You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #85: your actual argument is even worse [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. your actual argument is even worse
TIA, if you had argued that no Gore voter would vote for Bush, that would be clean and falsifiable. Instead, you're arguing that 8% is acceptable, but 14% is too many. And you've presented no reason whatsoever why 8% is acceptable, but 14% is too many. It's a quantitative claim that you're backing with qualitative evidence (Bush's first term sucked) or irrelevant quantitative evidence (48.5% approval -- well, what is the quantitative relationship between approval ratings and defection rates?). What, does it have to be 10% or less because otherwise you would run out of fingers? What is the argument?

As for the stuff where you take credit for singlehandedly galvanizing the election integrity movement, well, people will have to score that for themselves. But accusing Febble of "HEAR-NO-EVIL, SEE-NO-EVIL PRONOUNCEMENTS" about the 2004 election -- well, that's disgraceful. Delusional, dishonest, I'm not sure which, but disgraceful either way. Here's some classic Febble, via Daily Kos:
I am a fraudster. I believe your election was inexcusably riggable and may well have been rigged. It was also inexcusably unauditable. I am convinced that there was real and massive voter suppression in Ohio, and that it was probably deliberate. I think the recount in Ohio was a sham, and the subversion of the recount is in itself suggestive of coverup of fraud. I think Kenneth Blackwell should be jailed.

It's not as if I've cherry-picked this: you could find dozens of Febble's statements along these lines on DU. "Hear-no-evil, see-no-evil"? Looks to me like character assassination to cover the holes in your arguments (perhaps so you won't notice them yourself). Really depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC