You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: I have worked on two fronts [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I have worked on two fronts
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 10:17 AM by OnTheOtherHand
First, I've done considerable work in election forensics. There is a tacit conspiracy among certain self-styled election integrity supporters -- presumably unintentional -- to undermine the movement by serving up facially risible claims and partisan (or anti-"establishment") rants. Like many other people, I've spent a lot of time and energy trying to demonstrate that one can take election integrity seriously without drinking the Kool-Aid. This work is tedious but essential, because election integrity is a majoritarian value and deserves majoritarian arguments -- arguments that at least merit the endorsement of most Americans. To speak credibly about threats to election integrity, one has to be credible. Lots of self-appointed leaders can't clear that hurdle. (Take Mark Crispin Miller, whose premise in Fooled Again is that Bush's reelection was "a miracle." There's no way he can sell that pile to most people, or most political scientists; he might as well paint a scarlet Q for Quack on his forehead.)

Second, I've worked on post-election audit design. (Really this is almost indistinguishable from the first point: audits are proactive forensics, more or less.) I coauthored an article in The American Statistician about statistically rigorous audits, helped to draft New Jersey's statistical audit legislation and testified on its behalf, participate in audit working groups in Ohio and Florida, and have helped informally with audit proposals in Colorado, Massachusetts, and California.

It isn't very much, but I think we could have gotten further if some people thought harder before they spoke.

I have to admit, "Bonn1997," I'm not very curious about what you've done. But if you want to share, maybe it's more interesting than I think. (ETA) Let me be clear about this: you may be doing excellent work when you aren't busy waving your hands about exit polls over here; if so, I applaud it. I'm just not very curious one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC