You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #15: I do not believe that John Q is ready for impeachment. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-19-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I do not believe that John Q is ready for impeachment.
The iron is not yet hot enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -There is something I'm not understanding about Mr. Conyers. sfexpat2000  Feb-18-07 09:29 PM   #0 
  - I don't want to bite his head off, I just don't understand his thinking.  sfexpat2000   Feb-18-07 09:36 PM   #1 
  - Well, although I think that he believes that Impeachment is warranted...  oldtimecanuk   Feb-18-07 09:37 PM   #2 
  - Mr. Conyers' point was that the people weigh in during elections.  sfexpat2000   Feb-18-07 09:39 PM   #3 
     - Hmmmmmmm I wonder if he is reflecting on the stolen elections that...  oldtimecanuk   Feb-18-07 09:52 PM   #6 
     - My question is very little. How do we weigh in if our elections are corrupt?  sfexpat2000   Feb-18-07 09:56 PM   #7 
        - (I think he -- and Pelosi - are thinking "Fitzgerald" could be the expeditious route for time being)  tiptoe   Feb-19-07 06:09 AM   #19 
           - Pelosi and Conyers are two of the smartest people in government.  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 08:53 AM   #23 
     - Yep, you got me on that one.. I really don't have an answer...  oldtimecanuk   Feb-18-07 10:10 PM   #10 
  - I saw that too...  stillcool47   Feb-18-07 09:40 PM   #4 
  - Thanks, stillcool47. Maybe someone can knit this up. I can't  sfexpat2000   Feb-18-07 09:47 PM   #5 
  - What one must always keep in mind is that they are all bought and sold.  TomInTib   Feb-18-07 09:58 PM   #8 
  - But there has to be a wedge, a way in, or the Dems wouldn't have  sfexpat2000   Feb-18-07 10:06 PM   #9 
     - I do not believe that John Q is ready for impeachment.  TomInTib   Feb-19-07 12:22 AM   #15 
  - He is educating the American voter with his hearings and weakening  jwirr   Feb-18-07 10:41 PM   #11 
  - I'm sorry. That makes no sense to me.  sfexpat2000   Feb-18-07 10:45 PM   #12 
  - i disagree with this "  flyarm   Feb-19-07 08:34 AM   #20 
     - At least you whistle beautifully, fly. We know that.  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 08:45 AM   #22 
     - The 2006 elections are proof that the voters are being educated.  jwirr   Feb-19-07 01:53 PM   #29 
        - Not necessarily. They may only be proof that it's harder to rig  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 03:05 PM   #30 
  - Pelosi's chat with him sure did wonders (no more talk of the big I)!!  rodeodance   Feb-18-07 11:03 PM   #13 
  - Conyers was a bulldog on impeachment last year  wtmusic   Feb-18-07 11:34 PM   #14 
  - I didn't understand the senate refusing to pass resolution r/e IRAQ  WillYourVoteBCounted   Feb-19-07 12:36 AM   #16 
  - It is irreconcilable. A product of the impeachophobia. . .  pat_k   Feb-19-07 12:51 AM   #17 
  - And THAT'S why these Iran Contra bastards are STILL here  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 08:42 AM   #21 
     - Robert Parry's "Hey, Democrats, Truth Matters!" says it all.  pat_k   Feb-19-07 10:05 AM   #26 
        - I have to read this. And today, I'm going to give this question  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 10:17 AM   #27 
  - Maybe...  nicknameless   Feb-19-07 05:10 AM   #18 
  - But it is odd that he would say we can take care of it via our election  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 09:05 AM   #25 
     - well, a lot of us don't agree with the prophecy of doom  OnTheOtherHand   Feb-19-07 10:24 AM   #28 
     - I agree that his statement is inconsistent with the way things stand now.  nicknameless   Feb-19-07 11:37 PM   #33 
  - Here's the contact page for Judiciary should anyone want to use it  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 09:02 AM   #24 
  - Dem bashing will not produce the outcome discussed. Patience might. n/t  L. Coyote   Feb-19-07 03:17 PM   #31 
  - It's not bashing to ask a respected member to explain an incongruity.  sfexpat2000   Feb-19-07 05:11 PM   #32 
  - Here's what I think.  livvy   Feb-20-07 07:59 AM   #34 
  - You're so right about page 20C. And that's why/ how Paul Thompson  sfexpat2000   Feb-20-07 09:53 AM   #35 
  - Actually there IS something being done about impeachment...  AtLiberty   Feb-20-07 12:32 PM   #36 
     - Interesting. Well, I'm sure it's not really "off the table" at all.  sfexpat2000   Feb-20-07 02:59 PM   #37 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC