You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #81: you say it's the point, but you aren't supporting it: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #65
81. you say it's the point, but you aren't supporting it:
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 06:38 AM by OnTheOtherHand
ETA: I forgot: thanks for the lead on, maybe, WESH. So your impression is that the VNS person gave an interview to the local affiliate? If so, that seems a bit weird to me, but I dunno.

And that is the point, isn't it? The exit polls showed that the spoiled ballots would have gone heavily for Gore.

How?

Please offer your mathematical explanation of how the Florida exit poll reveals how the spoiled ballots were voted. I bet yowzayowzayowza is curious as well, and probably for the same reason.

(No, I don't think that people deliberately voided their own ballots.)

What you are looking at is "how" the respondents "believe" they voted. In FL 2000 this was an accurate snapshot.

Unfortunately, what I am looking at is a lot of hand-waving assertions. You seem to think you know what the exit poll data revealed, but when pressed for specifics, you seem either to retreat or to change the subject.

My entire argument is that VNS had an ACCURATE snapshot of the election in FL 2000, on election night, in real time, and it showed that Gore was missing some 50,000 votes.

Well, there has been no argument yet. I keep asking for one. Trying to ask pointed questions hasn't helped, so perhaps you should just try to lay it out on your own terms.

So, do you understand the problem now with your whole attitude about this?

You mean, my "attitude" when I ask you to support your claims? Seems pretty scientific to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC