You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: actually not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. actually not
There are many (in fact infinite) permutations of values that would approximately match the official results, which is what I was actually challenged to do in that thread. (Maybe TIA has forgotten that, and that is why he keeps falsely claiming that I assume the official results are correct?)

But also, as I have pointed out repeatedly: (1) There is substantial evidence that poll respondents, including exit poll respondents, tend to overstate having voting for the previous winner; (2) in the 2000-2004 National Election Study, applying the 2004 weights, over 14% of people who reported voting in both elections, and voting for Gore in 2000, reported having voted for Bush in 2004.

"If the exit-polls weren't good science are you saying the polls were bad science?"

No. Perhaps if you read the post a few more times?

"as you are claiming, there were 13% of Gore voters who went bush and no bush voters who went Gore. That is simply implausible."

Well, that is simply inaccurate. Actually, what I suggest is that about twice as many Gore voters went Bush as Bush voters went Kerry. (Somewhere around 14%, versus somewhere around 7%.) Now, if you think that is "simply implausible," perhaps you could explain why. I find it plausible, among other reasons, because it actually happened in the NES panel. Whatever is, is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC