebane's correspondence with Kathy Dopp. The registration figures aren't a very good benchmark because crossover voting consistently varies from county to county. Using other elections as benchmarks, there is no sign of an op-scan effect. See also the critiques of the Berkeley study.

Point 2: I can't tell what the point is here; surely not just that op-scans are hackable. As for the NH primary, results in hand count jurisdictions diverged not only in 2008 but also in 2004 and 2000, consistent with the hypothesis that these jurisdictions are actually politically different. See Herron et al.. I suppose it's arguable that the same hacking occurred in 2000 and 2004, although I don't find it very plausible in light of the results.

Point 3: Completely off topic, as it doesn't describe election events. Again, I haven't contested that the scanners are hackable.

Point 4: Assumes what was to be supported ("the last two stolen Presidential elections"), but of course you're right that in many states it's difficult or impossible actually to use the paper ballots or records after the election.

Point 5: I'm happy to discuss this if you can explain what you actually did. "look as if they had been transposed, or flipped" and "Expected Dem" don't let me replicate your methodology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC